In preparation of making `-Wreturn-type` default to an error (as there
is virtually no situation where you’d *want* to fall off the end of a
function that is supposed to return a value), this patch fixes tests
that have relied on this being only a warning, of which there seem
to be 3 kinds:
1. Tests which for no apparent reason have a function that triggers the
warning.
I suspect that a lot of these were on accident (or from before the
warning was introduced), since a lot of people will open issues w/ their
problematic code in the `main` function (which is the one case where you
don’t need to return from a non-void function, after all...), which
someone will then copy, possibly into a namespace, possibly renaming it,
the end result of that being that you end up w/ something that
definitely is not `main` anymore, but which still is declared as
returning `int`, and which still has no return statement (another reason
why I think this might apply to a lot of these is because usually the
actual return type of such problematic functions is quite literally
`int`).
A lot of these are really old tests that don’t use `-verify`, which is
why no-one noticed or had to care about the extra warning that was
already being emitted by them until now.
2. Tests which test either `-Wreturn-type`, `[[noreturn]]`, or what
codegen and sanitisers do whenever you do fall off the end of a
function.
3. Tests where I struggle to figure out what is even being tested
(usually because they’re Objective-C tests, and I don’t know
Objective-C), whether falling off the end of a function matters in the
first place, and tests where actually spelling out an expression to
return would be rather cumbersome (e.g. matrix types currently don’t
support list initialisation, so I can’t write e.g. `return {}`).
For tests that fall into categories 2 and 3, I just added
`-Wno-error=return-type` to the `RUN` lines and called it a day. This
was especially necessary for the former since `-Wreturn-type` is an
analysis-based warning, meaning that it is currently impossible to test
for more than one occurrence of it in the same compilation if it
defaults to an error since the analysis pass is skipped for subsequent
functions as soon as an error is emitted.
I’ve also added `-Werror=return-type` to a few tests that I had already
updated as this patch was previously already making the warning an error
by default, but we’ve decided to split that into two patches instead.
When instantiating "callable<T>", the "class CallableType" nested type
will only have a declaration in the copy for the instantiation - because
it's not refereed to directly by any other code that would need a
complete definition.
However, in the past, when conservative eval calling member function, we
took the static type of the "this" expr, and looked up the CXXRecordDecl
it refereed to to see if it has any mutable members (to decide if it
needs to refine invalidation or not). Unfortunately, that query needs a
definition, and it asserts otherwise, thus we crashed.
To fix this, we should consult the dynamic type of the object, because
that will have the definition.
I anyways added a check for "hasDefinition" just to be on the safe side.
Fixes#77378
Conservative evaluation of a C++ method call would invalidate the object,
as long as the method is not const or the object has mutable fields.
When checking for mutable fields, we need to scan the type of the object on
which the method is called, which may be more specific than the type of the
object on which the method is defined, hence we look up the type from the
this-argument expression.
If arrow syntax or implicit-this syntax is used, this-argument expression
has pointer type, not record type, and lookup accidentally failed for that
reason. Obtain object type correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48460
llvm-svn: 335555
Prevent invalidation of `this' when a method is const; fixing PR 21606.
A patch by Sean Eveson!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13099
llvm-svn: 250237
