The SFINAE isn't required, since the primary `tuple` class already does
the SFINAE checks. This removes a bit of code that was only used for
these constraints.
This also moves the `tuple_element` specialization for `tuple` to
`__fwd/tuple.h` to avoid a dependency on `__tuple/sfinae_helpers.h`
(which should be moved in a follow-up).
And constrain the new `operator==` since C++26.
This patch implements parts of P2165R4, P2944R3, and a possibly improved
resolution of LWG3882. Currently, libstdc++ and MSVC STL constrain the
new overloads in the same way.
Also set feature-test macro `__cpp_lib_constrained_equality` and add
related release note, as P2944R3 will completed with this patch.
Fixes#136765Fixes#136770Fixes#105424
The internal API is a lot more complicated than it actually needs to be.
This refactors the internal API to match the features and names of the
public one.
Currently, libc++'s `<tuple>` is using the deprecated
`__reference_binds_to_temporary` intrinsic. This PR starts to use
`__reference_constructs_from_temporary` if possible.
It seems that `__reference_constructs_from_temporary` should be used via
an internal type traits provided in
`<__type_traits/reference_constructs_from_temporary.h>`. But given the
old intrinsic was directly used, this PR doesn't switch to the current
convention yet.
P2255R2 is related. Although the paper indicated that constructors of
`tuple` should be deleted in such a case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>
Requirements on character-like types are updated unconditionally,
because `basic_string` does requires the default-constructibility. It
might be possible to make `basic_string_view` support classes with
non-public trivial default constructor, but this doesn't seem sensible.
libcxxabi's `ItaniumDemangle.h` is also updated to avoid deprecated
features.
1013fe3c0cfd7582e94ef2d4bfd79da7ea1a1289 used to implement LWG2770, but
cb0d4df97490ec2d2b1cdf7574d26b1bc4063599 made LWG2770 unimplemented
again because of CWG2386.
This patch re-implements LWG2770, while keeping the libc++-specific
implementation strategy (which is controversial as noted in LWG4040).
Drive-by:
- Make the test coverage for the controversial part noted in LWG4040
libc++-only.
- Add the previously missed entry for LWG2770 to the documentation.
Currently, when the result type is 1-`tuple`, `tuple_cat` possibly tests
an undesired constructor of the element, due to conversion from the
reference tuple to the result type. If the element type has an
unconstrained constructor template, there can be extraneous hard error
which shouldn't happen.
This patch introduces a helper function template to select the element-wise
constructor template of `tuple`, which can avoid such error.
Fixes#41034.
This patch adds a large number of missing includes in the libc++ headers
and the test suite. Those were found as part of the effort to move
towards a mostly monolithic top-level std module.
* Guard `std::__make_from_tuple_impl` tests with `#ifdef _LIBCPP_VERSION` and `LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT`.
* Change `_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20` to `TEST_CONSTEXPR_CXX20`.
+ Other functions in `variant.swap/swap.pass.cpp` were already using the proper test macro.
* Mark `what` as `[[maybe_unused]]` when used by `TEST_LIBCPP_REQUIRE`.
+ This updates one occurrence in `libcxx/test/libcxx` for consistency.
* Windows `_putenv_s()` takes 2 arguments, not 3.
+ See MSVC documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/putenv-s-wputenv-s?view=msvc-170
+ POSIX `setenv()` takes `int overwrite`, but Windows `_putenv_s()` always overwrites.
* Avoid non-Standard zero-length arrays.
+ Followup to #74183 and #79792.
* Add `operator++()` to `unsized_it`.
+ The Standard requires this due to [N4981][] [move.iter.requirements]/1 "The template parameter `Iterator` shall
either meet the *Cpp17InputIterator* requirements ([input.iterators])
or model `input_iterator` ([iterator.concept.input])."
+ MSVC's STL requires this because it has a strengthened exception
specification in `move_iterator` that inspects the underlying iterator's
increment operator.
* `uniform_int_distribution` forbids `int8_t`/`uint8_t`.
+ See [N4981][] [rand.req.genl]/1.5. MSVC's STL enforces this.
+ Note that when changing the distribution's `IntType`, we need to be
careful to preserve the original value range of `[0, max_input]`.
* fstreams are constructible from `const fs::path::value_type*` on wide systems.
+ See [ifstream.cons], [ofstream.cons], [fstream.cons].
* In `msvc_stdlib_force_include.h`, map `_HAS_CXX23` to `TEST_STD_VER` 23 instead of 99.
+ On 2023-05-23, 71400505ca
started recognizing 23 as a distinct value.
* Fix test name typo: `destory_elements.pass.cpp` => `destroy_elements.pass.cpp`
[N4981]: https://wg21.link/N4981
This moves the definition of a `pair` constructor for `<tuple>` to
`<__utility/pair.h>` and uses the forward declaration of `pair` in
`<tuple>` instead of including the definition.
Implement [LWG3528](https://wg21.link/LWG3528).
Based on LWG3528(https://wg21.link/LWG3528) and
http://eel.is/c++draft/description#structure.requirements-9, the
standard allows to impose requirements, we constraint
`std::make_from_tuple` to make `std::make_from_tuple` SFINAE friendly
and also avoid worse diagnostic messages. We still keep the constraints
of `std::__make_from_tuple_impl` so that `std::__make_from_tuple_impl`
will have the same advantages when used alone.
---------
Signed-off-by: yronglin <yronglin777@gmail.com>
As pointed out by @Zingam the paper was implemented in libc++ as an
extension. This patch does the bookkeeping. The inital release version
is based on historical release dates.
Completes:
- Add a conditional noexcept specification to std::apply
I've structured this into a series of commits for even easier reviewing,
if that helps. I could easily split this up into separate PRs if
desired, but as this is low-risk with simple edits, I thought one PR
would be easiest.
* Drop unnecessary semicolons after function definitions.
* Cleanup comment typos.
* Cleanup `static_assert` typos.
* Cleanup test code typos.
+ There should be no functional changes, assuming I've changed all
occurrences.
* ~~Fix massive test code typos.~~
+ This was a real problem, but needed more surgery. I reverted those
changes here, and @philnik777 is fixing this properly with #73444.
* clang-formatting as requested by the CI.
This reduces the number of instantiations and also avoid blowing up
past the fold-expression limit of Clang.
This is NOT a general statement that we should strive to stay within
Clang's (sometimes way too small) limits, however in this case the
change will reduce the number of template instantiations while at the
same time doing that, which is good.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132509
Since LLVM 17 has been branched and is on the verge of being released,
we can drop the CI job that tests against Clang 15. I think the number
of cherry-picks to `release/17.x` will be a lot smaller now, so keeping
a Clang 15 job around for that purpose seems unnecessary.
As a fly-by, this patch also removes some Clang 15 workarounds and test
suite annotations as we usually do. It also removes some slightly older
gcc test suite annotations that were missed.
A few tests were also straightforward to translate to SFINAE tests
instead, so in a few cases I did that and removed the .fail.cpp test
entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153149
This has been done using the following commands
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)ptrdiff_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)max_align_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.,
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146550
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Otherwise, this breaks freestanding builds, where `main()` isn't mangled
specially and we need to assume that we have a `int main(int, char**)`
entry point in each test for things to work.
1. for constructors that takes cvref variation of tuple<UTypes...>, there
used to be two SFINAE helper _EnableCopyFromOtherTuple,
_EnableMoveFromOtherTuple. And the implementations of these two helpers
seem to slightly differ from the spec. But now, we need 4 variations.
Instead of adding another two, this change refactored it to a single one
_EnableCtrFromUTypesTuple, which directly maps to the spec without
changing the C++11 behaviour. However, we need the helper __copy_cvref_t
to get the type of std::get<i>(cvref tuple<Utypes...>) for different
cvref, so I made __copy_cvref_t to be available in C++11.
2. for constructors that takes variations of std::pair, there used to be
four helpers _EnableExplicitCopyFromPair, _EnableImplicitCopyFromPair,
_EnableImplicitMoveFromPair, _EnableExplicitMoveFromPair. Instead of
adding another four, this change refactored into two helper
_EnableCtrFromPair and _BothImplicitlyConvertible. This also removes the
need to use _nat
3. for const member assignment operator, since the requirement is very
simple, I haven't refactored the old code but instead directly adding
the new c++23 code.
4. for const swap, I pretty much copy pasted the non-const version to make
these overloads look consistent
5. while doing these change, I found two of the old constructors wasn't
marked constexpr for C++20 but they should. fixed them and added unit
tests
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116621
When merging the changes of <type_traits> header with the commits on
this header over the last month, several conflicts were mistaken
resolved and the wrong branch was picked while resolving conflicts,
which leads to CI failure. In order to resolve the conflicts properly
with qualification CI job, this change is reverted.
This reverts commit 95733a55b986e73f4d8f5314e0d4557d8ae0b226.
1. for constructors that takes cvref variation of tuple<UTypes...>, there
used to be two SFINAE helper _EnableCopyFromOtherTuple,
_EnableMoveFromOtherTuple. And the implementations of these two helpers
seem to slightly differ from the spec. But now, we need 4 variations.
Instead of adding another two, this change refactored it to a single one
_EnableCtrFromUTypesTuple, which directly maps to the spec without
changing the C++11 behaviour. However, we need the helper __copy_cvref_t
to get the type of std::get<i>(cvref tuple<Utypes...>) for different
cvref, so I made __copy_cvref_t to be available in C++11.
2. for constructors that takes variations of std::pair, there used to be
four helpers _EnableExplicitCopyFromPair, _EnableImplicitCopyFromPair,
_EnableImplicitMoveFromPair, _EnableExplicitMoveFromPair. Instead of
adding another four, this change refactored into two helper
_EnableCtrFromPair and _BothImplicitlyConvertible. This also removes the
need to use _nat
3. for const member assignment operator, since the requirement is very
simple, I haven't refactored the old code but instead directly adding
the new c++23 code.
4. for const swap, I pretty much copy pasted the non-const version to make
these overloads look consistent
5. while doing these change, I found two of the old constructors wasn't
marked constexpr for C++20 but they should. fixed them and added unit
tests
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116621
There is only compile-time tests in `dtor.pass.cpp`, so it could be made a
`dtor.compile.pass.cpp`. Instead, add a runtime test for testing the trivial
destructor behavior for `tuple`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109298
