The existing using _ForwardLike declaration already fails with a
subsitution failure. The LWG issue was filed to clarify what should
happen for non-referencable types.
Added test to verify libc++ is already enforcing the new Mandates.
Implements:
- LWG3757 What's the effect of std::forward_like<void>(x)
Closes: #105026
I made sure they all had some expected-error output in them. Many of
these tests would be better implemented as a positive test using SFINAE,
but this is beyond the scope of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153980
We should strive to have our own tests, except when there is overwhelming
value in using another standard library's existing tests. The reason is
that it ensures that implementations don't all start relying on the same
interpretation of the Standard.
The unique_ptr tests did not add any test coverage AFAICT, and the
forward_like tests were moved to the style used everywhere in the
libc++ test suite.
Note that I got to this because this actually broke a downstream
configuration where we use -ffreestanding. The signature of main()
was not consistent with the signature we (need to) use everywhere
in the test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134767
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844
We require move semantics in C++03 anyways, so let's enable them for the containers.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123802
This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.
This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.
We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.
In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.
The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.
This is a re-commit of
fc3090109643af8d2da9822d0f99c84742b9c877,
a571f82a50416b767fd3cce0fb5027bb5dfec58c,
64c045e25b8471bbb572bd29159c294a82a86a2, and
de6ddaeef3aaa8a9ae3663c12cdb57d9afc0f906,
and reverts aa643f455a5362de7189eac630050d2c8aefe8f2.
This change also includes a workaround for users using libc++ 3.1 and
earlier (!!), as apparently happens on AIX, where std::move sometimes
returns by value.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
Revert "Fixup D123950 to address revert of D123345"
This reverts commit aa643f455a5362de7189eac630050d2c8aefe8f2.
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
These [[nodiscard]] annotations are added as a conforming extension;
it's unclear whether the paper will actually be adopted and make them
mandatory, but they do seem like good ideas regardless.
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2351R0.pdf
This patch implements the paper's effect on:
- std::to_integer, std::to_underlying
- std::forward, std::move, std::move_if_noexcept
- std::as_const
- std::identity
The paper also affects (but libc++ does not yet have an implementation of):
- std::bit_cast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99895
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
These functions are key to allowing the use of rvalues and variadics
in C++03 mode. Everything works the same as in C++11, except for one
tangentially related case:
struct T {
T(T &&) = default;
};
In C++11, T has a deleted copy constructor. But in C++03 Clang gives
it both a move and a copy constructor. This seems reasonable enough
given the extensions it's using.
The other changes in this patch were the minimal set required
to keep the tests passing after the move/forward change. Most notably
the removal of the `__rv<unique_ptr>` hack that was present
in an attempt to make unique_ptr move only without language support.
llvm-svn: 364063
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Clang recently changed the way it outputs static assert diagnostics.
This patch fixes libc++'s -verify tests so they tolerate both the old
and new message format.
llvm-svn: 313499
Summary:
`std::move` and `std::forward` were not marked constexpr in C++11. This can be very damaging because it makes otherwise constant expressions non-constant. For example:
```
#include <utility>
template <class T>
struct Foo {
constexpr Foo(T&& tx) : t(std::move(tx)) {}
T t;
};
[[clang::require_constant_initialization]] Foo<int> f(42); // Foo should be constant initialized but C++11 move is not constexpr. As a result `f` is an unsafe global.
```
This patch applies `constexpr` to `move` and `forward` as an extension in C++11. Normally the library is not allowed to add `constexpr` because it may be observable to the user. In particular adding constexpr may cause valid code to stop compiling. However these problems only happen in more complex situations, like making `__invoke(...)` constexpr. `forward` and `move` are simply enough that applying `constexpr` is safe.
Note that libstdc++ has offered this extension since at least 4.8.1.
Most of the changes in this patch are simply test cleanups or additions. The main changes in the tests are:
* Fold all `forward_N.fail.cpp` tests into a single `forward.fail.cpp` test using -verify.
* Delete most `move_only_N.fail.cpp` tests because they weren't actually testing anything.
* Fold `move_copy.pass.cpp` and `move_only.pass.cpp` into a single `move.pass.cpp` test.
* Add return type and noexcept tests for `forward` and `move`.
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: K-ballo, loladiro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24637
llvm-svn: 282439
