Summary: The PlaceholderObjectFile has an assert in SetLoadAddress that fires if "m_base == value" is not true. To avoid this, we create check that the base address matches, and if it doesn't we clear the module that was found using the UUID so that we create a new PlaceholderObjectFile. Added a test to cover this issue.
Reviewers: labath, aadsm, dvlahovski
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68106
llvm-svn: 374242
Most of the secondary Makefiles we have are just a couple variable
definitions and then an include of Makefile.rules. This patch removes
most of the secondary Makefiles and replaces them with a direct
invocation of Makefile.rules in the main Makefile. The specificities
of each sub-build are listed right there on the recursive $(MAKE)
call. All the variables that matter are being passed automagically by
make as they have been passed on the command line. The only things you
need to specify are the variables customizating the Makefile.rules
logic for each image.
This patch also removes most of the clean logic from those Makefiles
and from Makefile.rules. The clean rule is not required anymore now
that we run the testsuite in a separate build directory that is wiped
with each run. The patch leaves a very crude version of clean in
Makefile.rules which removes everything inside of $(BUILDDIR). It does
this only when the $(BUILDDIR) looks like a sub-directory of our
standard testsuite build directory to be extra safe.
Reviewers: aprantl, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68558
llvm-svn: 374076
Summary:
TestLoadUsingPaths will fail if the build directory has
symlinks in its path, because the real paths reported by
the debugger won't match the symlink-laden paths it's expecting.
This can be solved just by using os.path.realpath on the base
path for the test.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68618
llvm-svn: 374007
Summary:
Someone wrote SetEffectiveSetEffectiveGroupID instead of SetEffectiveUserID.
After this fix, the android process list can show user names, e.g.
```
PID PARENT USER GROUP EFF USER EFF GROUP TRIPLE ARGUMENTS
====== ====== ========== ========== ========== ========== ============================== ============================
529 1 root 0 root 0 /sbin/ueventd
```
Reviewers: labath,clayborg,aadsm,xiaobai
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373953
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373931
Summary:
As we figured out in D67803, importing declarations from a temporary ASTContext that were originally from a persistent ASTContext
causes a bunch of duplicated declarations where we end up having declarations in the target AST that have no associated ASTImporter that
can complete them.
I haven't figured out how/if we can solve this in the current way we do things in LLDB, but in the modern-type-lookup this is solvable
as we have a saner architecture with the ExternalASTMerger. As we can (hopefully) make modern-type-lookup the default mode in the future,
I would say we try fixing this issue here. As we don't use the hack that was reinstated in D67803 during modern-type-lookup, the test case for this
is essentially just printing any kind of container in `std::` as we would otherwise run into the issue that required a hack like D67803.
What this patch is doing in essence is that instead of importing a declaration from a temporary ASTContext, we instead check if the
declaration originally came from a persistent ASTContext (e.g. the debug information) and we directly import from there. The ExternalASTMerger
is already connected with ASTImporters to these different sources, so this patch is essentially just two parts:
1. Mark our temporary ASTContext/ImporterSource as temporary when we import from the expression AST.
2. If the ExternalASTMerger sees we import from the expression AST, instead of trying to import these temporary declarations, check if we
can instead import from the persistent ASTContext that is already connected. This ensures that all records from the persistent source actually
come from the persistent source and are minimally imported in a way that allows them to be completed later on in the target AST.
The next step is to run the ASTImporter for these temporary expressions with the MinimalImport mode disabled, but that's a follow up patch.
This patch fixes most test failures with modern-type-lookup enabled by default (down to 73 failing tests, which includes the 22 import-std-module tests
which need special treatment).
Reviewers: shafik, martong
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: aprantl, rnkovacs, christof, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68326
llvm-svn: 373711
This will allow us to write reusable scripted ThreadPlans, since
you can use key/value pairs with known keys in the plan to parametrize
its behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68366
llvm-svn: 373675
Use this in the scripted breakpoint command. Added some tests for parsing
the key/value options. This uncovered a bug in handling parsing errors mid-line.
I also fixed that bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68363
llvm-svn: 373673
It is always doing work on behalf of another thread that presumably
has the mutex, so if it is calling SB API's it should have free access
to the mutex. This is the same decision as we made earlier with the
process RunLock.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68174
llvm-svn: 373280
Summary:
D67966 changes the output when dumping DWARF expressions and this updates basic_entry_values_x86_64 test to reflect this change.
llvm-svn: 373229
Summary:
The ExternalASTMerger should use the ASTImporterSharedState. This allows it to
handle std::pair in LLDB (but the rest of libc++ is still work in progress).
Reviewers: martong, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, christof, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68140
llvm-svn: 373193
A lot of commands are made up of CommandObjectMultiword with
subcommands. CommandObjectMultiword actually has some functionality
on its own that wasn't tested before.
llvm-svn: 373050
The story so far: LLDB's modern type lookup mode has no (as in, 0%) test
coverage. It was supposed to be tested by hardcoding the default to 'true' and then running
the normal LLDB tests, but to my knowledge no one is doing that. As a around 130 tests
seem to fail with this mode enabled, we also can't just enable it globally for now.
As we touch the surrounding code all the time and also want to refactor parts of it, we
should be a bit more ambitious with our testing efforts.
So this patch adds two basic tests that enable this mode and do some
basic expression parsing which should hopefully be basic enough to not
break anywhere but still lets us know if this mode works at all (i.e. setting up the
ExternalASTMerger in LLDB, using its basic import functionality to move declarations
around and do some lookups).
llvm-svn: 372869
This test streamlines our use of variables that are expected by
Makefile.rules throughout the test suite. Mostly it replaced
potentially dangerous overrides and updates of variables like CFLAGS
with safe assignments to variables reserved for this purpose like
CFLAGS_EXTRAS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67984
llvm-svn: 372795
r366433 broke support for the system debugserver. Although the change
was well-intended, it (presumably) unintentionally removed the logic to
copy over the debugserver. As a result, even with
LLDB_USE_SYSTEM_DEBUGSERVER enabled, we ended up building, signing and
using the just-built debugserver.
This patch partially recovers the old behavior: when
LLDB_USE_SYSTEM_DEBUGSERVER is set we don't build debugserver and just
copy over the system one.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67991
llvm-svn: 372786
The log channels change depending on platform, so listing them breaks on
some platforms. Let's just check that the 'lldb' and 'dwarf' channels are
there which are independent of platform.
llvm-svn: 372701
Summary:
In D61333 we dropped some code from ClangASTSource that checks if imported declarations
ended up in the right DeclContext. While this code wasn't tested by the test suite (or better, it was hit
by the test suite but we didn't have any checks that were affected) and the code seems pointless
(as usually Decls should end up in the right DeclContext), it actually broke the data formatters in LLDB
and causes a bunch of obscure bugs where structs suddenly miss all their members. The first report we got about
this was that printing a std::map doesn't work anymore when simply doing "expr m" (m is the std::map).
This patch reverts D61333 partly and reintroduces the check in a more stricter way (we actually check now that
we *move* the Decl and it is in a single DeclContext). This should fix all the problems we currently have until
we figure out how to properly fix the underlying issues. I changed the order of some std::map formatter tests
which is currently the most reliable way to test this problem (it's a tricky setup, see description below).
Fixes rdar://55502701 and rdar://55129537
--------------------------------------
Some more explanation what is actually going on and what is going wrong:
The situation we have is that if we have a `std::map m` and do a `expr m`, we end up seeing an empty map
(even if `m` has elements). The reason for this is that our data formatter sees that std::pair<int, int> has no
members. However, `frame var m` works just fine (and fixes all following `expr m` calls).
The reason for why `expr` breaks std::map is that we actually copy the std::map nodes in two steps in the
three ASTContexts that are involved: The debug information ASTContext (D-AST), the expression ASTContext
we created for the current expression (E-AST) and the persistent ASTContext we use for our $variables (P-AST).
When doing `expr m` we do a minimal import of `std::map` from D-AST to E-AST just do the type checking/codegen.
This copies std::map itself and does a minimal.import of `std::pair<int, int>` (that is, we don't actually import
the `first` and `second` members as we don't need them for anything). After the expression is done, we take
the expression result and copy it from E-AST to P-AST. This imports the E-AST's `std::pair` into P-AST which still
has no `first` and `second` as they are still undeserialized. Once we are in P-AST, the data formatter tries to
inspect `std::map` (and also `std::pair` as that's what the elements are) and it asks for the `std::pair` members.
We see that `std::pair` has undeserialized members and go to the ExternalASTSource to ask for them. However,
P-ASTs ExternalASTSource points to D-AST (and not E-AST, which `std::pair` came from). It can't point to E-AST
as that is only temporary and already gone (and also doesn't actually contain all decls we have in P-AST).
So we go to D-AST to get the `std::pair` members. The ASTImporter is asked to copy over `std::pair` members
and first checks if `std::pair` is already in P-AST. However, it only finds the std::pair we got from E-AST, so it
can't use it's map of already imported declarations and does a comparison between the `std::pair` decls we have
Because the ASTImporter thinks they are different declarations, it creates a second `std::pair` and fills in the
members `first` and `second` into the second `std::pair`. However, the data formatter is looking at the first
`std::pair` which still has no members as they are in the other decl. Now we pretend we have no declarations
and just print an empty map as a fallback.
The hack we had before fixed this issue by moving `first` and `second` to the first declaration which makes
the formatters happy as they can now see the members in the DeclContext they are querying.
Obviously this is a temporary patch until we get a real fix but I'm not sure what's the best way to fix this.
Implementing that the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl actually understands that the two std::pair's are the same
decl fixes the issue, but this doesn't fix the bug for all declarations. My preferred solution would be to
complete all declarations in E-AST before they get moved to P-AST (as we anyway have to do this from what I can
tell), but that might have unintended side-effects and not sure what's the best way to implement this.
Reviewers: friss, martong
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: aprantl, rnkovacs, christof, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits, shafik
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67803
llvm-svn: 372549
If one reverts D66398 then the TestDataFormatterStdList does fail - as the C++
formatters are initialized in the opposite order. But the current state of
trunk does not mind the order for C++ formatters.
It is using now a single std::vector as suggested by Pavel Labath.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66654
llvm-svn: 372424
These tests were temporarily missing when the big Makefile
simplification patch landed, so this just applies the same change
to these tests.
llvm-svn: 371738
Add support for evaluating DW_OP_entry_value. This involves parsing
DW_TAG_call_site_parameter and wiring the information through to the expression
evaluator.
rdar://54496008
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67376
llvm-svn: 371668
It seems when I restructured the test folders the functionalities/breakpoint
was deleted. This just reverts this change and re-adds the tests.
llvm-svn: 371512
The bugreport command exists to create domain-specific bug reports.
Currently it has one implementation for filing bugs on the unwinder. As
far as we can tell, it has never been of use. Although not exactly the
same as the reproducers, it's a bit confusing to have two parallel
command trees for (kind of) the same thing.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65469
llvm-svn: 371132
Summary:
We got a radar that printing small floats is not very user-friendly in LLDB as we print them with up to
100 leading zeroes before starting to use scientific notation. This patch changes this by already using
scientific notation when we hit 6 padding zeroes by default and moves this value into a target setting
so that users can just set this number back to 100 if they for some reason preferred the old behaviour.
This new setting is influencing how we format data, so that's why we have to reset the data visualisation
cache when it is changed.
Note that we have always been using scientific notation for large numbers because it seems that
the LLVM implementation doesn't support printing out the padding zeroes for them. I would have fixed
that if it was trivial, but looking at the LLVM implementation for this it seems that this is not as trivial
as it sounds. I would say we look into this if we ever get a bug report about someone wanting to have
a large amount of trailing zeroes in their numbers instead of using scientific notation.
Fixes rdar://39744137
Reviewers: #lldb, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67001
llvm-svn: 370880
Summary:
Instead of each test case knowing its depth relative to the test root,
we can just have dotest add the folder containing Makefile.rules to the
include path.
This was motivated by r370616, though I have been wanting to do this
ever since we moved to building tests out-of-tree.
The only manually modified files in this patch are lldbinline.py and
plugins/builder_base.py. The rest of the patch has been produced by this
shell command:
find . \( -name Makefile -o -name '*.mk' \) -exec sed --in-place -e '/LEVEL *:\?=/d' -e '1,2{/^$/d}' -e 's,\$(LEVEL)/,,' {} +
Reviewers: teemperor, aprantl, espindola, jfb
Subscribers: emaste, javed.absar, arichardson, christof, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67083
llvm-svn: 370845
Summary:
Right now our argument completions are rather cryptic for command options as they only list the letters:
```
(lldb) breakpoint set -
Available completions:
-G
-C
-c
-d
-i
-o
-q
-t
-x
[...]
```
With the new completion API we can easily extend this with the flag description so that it looks like this now:
```
(lldb) breakpoint set -
Available completions:
-G -- The breakpoint will auto-continue after running its commands.
-C -- A command to run when the breakpoint is hit, can be provided more than once, the commands will get run in order left to right.
-c -- The breakpoint stops only if this condition expression evaluates to true.
-d -- Disable the breakpoint.
-i -- Set the number of times this breakpoint is skipped before stopping.
-o -- The breakpoint is deleted the first time it stop causes a stop.
-q -- The breakpoint stops only for threads in the queue whose name is given by this argument.
-t -- The breakpoint stops only for the thread whose TID matches this argument.
-x -- The breakpoint stops only for the thread whose index matches this argument.
```
The same happens with --long-options now.
Reviewers: #lldb, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67063
llvm-svn: 370628
Summary:
As discussed on lldb-dev, this patch moves some LLDB tests into a hierarchy that more closely
resembles the commands we use in the LLDB interpreter. This patch should only move tests
that use the command interpreter and shouldn't touch any tests that primarily test the SB API.
Reviewers: #lldb, jfb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67033
llvm-svn: 370605
Summary:
While working on r370054, i've found it frustrating that the test output
was compeletely unhelpful in case of failures. Therefore I've decided to
improve that. In this I reuse the PExpectTest class, which was one of
our mechanisms for running pexpect tests, but which has gotten orhpaned
in the mean time.
I've replaced the existing send methods with a "expect" method, which
I've tried to design so that it has a similar interface to the expect
method in regular non-pexpect dotest tests (as it essentially does
something very similar). I've kept the ability to dump the transcript of
the pexpect communication to stdout in the "trace" mode, as that is a
very handy way to figure out what the test is doing. I've also removed
the "expect_string" method used in the existing tests -- I've found this
to be unhelpful because it hides the message that would be normally
displayed by the EOF exception. Although vebose, this message includes
some important information, like what strings we were searching for,
what were the last bits of lldb output, etc. I've also beefed up the
class to automatically disable the debug info test duplication, and
auto-skip tests when the host platform does not support pexpect.
This patch ports TestMultilineCompletion and TestIOHandlerCompletion to
the new class. It also deletes TestFormats as it is not testing anything
(definitely not formats) -- it was committed with the test code
commented out (r228207), and then the testing code was deleted in
r356000.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66954
llvm-svn: 370449
Disable the two failing tests until Raphael has a chance to investigate:
Failing Tests (2):
lldb-Suite :: functionalities/completion/TestCompletion.py
lldb-Suite :: functionalities/target_command/TestTargetCommand.py
llvm-svn: 370237
The refactoring patch for the option completion broke the completion
for ambiguous long options. As this feature was also untested (as
testing ambiguous options with the current test methods is impossible),
I just noticed now. This patch restores the old behavior and adds a
test for this feature.
llvm-svn: 370185
