added getName method in SBModule.h and .cpp in order to get the name of
the module from m_object_name.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bar Soloveychik <barsolo@fb.com>
Parsing of '::' scopes in TypeQuery was very naive and failed for names
with '::''s in template arguments. Interestingly, one of the functions
it was calling (Type::GetTypeScopeAndBasename) was already doing the
same thing, and getting it (mostly (*)) right. This refactors the
function so that it can return the scope results, fixing the parsing of
names like std::vector<int, std::allocator<int>>::iterator.
Two callers of GetTypeScopeAndBasename are deleted as the functions are
not used (I presume they stopped being used once we started pruning type
search results more eagerly).
(*) This implementation is still not correct when one takes c++
operators into account -- e.g., something like `X<&A::operator<>::T` is
a legitimate type name. We do have an implementation that is able to
handle names like these (CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName), but using it is
not trivial, because it is hidden in a language plugin and specific to
method name parsing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Buch <michaelbuch12@gmail.com>
This uses [teyit](https://pypi.org/project/teyit/) to modernize asserts,
as recommended by the [unittest release
notes](https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html#id3).
For example, `assertTrue(a == b)` is replaced with `assertEqual(a, b)`.
This produces better error messages, e.g. `error: unexpectedly found 1
and 2 to be different` instead of `error: False`.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
This commit improves upon cc0b5ebf7fc8, which added support for
specifying which libcxx to use when testing LLDB. That patch honored
requests by tests that had `USE_LIBCPP=1` defined in their makefiles.
Now, we also use a non-default libcxx if all conditions below are true:
1. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of libstdcpp
(USE_LIBSTDCPP=1).
2. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of the system's
library (USE_SYSTEM_STDLIB=1).
3. A path to libcxx was either provided by the user through CMake flags
or libcxx was built together with LLDB.
Condition (2) is new and introduced in this patch in order to support
tests that are either:
* Cross-platform (such as API/macosx/macCatalyst and
API/tools/lldb-server). The just-built libcxx is usually not built for
platforms other than the host's.
* Cross-language (such as API/lang/objc/exceptions). In this case, the
Objective C runtime throws an exceptions that always goes through the
system's libcxx, instead of the just built libcxx. Fixing this would
require either changing the install-name of the just built libcxx in Mac
systems, or tuning the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH variable at runtime.
Some other tests exposes limitations of LLDB when running with a debug
standard library. TestDbgInfoContentForwardLists had an assertion
removed, as it was checking for buggy LLDB behavior (which now
crashes). TestFixIts had a variable renamed, as the old name clashes
with a standard library name when debug info is present. This is a known
issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/34391.
For `TestSBModule`, the way the "main" module is found was changed to
look for the "a.out" module, instead of relying on the index being 0. In
some systems, the index 0 is dyld when a custom standard library is
used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132940
This commit improves upon cc0b5ebf7fc8, which added support for
specifying which libcxx to use when testing LLDB. That patch honored
requests by tests that had `USE_LIBCPP=1` defined in their makefiles.
Now, we also use a non-default libcxx if all conditions below are true:
1. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of libstdcpp
(USE_LIBSTDCPP=1).
2. The test is not explicitly requesting the use of the system's
library (USE_SYSTEM_STDLIB=1).
3. A path to libcxx was either provided by the user through CMake flags
or libcxx was built together with LLDB.
Condition (2) is new and introduced in this patch in order to support
tests that are either:
* Cross-platform (such as API/macosx/macCatalyst and
API/tools/lldb-server). The just-built libcxx is usually not built for
platforms other than the host's.
* Cross-language (such as API/lang/objc/exceptions). In this case, the
Objective C runtime throws an exceptions that always goes through the
system's libcxx, instead of the just built libcxx. Fixing this would
require either changing the install-name of the just built libcxx in Mac
systems, or tuning the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH variable at runtime.
Some other tests exposes limitations of LLDB when running with a debug
standard library. TestDbgInfoContentForwardLists had an assertion
removed, as it was checking for buggy LLDB behavior (which now
crashes). TestFixIts had a variable renamed, as the old name clashes
with a standard library name when debug info is present. This is a known
issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/34391.
For `TestSBModule`, the way the "main" module is found was changed to
look for the "a.out" module, instead of relying on the index being 0. In
some systems, the index 0 is dyld when a custom standard library is
used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132940
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
This patch introduces a new SBAPI method: `SBModule::IsFileBacked`
As the name suggests, it tells the user if the module's object file is
on disk or in memory.
rdar://68538278
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118261
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
