scalarizeBinop currently folds
vec_bo((inselt VecC0, V0, Index), (inselt VecC1, V1, Index))
->
inselt(vec_bo(VecC0, VecC1), scl_bo(V0,V1), Index)
This patch extends this to account for cases where one of the vec_bo operands is already all-constant and performs similar cost checks to determine if the scalar binop with a constant still makes sense:
vec_bo((inselt VecC0, V0, Index), VecC1)
->
inselt(vec_bo(VecC0, VecC1), scl_bo(V0,extractelt(V1,Index)), Index)
Fixes PR42174
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80885
Currently extracting a lane for a VPValue def is not supported, if it is
managed directly by VPTransformState (e.g. because it is created by a
VPInstruction or an external VPValue def).
For now, simply extract the requested lane. In the future, we should
also cache the extracted scalar values, similar to LV.
Reviewers: Ayal, rengolin, gilr, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80787
LV currently only supports power of 2 vectorization factors, which has
been made explicit with the assertion added in
840450549c9199150cbdee29acef756c19660ca1.
However, if the widest type is not a power-of-2 the computed MaxVF won't
be a power-of-2 either. This patch updates computeFeasibleMaxVF to
ensure the returned value is a power-of-2 by rounding down to the
nearest power-of-2.
Fixes PR46139.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80870
relevant aggregate build instructions only (UserCost).
Users are detected with findBuildAggregate routine and the trick is
that following SLP vectorization may end up vectorizing entire list
with smaller chunks. Cost adjustment then is applied for individual
chunks and these adjustments obviously have to be smaller than the
entire aggregate build cost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80773
If it turns out that we can do runtime checks, but there are no
runtime-checks to generate, set RtCheck.Need to false.
This can happen if we can prove statically that the pointers passed in
to canCheckPtrAtRT do not alias. This should not change any results, but
allows us to skip some work and assert that runtime checks are
generated, if LAA indicates that runtime checks are required.
Reviewers: anemet, Ayal
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79969
Note: This is a recommit of 259abfc7cbc11cd98c05b1eb8e4b3fb6a9664bc0,
with some suggested renaming.
If it turns out that we can do runtime checks, but there are no
runtime-checks to generate, set RtCheck.Need to false.
This can happen if we can prove statically that the pointers passed in
to canCheckPtrAtRT do not alias. This should not change any results, but
allows us to skip some work and assert that runtime checks are
generated, if LAA indicates that runtime checks are required.
Reviewers: anemet, Ayal
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79969
If a loop has a constant trip count known to be a multiple of MaxVF (times user
UF), LV infers that no tail will be generated for any chosen VF. This relies on
the chosen VF's being powers of 2 bound by MaxVF, and assumes MaxVF is a power
of 2. Make sure the latter holds, in particular when MaxVF is set by a memory
dependence distance which may not be a power of 2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80491
Currently we unconditionally get the first lane of the condition
operand, even if we later use the full vector condition. This can result
in some unnecessary instructions being generated.
Suggested as follow-up in D80219.
VPWidenSelectRecipe already contains a VPUser, but it is not used. This
patch updates the code related to VPWidenSelectRecipe to use VPUser for
its operands.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80219
As noted in D80236, moving the pass in the pipeline exposed this
shortcoming. Extra work to recalculate the alias results showed
up as a compile-time slowdown.
Summary:
When handling loops whose VF is 1, fold-tail vectorization sets the
backedge taken count of the original loop with a vector of a single
element. This causes type-mismatch during instruction generartion.
The purpose of this patch is toto address the case of VF==1.
Reviewer: Ayal (Ayal Zaks), bmahjour (Bardia Mahjour), fhahn (Florian Hahn), gilr (Gil Rapaport), rengolin (Renato Golin)
Reviewed By: Ayal (Ayal Zaks), bmahjour (Bardia Mahjour), fhahn (Florian Hahn)
Subscribers: Ayal (Ayal Zaks), rkruppe (Hanna Kruppe), bmahjour (Bardia Mahjour), rogfer01 (Roger Ferrer Ibanez), vkmr (Vineet Kumar), bollu (Siddharth Bhat), hiraditya (Aditya Kumar), llvm-commits (Mailing List llvm-commits)
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79976
This is a fix for PR45965 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45965 -
which was left out of D80106 because of a test failure.
SLP does its own mini-CSE after potentially creating redundant instructions,
so we need to wait for that to complete before running the verifier.
Otherwise, we will see a test failure for
test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/crash_vectorizeTree.ll (not changed here)
because a phi temporarily has identical but different incoming values for
the same incoming block.
A related, but independent, test that would have been altered here was
fixed with:
rG880df55
The test was escaping verification in SLP without this change because we
were not running verifyFunction() unless SLP actually changed the IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80401
The algorithm inside getVectorElementSize() is almost O(x^2) complexity and
when, for example, we compile MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/shared_sha256.c
with 1k instructions inside sha256_transform() function that resulted in almost
~800k iterations. The following change improves the algorithm with the map to
a liner complexity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80241
Combine the two API calls into one by introducing a structure to hold
the relevant data. This has the added benefit of moving the boiler
plate code for arguments and flags, into the constructors. This is
intended to be a non-functional change, but the complicated web of
logic involved here makes it very hard to guarantee.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79941
SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.
This patch was originally committed as b8a3c34eee06, but broke the
modules build, as LoopAccessAnalysis was using the Expander.
The code-gen part of LAA was moved to lib/Transforms recently, so this
patch can be landed again.
Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy.google
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537
This patch adds VPValue version of the instruction operands to
VPReplicateRecipe and uses them during code-generation.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80114
We can remove a dynamic memory allocation, by checking the number of
operands: no operands = all true, 1 operand = mask.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80110
LV considers an internally computed MaxVF to decide if a constant trip-count is
a multiple of any subsequently chosen VF, and conclude that no scalar remainder
iterations (tail) will be left for Fold Tail to handle. If an external VF is
provided via -force-vector-width, it must be considered instead of the internal
MaxVF.
If an external UF is provided via -force-vector-interleave, it too must be
considered in addition to MaxVF or user VF.
Fixes PR45679.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80085
verifyFunction/verifyModule don't assert or error internally. They
also don't print anything if you don't pass a raw_ostream to them.
So the caller needs to check the result and ideally pass a stream
to get the messages. Otherwise they're just really expensive no-ops.
I've filed PR45965 for another instance in SLPVectorizer
that causes a lit test failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80106
If both OpA and OpB is an add with NSW/NUW and with the same LHS operand,
we can guarantee that the transformation is safe if we can prove that OpA
won't overflow when IdxDiff added to the RHS of OpA.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79817
Now that load/store alignment is required, we no longer need most
of them. Also switch the getLoadStoreAlignment() helper to return
Align instead of MaybeAlign.
This is split off from D79799 - where I was proposing to fully iterate
over a function until there are no more transforms. I suspect we are
still going to want to do something like that eventually.
But we can achieve the same gains much more efficiently on the current
set of regression tests just by reversing the order that we visit the
instructions.
This may also reduce the motivation for D79078, but we are still not
getting the optimal pattern for a reduction.
The patch standardizes printing of VPRecipes a bit, by hoisting out the
common emission of \\l\"+\n. It simplifies the code and is also a first
step towards untangling printing from DOT format output, with the goal
of making the DOT output optional and to provide a more concise debug
output if DOT output is disabled.
Reviewers: gilr, Ayal, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78883
Summary:
Analyses that are statefull should not be retrieved through a proxy from
an outer IR unit, as these analyses are only invalidated at the end of
the inner IR unit manager.
This patch disallows getting the outer manager and provides an API to
get a cached analysis through the proxy. If the analysis is not
stateless, the call to getCachedResult will assert.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, eraman, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72893
This was reverted because of a miscompilation. At closer inspection, the
problem was actually visible in a changed llvm regression test too. This
one-line follow up fix/recommit will splat the IV, which is what we are trying
to avoid if unnecessary in general, if tail-folding is requested even if all
users are scalar instructions after vectorisation. Because with tail-folding,
the splat IV will be used by the predicate of the masked loads/stores
instructions. The previous version omitted this, which caused the
miscompilation. The original commit message was:
If tail-folding of the scalar remainder loop is applied, the primary induction
variable is splat to a vector and used by the masked load/store vector
instructions, thus the IV does not remain scalar. Because we now mark
that the IV does not remain scalar for these cases, we don't emit the vector IV
if it is not used. Thus, the vectoriser produces less dead code.
Thanks to Ayal Zaks for the direction how to fix this.
Currently LAA's uses of ScalarEvolutionExpander blocks moving the
expander from Analysis to Transforms. Conceptually the expander does not
fit into Analysis (it is only used for code generation) and
runtime-check generation also seems to be better suited as a
transformation utility.
Reviewers: Ayal, anemet
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78460
The failing assertion has been fixed and the problematic test case has
been added.
This reverts the revert commit fc44617f28847417e55836193bbe8e9c3f09eca9.
In order to reduce the API surface area (preparation for D78460), remove
a addRuntimeChecks() function and do the additional check in the single
caller.
Reviewers: Ayal, anemet
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79679
As with the extractelement patterns that are currently in vector-combine,
there are going to be several possible variations on this theme. This
should be the clearest, simplest example.
Scalarization is the right direction for target-independent canonicalization,
and InstCombine has some of those folds already, but it doesn't do this.
I proposed a similar transform in D50992. Here in vector-combine, we can
check the cost model to be sure it's profitable, so there should be less risk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79452
The original patch (rG86dfbc676ebe) exposed an existing bug:
we could wrongly cast a constant expression to BinaryOperator
because the pattern matching allows that. This adds a check
for that case, and there's a reduced test case to verify no
crashing.
Original commit message:
This builds on the or-reduction bailout that was added with D67841.
We still do not have IR-level load combining, although that could
be a target-specific enhancement for -vector-combiner.
The heuristic is narrowly defined to catch the motivating case from
PR39538:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39538
...while preserving existing functionality.
That is, there's an unmodified test of pure load/zext/store that is
not seen in this patch at llvm/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/cast.ll.
That's the reason for the logic difference to require the 'or'
instructions. The chances that vectorization would actually help a
memory-bound sequence like that seem small, but it looks nicer with:
vpmovzxwd (%rsi), %xmm0
vmovdqu %xmm0, (%rdi)
rather than:
movzwl (%rsi), %eax
movl %eax, (%rdi)
...
In the motivating test, we avoid creating a vector mess that is
unrecoverable in the backend, and SDAG forms the expected bswap
instructions after load combining:
movzbl (%rdi), %eax
vmovd %eax, %xmm0
movzbl 1(%rdi), %eax
vmovd %eax, %xmm1
movzbl 2(%rdi), %eax
vpinsrb $4, 4(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vpinsrb $8, 8(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vpinsrb $12, 12(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vmovd %eax, %xmm2
movzbl 3(%rdi), %eax
vpinsrb $1, 5(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $2, 9(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $3, 13(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpslld $24, %xmm0, %xmm0
vpmovzxbd %xmm1, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[3],zero,zero,zero
vpslld $16, %xmm1, %xmm1
vpor %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
vpinsrb $1, 6(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm1
vmovd %eax, %xmm2
vpinsrb $2, 10(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $3, 14(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $1, 7(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm2
vpinsrb $2, 11(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm2
vpmovzxbd %xmm1, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[3],zero,zero,zero
vpinsrb $3, 15(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm2
vpslld $8, %xmm1, %xmm1
vpmovzxbd %xmm2, %xmm2 # xmm2 = xmm2[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm2[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm2[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm2[3],zero,zero,zero
vpor %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1
vpor %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
vmovdqu %xmm0, (%rsi)
movl (%rdi), %eax
movl 4(%rdi), %ecx
movl 8(%rdi), %edx
movbel %eax, (%rsi)
movbel %ecx, 4(%rsi)
movl 12(%rdi), %ecx
movbel %edx, 8(%rsi)
movbel %ecx, 12(%rsi)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78997
If tail-folding of the scalar remainder loop is applied, the primary induction
variable is splat to a vector and used by the masked load/store vector
instructions, thus the IV does not remain scalar. Because we now mark
that the IV does not remain scalar for these cases, we don't emit the vector IV
if it is not used. Thus, the vectoriser produces less dead code.
Thanks to Ayal Zaks for the direction how to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78911
This builds on the or-reduction bailout that was added with D67841.
We still do not have IR-level load combining, although that could
be a target-specific enhancement for -vector-combiner.
The heuristic is narrowly defined to catch the motivating case from
PR39538:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39538
...while preserving existing functionality.
That is, there's an unmodified test of pure load/zext/store that is
not seen in this patch at llvm/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/cast.ll.
That's the reason for the logic difference to require the 'or'
instructions. The chances that vectorization would actually help a
memory-bound sequence like that seem small, but it looks nicer with:
vpmovzxwd (%rsi), %xmm0
vmovdqu %xmm0, (%rdi)
rather than:
movzwl (%rsi), %eax
movl %eax, (%rdi)
...
In the motivating test, we avoid creating a vector mess that is
unrecoverable in the backend, and SDAG forms the expected bswap
instructions after load combining:
movzbl (%rdi), %eax
vmovd %eax, %xmm0
movzbl 1(%rdi), %eax
vmovd %eax, %xmm1
movzbl 2(%rdi), %eax
vpinsrb $4, 4(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vpinsrb $8, 8(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vpinsrb $12, 12(%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
vmovd %eax, %xmm2
movzbl 3(%rdi), %eax
vpinsrb $1, 5(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $2, 9(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $3, 13(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpslld $24, %xmm0, %xmm0
vpmovzxbd %xmm1, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[3],zero,zero,zero
vpslld $16, %xmm1, %xmm1
vpor %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
vpinsrb $1, 6(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm1
vmovd %eax, %xmm2
vpinsrb $2, 10(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $3, 14(%rdi), %xmm1, %xmm1
vpinsrb $1, 7(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm2
vpinsrb $2, 11(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm2
vpmovzxbd %xmm1, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm1[3],zero,zero,zero
vpinsrb $3, 15(%rdi), %xmm2, %xmm2
vpslld $8, %xmm1, %xmm1
vpmovzxbd %xmm2, %xmm2 # xmm2 = xmm2[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm2[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm2[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm2[3],zero,zero,zero
vpor %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1
vpor %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
vmovdqu %xmm0, (%rsi)
movl (%rdi), %eax
movl 4(%rdi), %ecx
movl 8(%rdi), %edx
movbel %eax, (%rsi)
movbel %ecx, 4(%rsi)
movl 12(%rdi), %ecx
movbel %edx, 8(%rsi)
movbel %ecx, 12(%rsi)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78997
getScalarizationOverhead is only ever called with vectors (and we already had a load of cast<VectorType> calls immediately inside the functions).
Followup to D78357
Reviewed By: @samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79341
