Found while running libc++'s tests with MSVC's STL.
`ranges::rotate_copy` takes `forward_iterator`s as this test's comment
banner correctly depicts. However, this test had bogus assertions
expecting that `ranges::rotate_copy` would be constrained away for
not-quite-**bidi** iterators. @philnik777 confirmed that these were
copy-paste relics from the `ranges::reverse_copy` test.
I fixed this by replacing the assertions with the test types that aren't
quite **forward** iterators/ranges. Additionally, I noticed that the
top-level `test()` function was missing coverage with the weakest
possible `forward_iterator<int*>`.
This revealed that the product code in `ranges_rotate_copy.h` was
similarly damaged. In addition to fixing it by taking `forward_iterator`
and `forward_range` as depicted in the Standard, this drops the
inclusion of `<__iterator/reverse_iterator.h>` as this algorithm doesn't
need `std::__reverse_range`.
This commit does a pass of clang-format over files in libc++ that
don't require major changes to conform to our style guide, or for
which we're not overly concerned about conflicting with in-flight
patches or hindering the git blame.
This roughly covers:
- benchmarks
- range algorithms
- concepts
- type traits
I did a manual verification of all the changes, and in particular I
applied clang-format on/off annotations in a few places where the
result was less readable after than before. This was not necessary
in a lot of places, however I did find that clang-format had pretty
bad taste when it comes to formatting concepts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153140
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
