Currently there is a -emit-header-module mode, which can combine several
headers together as a module interface. However, this breaks our
assumption (for standard c++ modules) about module interface. The module
interface should come from a module interface unit. And if it is a
header, it should be a header unit. And currently we have no ideas to
combine several headers together.
So I think this mode is an experimental one and it is not maintained and
it is not used. So it will be better to remove them.
Reviewed By: Bigcheese, dblaikie, bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137609
While working on D53847, I noticed that this test would fail once we
started recognizing the types in the modified `export` statement [0].
The tests would fail because Clang would emit a "declaration does not
declare anything" diagnostic instead of the expected namespace scope
diagnostic.
I believe that the test is currently incorrectly passing because Clang
doesn't parse the type and therefore doesn't treat the statement as a
declaration. My understanding is that the intention of this test case is
that it wants to export a `struct` type, which I believe requires a
`struct` keyword, even for types with template parameters. With this
change, the only error with these two statements should be the
namespace scope issue.
[0]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53847?id=462032#inline-1297053
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134578
This adjusts the handling for:
export module M;
export namespace {};
export namespace N {};
export using namespace N;
In the first case, we were allowing empty anonymous namespaces
as part of an extension allowing empty top-level entities, but that seems
inappropriate in this case, since the linkage would be internal for the
anonymous namespace. We now report an error for this.
The second case was producing a warning diagnostic that this was
accepted as an extension - however the C++20 standard does allow this
as well-formed.
In the third case we keep the current practice that this is accepted with a
warning (as an extension). The C++20 standard says it's an error.
We also ensure that using decls are only applied to items with external linkage.
This adjusts error messages for exports involving redeclarations in modules to
be more specific about the reason that the decl has been rejected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119
Since only the decls inhabit in a namespace scope could be exported, it
is not meaningful to check it in CheckRedeclarationExported, which
implements [module.interface]/p6.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118120
This fixes bug 47716.
According to [module.interface]p2, it is meaningless to export an entity
which is not in namespace scope.
The reason why the compiler crashes is that the compiler missed
ExportDecl when the compiler traverse the subclass of DeclContext. So
here is the crash.
Also, the patch implements [module.interface]p6 in
Sema::CheckRedeclaration* functions.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112903
const-qualified type is not implicitly given internal linkage. But a
variable template declared 'static' is.
This reinstates part of r359048, reverted in r359076.
llvm-svn: 359260
The change breaks libc++ with the follwing error:
In file included from valarray:4:
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1062:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of 'valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t))
^
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1063:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of '~valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::~valarray())
llvm-svn: 359076
