"__cmpccxadd_epi*" -> "_cmpccxadd_epi*"
This is to align with other intrinsics to follow single leading "_" style. Gcc
and intrinsic guide website will also apply this change.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke, skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140281
The option from D116070 does not work as intended and will not be needed when
hidden visibility is used. A function needs ENDBR if it may be reached
indirectly. If we make ThinLTO combine the address-taken property (close to
`!GV.use_empty() && !GV.hasAtLeastLocalUnnamedAddr()`), then the condition can
be expressed with:
`AddressTaken || (!F.hasLocalLinkage() && (VisibleToRegularObj || !F.hasHiddenVisibility()))`
The current `F.hasAddressTaken()` condition does not take into acount of
address-significance in another bitcode file or ELF relocatable file.
For the Linux kernel, it uses relocatable linking. lld/ELF uses a
conservative approach by setting all `VisibleToRegularObj` to true.
Using the non-relocatable semantics may under-estimate
`VisibleToRegularObj`. As @pcc mentioned on
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1737#issuecomment-1343414686
, we probably need a symbol list to supply additional
`VisibleToRegularObj` symbols (not part of the relocatable LTO link).
Reviewed By: samitolvanen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140363
We support AMX-FP16 isa in https://reviews.llvm.org/D135941 now.
The old intrinsic interface need to manually write tile registers.
So we support its new intrinsic interface to let it be able to do register allocation.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138987
This used to be required, but the difference between asserts/!asserts
builds no longer exists for %clang_cc1 (only for %clang), so they pass
just fine without this flag.
This avoids depending on int->float or double->float conversion.
Improving codegen with #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON.
Really we should improve constant folding somewhere, but this was
a cheap and easy improvement.
Fixes PR59052.
Updated the RUN line in several test cases to use the new PM syntax
opt -passes=<pipeline>
instead of the deprecated syntax
opt -pass1 -pass2
This was not a complete cleanup in clang/test. But just a swipe using
some simple search-and-replace. Mainly for RUN lines involving
-mem2reg, -instnamer and -early-cse.
We only really need avx512bw for masking 256 or 512 bit GFNI
instructions due to the need for v32i1 or v64i1.
I wanted to enable 128-bit intrinsics with avx512vl, but the
__builtin_ia32_selectb_128 used in the header file requires avx512bw.
The codegen test for the same is also not using a masked instruction
because vselect with v16i1 mask and v16i8 is not legal so is expanded
before isel. To fix these issues we need a mask specific builtin and a
mask specific ISD opcode.
Fixes PR58687.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137036
This is an alternative of D120395 and D120411.
Previously we use `__bfloat16` as a typedef of `unsigned short`. The
name may give user an impression it is a brand new type to represent
BF16. So that they may use it in arithmetic operations and we don't have
a good way to block it.
To solve the problem, we introduced `__bf16` to X86 psABI and landed the
support in Clang by D130964. Now we can solve the problem by switching
intrinsics to the new type.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132329
Seeing the wrong instruction for this name in IR is confusing.
Most of the tests are not even checking a subsequent use of
the value, so I just deleted the over-specified CHECKs.
When F calls G calls H, G is nounwind, and G is inlined into F, then the
inlined call-site to H should be effectively nounwind so as not to lose
information during inlining.
If H itself is nounwind (which often happens when H is an intrinsic), we
no longer mark the callsite explicitly as nounwind. Previously, there
were cases where the inlined call-site of H differs from a pre-existing
call-site of H in F *only* in the explicitly added nounwind attribute,
thus preventing common subexpression elimination.
v2:
- just check CI->doesNotThrow
v3 (resubmit after revert at 344378808778c61d5599f4e0ac783ef7e6f8ed05):
- update Clang tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129860
These features require that all object files are compiled with the support. When
the feature is disabled for an object file, the merge behavior should treat the
file having a value of 0 (see D129911).
Reviewed By: xiangzhangllvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130065
When assertions are enabled, clang will perform RoundTrip for CompilerInvocation argument generation. ibt-seal flags are currently missing in this argument generation, and because of that, the feature doesn't get enabled for these cases. Performing RoundTrip is the default for assert builds, rendering the feature broken in these scenarios.
This patch fixes this and adds a test to properly verify that modules are being generated with the flag when -mibt-seal is used.
Please, add any known relevant reviewer which I may have missed.
[1] - https://reviews.llvm.org/D116070
Reviewed By: pengfei, gftg, aaron.ballman, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118052
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
