This commit combines the initial commit (7c240de609af), a fix for x86_64 Linux
(3a0581501e76) and a fix for thinko in a last minute rewrite that I really
should have run the testsuite on.
Also, make sure that all the "I need to step over watchpoint" plans execute
before we call a public stop. Otherwise, e.g. if you have N watchpoints and
a Signal, the signal stop info will get us to stop with the watchpoints in a
half-done state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130674
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected stop reason. This is similar to the assertState helper that
was added in ce825e46743b.
Before:
self.assertEqual(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: 5 != 10
After:
self.assertStopReason(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: signal (5) != instrumentation (10)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131083
This reverts commit 5778ada8e54edb2bc2869505b88a959d1915c02f.
The watchpoint tests all stall on aarch64-ubuntu bots. Reverting till I can
get my hands on an system to test this out.
Since we want to present the "new & old" values for watchpoint hits, on architectures,
including the ARM family, that stop before the triggering instruction is run, we need
to single step over the instruction before stopping for realz. This was incorrectly
done directly in the StopInfoWatchpoint::ShouldStop. That causes problems if more than
one thread stops "for a reason" at the same time as the watchpoint, since the other actions
didn't expect the process to make progress in this part of the execution control machinery.
The correct way to do this is to schedule the step over using ThreadPlans, and then to restore
the stop info after that plan stops, so that the rest of the stop info actions can happen when
all the other threads have handled their immediate actions as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129814
This is currently being done in an ad hoc way, and so for some
commands it isn't being checked. We have the info to make this check,
since commands are supposed to add their arguments to the m_arguments
field of the CommandObject. This change uses that info to check whether
the command received arguments in error.
A handful of commands weren't defining their argument types, I also had
to fix them. And a bunch of commands were checking for arguments by
hand, so I removed those checks in favor of the CommandObject one. That
also meant I had to change some tests that were checking for the ad hoc
error outputs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128453
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected state.
Currently, tests are using assertEqual which results in a cryptic error
message: "AssertionError: 5 != 10". Even when a test provides a message
to make it clear why a particular state is expected, you still have to
figure out which of the two was the expected state, and what the other
value corresponds to.
We have a function in lldbutil that helps you convert the state number
into a user readable string. This patch adds a wrapper around
assertEqual specifically for comparing states and reporting better error
messages.
The aforementioned error message now looks like this: "AssertionError:
stopped (5) != exited (10)". If the user provided a message, that
continues to get printed as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127355
Skip all watchpoint hit-count/ignore-count tests for multithreaded
API tests for now on arm64 Darwin.
On AArch64, insns that trigger a WP are rolled back and we are
notified. lldb needs to disable the WP, insn step, re-enable it,
then report it to the user. lldb only does this full step action
for the "selected thread", and so when a program stops with
multiple threads hitting a stop reason, some of them watchpoints,
any non-selected-thread will not be completed in this way. But
all threads with the initial watchpoint exception will have their
hit-count/ignore-counts updated. When we resume execution, the
other threads sitting at the instruction will again execute &
trigger the WP exceptoin again, repeating until we've gone through
all of the threads.
This bug is being tracked in llvm.org/pr49433 and inside apple
in rdar://93863107
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
AArch64 architecture support virtual addresses with some of the top bits ignored.
These ignored bits can host memory tags or bit masks that can serve to check for
authentication of address integrity. We need to clear away the top ignored bits
from watchpoint address to reliably hit and set watchpoints on addresses
containing tags or masks in their top bits.
This patch adds support to watch tagged addresses on AArch64/Linux.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101361
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.
Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.
This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.
I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.
These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
Explicitly copy dbregs to new threads to ensure that watchpoints
are propagated properly. Fixes the test failure due to apparent kernel
race between reporting a new thread and resuming main thread execution
that makes implicit inheritance of dbregs unreliable. By copying them
explicitly, we ensure that the new thread correctly respects watchpoints
that were set after the thread was created but before it was reported.
The code is copied from the NetBSD plugin and modernized to use
llvm::Error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91032
Make category-specifying files visible. There is really no good reason
to keep them hidden, and having them visible increases the chances
that someone will actually spot them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91065
TestWatchpointMultipleThreads currently accounts for two scenarios:
setting the watchpoint before a new thread starts (presumably, verifying
that it will be propagated to the new thread) and setting it after
the thread starts (presumably, verifying that a new watchpoint is set
on all threads). However, the latter test currently assumes that
the thread will be reported to the debugger before the breakpoint is
hit. This is not the case on FreeBSD and NetBSD.
On NetBSD, new threads do not inherit debug registers from their parent
threads. Instead, LLDB copies them manually after the new thread is
reported. Since the thread is actually reported after the second
breakpoint location, both tests effectively check the same behavior
(i.e. watchpoint being set before the new thread is reported).
On FreeBSD, new threads inherit debug registers and we seem to hit
an interesting race condition. While the thread is reported after
the breakpoint is hit, the kernel seems to construct it and copy
the debug register before that happens. As a result, setting
the watchpoint at the second breakpoint location modifies the debug
registers of the first thread after they have been copied to the second
thread but before the debugger is aware of it. Therefore,
the watchpoint is not propagated to the second thread and the test
fails.
Extend the test to cover all three possible scenarios: setting
watchpoint before the thread is lanched, after it is launched but before
it is guaranteed to have started and after it has actually started. Add
a second barrier to account for the last case. This should ensure that
the second assumption (i.e. that the watchpoint is set on all currently
known threads) is actually tested on FreeBSD and NetBSD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91030
The new FreeBSDRemote plugin has reached feature parity on i386
and amd64 targets. Use it by default on these architectures, while
allowing the use of the legacy plugin via FREEBSD_LEGACY_PLUGIN envvar.
Revisit the method of switching plugins. Apparently, the return value
of PlatformFreeBSD::CanDebugProcess() is what really decides whether
the legacy or the new plugin is used.
Update the test status. Reenable the tests that were previously
disabled on FreeBSD and do not cause hangs or are irrelevant to FreeBSD.
Mark all tests that fail reliably as expectedFailure. For now, tests
that are flaky (i.e. produce unstable results) are left enabled
and cause unpredictable test failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90757
Replace the inline x86 watchpoint handling code with the reusable
NativeRegisterContextWatchpoint_x86. Implement watchpoint support
in NativeThreadFreeBSD and SIGTRAP handling for watchpoints.
Un-skip all concurrent_events tests as they pass with the new plugin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90102
Skip tests or parts thereof that aren't expected to work when run from a
reproducer. Also improve the doc comments in configuration.py to prevent
mistakes in the future.
Summary:
Around a third of our test sources have LLVM license headers. This patch removes those headers from all test
sources and also fixes any tests that depended on the length of the license header.
The reasons for this are:
* A few tests verify line numbers and will start failing if the number of lines in the LLVM license header changes. Once I landed my patch for valid SourceLocations in debug info we will probably have even more tests that verify line numbers.
* No other LLVM project is putting license headers in its test files to my knowledge.
* They make the test sources much more verbose than they have to be. Several tests have longer license headers than the actual test source.
For the record, the following tests had their line numbers changed to pass with the removal of the license header:
lldb-api :: functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_by_line_and_column/TestBreakpointByLineAndColumn.py
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestGDBRemoteRepro.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestMultipleTargets.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestReuseDirectory.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook.test
lldb-api :: lang/objc/exceptions/TestObjCExceptions.py
Reviewers: #lldb, espindola, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74839
Summary:
The error message from the construct `assertTrue(a == b, "msg") ` are nearly always completely useless for actually debugging the issue.
This patch is just replacing this construct (and similar ones like `assertTrue(a != b, ...)` with the proper call to assertEqual or assertNotEquals.
This patch was mostly written by a shell script with some manual verification afterwards:
```
lang=python
import sys
def sanitize_line(line):
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " == " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertEquals(")
line = line.replace(" == ", ", ", 1)
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " != " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertNotEqual(")
line = line.replace(" != ", ", ", 1)
return line
for a in sys.argv[1:]:
with open(a, "r") as f:
lines = f.readlines()
with open(a, "w") as f:
for line in lines:
f.write(sanitize_line(line))
```
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74475
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.
This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:
```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151
