Rename CalleeSavedRegs defs to avoid being overly specific:
* CSR_AMDGPU_AGPRs_32_255 => CSR_AMDGPU_AGPRs
* CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs_30_31 + CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs_32_105 => CSR_AMDGPU_SGPRs
* CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_SGPRs_4_29 + CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_SGPRs_64_105 =>
CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_SGPRs
* CSR_AMDGPU_HighRegs => CSR_AMDGPU
* CSR_AMDGPU_HighRegs_With_AGPRs => CSR_AMDGPU_GFX90AInsts
* CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_With_AGPRs => CSR_AMDGPU_SI_Gfx_GFX90AInsts
Introduce a class RegMask to mark the cases where we use the
CalleeSavedRegs class purely as an expedient way to produce a mask.
Update the names of these masks to not mention "CSR". Other targets also
seem to do this, so a reasonable alternative is to actually update
table-gen to include a new class to do this explicitly, but the current
approach seems harmless so I opted to just make it more explicit.
Reviewed By: arsenm, sebastian-ne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109008
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy
bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope
the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.
Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
This is already deprecated, so remove code working on this.
Also update the tests by using S_CBRANCH_EXECZ instead of SI_MASK_BRANCH.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97545
The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
Summary:
Extend cachepolicy operand in the new VMEM buffer intrinsics
to supply information whether the buffer data is swizzled.
Also, propagate this information to MIR.
Intrinsics updated:
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_store
Furthermore, disable merging of VMEM buffer instructions
in SI Load/Store optimizer, if the "swizzled" bit on the instruction
is on.
The default value of the bit is 0, meaning that data in buffer
is linear and buffer instructions can be merged.
There is no difference in the generated code with this commit.
However, in the future it will be expected that front-ends
use buffer intrinsics with correct "swizzled" bit set.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, tpr
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, arphaman, jfb, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68200
llvm-svn: 373491
