If we can not prove that f16 operands of a buildvector are canonicalized, then we can not lower into a V_PACK. In this scenario, we would previously lower into some combination of and(sdwa), shr, or. This patch allows for matching into V_PERM instead.
Change-Id: Ifa4a74fdb81ef44f22ba490c7fdf81ec8aebc945
We form VOPD instructions in the GCNCreateVOPD pass by combining
back-to-back component instructions. There are strict register
constraints for creating a legal VOPD, namely that the matching operands
(e.g. src0x and src0y, src1x and src1y) must be in different register
banks. We add a PostRA scheduler
mutation to put possible VOPD components back-to-back.
Depends on D128442, D128270
Reviewed By: #amdgpu, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128656
This includes:
- New llvm.amdgcn.image.msaa.load.* intrinsics
- NSA changes, because MIMG-NSA is now limited to 3 dwords
- Split CD forms of IMAGE_SAMPLE instructions out into separate
test files since they are no longer supported in GFX11
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127837
Previously SIFoldOperands::foldInstOperand would only fold a
non-inlinable immediate into a single user, so as not to increase code
size by adding the same 32-bit literal operand to many instructions.
This patch removes that restriction, so that a non-inlinable immediate
will be folded into any number of users. The rationale is:
- It reduces the number of registers used for holding constant values,
which might increase occupancy. (On the other hand, many of these
registers are SGPRs which no longer affect occupancy on GFX10+.)
- It reduces ALU stalls between the instruction that loads a constant
into a register, and the instruction that uses it.
- The above benefits are expected to outweigh any increase in code size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114643
Add maximum NSA size limit as an ISA feature.
Use this to reduce NSA usage on GFX10.1 to avoid stability issues
with 4 and 5 dwords NSA instructions.
Maintain use of longer NSA instructions on GFX10.3.
Note: this also contains some minor fixes for GlobalISel which
did not work correctly with non-NSA form instructions on GFX10.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103348
Avoid having to round up to v8f32/VReg_256 when only 5 VGPRs are
required for a MIMG address operand.
Maintain _V8 instruction variants of pseudo instructions allowing
assembly prior to GFX10 to work as-is. Currently the validator
can tell for GFX10 what the correct size is, so will disallow
oversize address registers.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103672
the compilation time and there is no case for which we see any improvement in
performance. This patch removes this pass and its associated test cases from
the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101313
Change-Id: I0599169a7609c19a887f8d847a71e664030cc141
This reverts commit ca907bfb57d8ad3ec3bcc2cff2abab7b1b933af6.
According to michel.daenzer,
> This completely broke the Mesa radeonsi driver on Navi 14. Xorg +
> xterm come up with major corruption & psychedelic colours.
When memory operations are outstanding on function calls, either the
caller or the callee can insert a waitcnt to ensure that all reads are
finished.
Calls need some time to be executed, so if the callee inserts the
waitcnt, filling the instruction buffer and waiting for memory will be
interleaved, hiding some latency. This comes at the cost of having a
waitcnt inside functions that may not be needed as no memory operations
are outstanding.
For function calls, this is already implemented. The same principal
applies to returns: If the caller inserts a waitcnt after the call, the
callee does not have to wait and the return and memory operation can be
run in parallel.
This commit implements waiting in the caller after returning from a
function call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87674
This is the slowest operation in the already slow pass.
Instead of sorting just put a stall list into an ordered
map.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86253
