This patch allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits in cases where the ISD::SRL source operand has other uses, enabling us to peek through the shifted value if we don't demand all the bits/elts.
This is another step towards removing SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits and just using TargetLowering::SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits.
There a few cases where we end up with extra register moves which I think we can accept in exchange for the increased ILP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77804
Fold immediates regardless of how many uses they have. This is expected
to increase overall code size, but decrease register usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114644
Previously SIFoldOperands::foldInstOperand would only fold a
non-inlinable immediate into a single user, so as not to increase code
size by adding the same 32-bit literal operand to many instructions.
This patch removes that restriction, so that a non-inlinable immediate
will be folded into any number of users. The rationale is:
- It reduces the number of registers used for holding constant values,
which might increase occupancy. (On the other hand, many of these
registers are SGPRs which no longer affect occupancy on GFX10+.)
- It reduces ALU stalls between the instruction that loads a constant
into a register, and the instruction that uses it.
- The above benefits are expected to outweigh any increase in code size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114643
Code using indirect calls is broken without this, and there isn't
really much value in supporting the old attempt to vary the argument
placement based on uses. This resulted in more argument shuffling code
anyway.
Also have the option stop implying all inputs need to be passed. This
will no rely on the amdgpu-no-* attributes to avoid passing
unnecessary values.
Use GCNHazardRecognizer in postra sched.
Updated tests for the new schedules.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109536
Change-Id: Ia86ba2ae168f12fb34b4d8efdab491f84d936cde
These used to consistently be zeroed pre-gfx9, but gfx9 made the
situation complicated since now some still do and some don't. This
also manages to pick up a few cases that the pattern fails to optimize
away.
We handle some cases with instruction patterns, but some get
through. In particular this improves the integer cases.
Similar to D96622, we're better off just promoting uaddsat(x,y) -> umin(add(x,y),c) instead of trying to perform a shifted uaddsat.
I initially tried to just use shifted promotion in cases where we didn't have a legal/custom umin - but we don't appear to have any targets that have uaddsat but not umin, so imo we're better off always using the umin and avoid an untested shifted uaddsat code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96767
