15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov
2f448bf509 [X86] Migrate tests to use opaque pointers (NFC)
Test updates were performed using:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only the test updates where the test passed without
further modification (which is almost all of them, as the backend
is largely pointer-type agnostic).
2022-06-22 14:38:25 +02:00
Fangrui Song
a084c0388e [TargetMachine] Don't imply dso_local on function declarations in Reloc::Static model for ELF/wasm
clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule sets dso_local on applicable function declarations,
we don't need to duplicate the work in TargetMachine:shouldAssumeDSOLocal.
(Actually the long-term goal (started by r324535) is to drop TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDSOLocal.)

By not implying dso_local, we will respect dso_local/dso_preemptable specifiers
set by the frontend. This allows the proposed -fno-direct-access-external-data
option to work with -fno-pic and prevent a canonical PLT entry (SHN_UNDEF with non-zero st_value)
when taking the address of a function symbol.

This patch should be NFC in terms of the Clang emitted assembly because the case
we don't set dso_local is a case Clang sets dso_local. However, some tests don't
set dso_local on some function declarations and expose some differences. Most
tests have been fixed to be more robust in the previous commit.
2020-12-05 14:54:37 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim
bbc3e03032 [X86] Remove some unused check-prefixes 2020-11-09 15:04:57 +00:00
Fangrui Song
96b0b9a5e3 [X86] Enable shrink-wrapping for no-frame-pointer non-nounwind functions on platforms not using compact unwind
The current compact unwind scheme does not work when the prologue is not at the
start (the instructions before the prologue cannot be described).  (Technically
this is fixable, but it requires multiple compact unwind descriptors for one
function.)

rL255175 chose to not perform shrink-wrapping for no-frame-pointer functions not
marked as nounwind to work around PR25614. This is overly limited, as platforms
not supporting compact unwind (all non-Darwin) does not need the workaround.
This patch restricts the limitation to compact unwind platforms.

Reviewed By: qcolombet

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89930
2020-11-04 16:51:48 -08:00
Dávid Bolvanský
0f14b2e6cb Revert "[BPI] Improve static heuristics for integer comparisons"
This reverts commit 50c743fa713002fe4e0c76d23043e6c1f9e9fe6f. Patch will be split to smaller ones.
2020-08-17 20:44:33 +02:00
Dávid Bolvanský
50c743fa71 [BPI] Improve static heuristics for integer comparisons
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.

GCC also uses this heuristic.

Reviewed By: ebrevnov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
2020-08-13 19:54:27 +02:00
Dávid Bolvanský
f9264995a6 Revert "[BPI] Improve static heuristics for integer comparisons"
This reverts commit 44587e2f7e732604cd6340061d40ac21e7e188e5. Sanitizer tests need to be updated.
2020-08-13 14:37:40 +02:00
Dávid Bolvanský
44587e2f7e [BPI] Improve static heuristics for integer comparisons
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.

GCC also uses this heuristic.

Reviewed By: ebrevnov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
2020-08-13 14:23:58 +02:00
Dávid Bolvanský
a0485421d2 Revert "[BPI] Improve static heuristics for integer comparisons"
This reverts commit 385c9d673f217e176b18e7bf6fe055154ac589c6.
2020-08-13 12:59:15 +02:00
Dávid Bolvanský
385c9d673f [BPI] Improve static heuristics for integer comparisons
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.

GCC also uses this heuristic.

Reviewed By: ebrevnov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
2020-08-13 12:45:40 +02:00
Craig Topper
d72cb4ce21 Recommit "[X86] Separate imm from relocImm handling."
Fix the copy/paste mistake that caused it to fail previously
2020-06-15 10:59:43 -07:00
Hans Wennborg
f47a776628 Revert "[X86] Separate imm from relocImm handling."
> relocImm was a complexPattern that handled both ConstantSDNode
> and X86Wrapper. But it was only applied selectively because using
> it would cause patterns to be not importable into FastISel or
> GlobalISel. So it only got applied to flag setting instructions,
> stores, RMW arithmetic instructions, and rotates.
>
> Most of the test changes are a result of making patterns available
> to GlobalISel or FastISel. The absolute-cmp.ll change is due to
> this fixing a pattern ordering issue to make an absolute symbol
> match to an 8-bit immediate before trying a 32-bit immediate.
>
> I tried to use PatFrags to reduce the repetition, but I was getting
> errors from TableGen.

This caused "Invalid EmitNode" assertions, see the llvm-commits thread for
discussion.
2020-06-15 16:14:59 +02:00
Craig Topper
8885a7640b [X86] Separate imm from relocImm handling.
relocImm was a complexPattern that handled both ConstantSDNode
and X86Wrapper. But it was only applied selectively because using
it would cause patterns to be not importable into FastISel or
GlobalISel. So it only got applied to flag setting instructions,
stores, RMW arithmetic instructions, and rotates.

Most of the test changes are a result of making patterns available
to GlobalISel or FastISel. The absolute-cmp.ll change is due to
this fixing a pattern ordering issue to make an absolute symbol
match to an 8-bit immediate before trying a 32-bit immediate.

I tried to use PatFrags to reduce the repetition, but I was getting
errors from TableGen.
2020-06-13 11:29:28 -07:00
Craig Topper
bc2b70982b [X86] Autogenerate complete checks and add encoding information. NFC
I think we're using an inefficient CMP encoding for absolute
symbols that would fit in an 8-bit value. This is a pattern
priority issue in isel.
2020-06-08 22:27:20 -07:00
Peter Collingbourne
ef089bdb4b X86: Introduce relocImm-based patterns for cmp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28690

llvm-svn: 294636
2017-02-09 22:02:28 +00:00