Over the past day or so, i've took a large swing at our tests,
and reduced the number of tests that were still using the old syntax
from ~1800 to just 200.
Left to handle: (as it is seen in this patch)
* Transforms/LSR
* Transforms/CGP
* Transforms/TypePromotion
* Transforms/HardwareLoops
* Analysis/*
* some misc.
I think this is the right point to start actively refusing
to honor the old syntax, except for the old tests,
to prevent the old syntax from creeping back in.
Thus, let's add temporary default-off flag,
and if it is not passed refuse to accept old syntax.
The tests that still need porting are annotated with this flag.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139647
This prepares for an upcoming change to make --print-imm-hex the default
behavior of llvm-objdump. These tests were updated in a semi-automatic
fashion.
See D136972 for details.
Because of LLVM mangling escape sequence (through '\01' prefix), it is possible
for a single symbols two have two different IR representations.
For instance, consider @symbol and @"\01_symbol". On OSX, because of the system
mangling rules, these two IR names point are converted in the same final symbol
upon linkage.
LTO doesn't model this behavior, which may result in symbols being incorrectly
internalized (if all reference use the escaping sequence while the definition
doesn't).
The proper approach is probably to use the mangled name to compute GUID to
avoid the dual representation, but we can also avoid discarding symbols that are
bound to two different IR names. This is an approximation, but it's less
intrusive on the codebase.
Fix#57864
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135710
Turning on opaque pointers has uncovered an issue with WPD where we currently pattern match away `assume(type.test)` in WPD so that a later LTT doesn't resolve the type test to undef and introduce an `assume(false)`. The pattern matching can fail in cases where we transform two `assume(type.test)`s into `assume(phi(type.test.1, type.test.2))`.
Currently we create `assume(type.test)` for all virtual calls that might be devirtualized. This is to support `-Wl,--lto-whole-program-visibility`.
To prevent this, all virtual calls that may not be in the same LTO module instead use a new `llvm.public.type.test` intrinsic in place of the `llvm.type.test`. Then when we know if `-Wl,--lto-whole-program-visibility` is passed or not, we can either replace all `llvm.public.type.test` with `llvm.type.test`, or replace all `llvm.public.type.test` with `true`. This prevents WPD from trying to pattern match away `assume(type.test)` for public virtual calls when failing the pattern matching will result in miscompiles.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128955
LTO code may end up mixing bitcode files from various sources varying in
their use of opaque pointer types. The current strategy to decide
between opaque / typed pointers upon the first bitcode file loaded does
not work here, since we could be loading a non-opaque bitcode file first
and would then be unable to load any files with opaque pointer types
later.
So for LTO this:
- Adds an `lto::Config::OpaquePointer` option and enforces an upfront
decision between the two modes.
- Adds `-opaque-pointers`/`-no-opaque-pointers` options to the gold
plugin; disabled by default.
- `--opaque-pointers`/`--no-opaque-pointers` options with
`-plugin-opt=-opaque-pointers`/`-plugin-opt=-no-opaque-pointers`
aliases to lld; disabled by default.
- Adds an `-lto-opaque-pointers` option to the `llvm-lto2` tool.
- Changes the clang driver to pass `-plugin-opt=-opaque-pointers` to
the linker in LTO modes when clang was configured with opaque
pointers enabled by default.
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55377
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125847
This removes support for the legacy pass manager in llvm-lto and
llvm-lto2. In this case I've dropped the use-new-pm option entirely,
as I don't think this is considered part of the public interface.
This also makes -debug-pass-manager work with llvm-lto, because
that was needed to migrate some tests to NewPM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123376
These tests are located in 'X86' subfolders which means that they should
be compiled for that target. As they did not have the target specified
explicitly, they in fact were compiled for a default target triple. Not
all targets support all required features for these tests; for example,
if NVPTX is used as a default triple, the tests fail. The patch makes the
tests run for 'x86_64', thus they pass regardless of the default target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121998
The modified tests fail because 64-bit XCOFF object files are not currently supported on AIX. This patch disables these tests on 64-bit AIX for now.
This patch is similar to D111887 except the failures on this patch are on a 64-bit build.
Reviewed By: shchenz, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113049
Many codegen pass require this pass with useful triple info. Legacy pass manager need to
add a TargetLibraryInfo with the module info before run passes. Or the TargetLibraryInfo
will be initialized too conservative.
Reviewed By: pengfei, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115850
The `default_triple` requirement is redundant if the test specifies the triple, so this patch removes it.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115048
On AIX, this test generates an XCOFF file and hits "unknown binary format" assertion in llvm-nm. This patch specifies the triple to mitigate this issue.
Reviewed By: steven_wu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114683
A constant complaint we get is that the __typeid__ symbols in the CFI
jump tables causes confusing stack traces in applications. Emit the more
readable cfi_jt aliases regardless of function export (LTO vs Thin LTO).
Reviewed By: pcc, tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107934
Clang diagnostics refer to identifier names in quotes.
This patch makes inline remarks conform to the convention.
New behavior:
```
% clang -O2 -Rpass=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -S a.c
a.c:4:25: remark: 'foo' inlined into 'bar' with (cost=-30, threshold=337) at callsite bar:0:25; [-Rpass=inline]
int bar(int a) { return foo(a); }
^
```
Reviewed By: hoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107791
Since d6de1e1a71406c75a4ea4d5a2fe84289f07ea3a1, no attributes is quivalent to
setting attribute to false.
This is a preliminary commit for https://reviews.llvm.org/D99080
This removes the need for the remaining doesNotMeet check and instead
directly checks if there are too many runtime checks for vectorization
in the planner.
A subsequent patch will adjust the logic used to decide whether to
vectorize with runtime to consider their cost more accurately.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98634
This is the alternative approach to D96931.
In LTO, for each module with inlineasm block, prepend directive ".lto_discard <sym>, <sym>*" to the beginning of the inline
asm. ".lto_discard" is both a module inlineasm block marker and (optionally) provides a list of symbols to be discarded.
In MC while emitting for inlineasm, discard symbol binding & symbol
definitions according to ".lto_disard".
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98762
In both ADCE and BDCE (via DemandedBits) we should not remove
instructions that are not guaranteed to return. This issue was
pointed out by fhahn in the recent llvm-dev thread.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96993
This version of the patch includes a fix for the cfi failures.
(undoes the revert commit 7db390cc7738a9ba0ed7d4ca59ab6ea2e69c47e9)
It also undoes reverts of follow-up patches that also needed reverting
originally:
* [LTO] Add option enable NewPM with LTOCodeGenerator.
(undoes revert commit 0a17664b47c153aa26a0d31b4835f26375440ec6)
* [LTOCodeGenerator] Use lto::Config for options (NFC)."
(undoes revert commit b0a8e41cfff717ff067bf63412d6edb0280608cd)
This patch adds an option to enable the new pass manager in
LTOCodeGenerator. It also updates a few tests with legacy PM specific
tests, which started failing after 6a59f0560648 when
LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER=true.
This patch updates LTOCodeGenerator to use the utilities provided by
LTOBackend to run middle-end optimizations and backend code generation.
This is a first step towards unifying the code used by libLTO's C API
and the newer, C++ interface (see PR41541).
The immediate motivation is to allow using the new pass manager when
doing LTO using libLTO's C API, which is used on Darwin, among others.
With the changes, there are no codegen/stats differences when building
MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on Darwin X86 with LTO, compared
to without the patch.
Reviewed By: steven_wu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94487
lto::Config has a field to control whether the build is "freestanding"
(no builtins) or not, but it is not hooked up to the code actually
running the passes.
This patch adds support for the flag to both the code that runs
optimization with the new and old pass managers, by explicitly adding a
TargetLibraryInfo instance. If Freestanding is true, all library functions
are disabled.
Reviewed By: steven_wu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94630
This is the #1 of 2 changes that make remarks hotness threshold option
available in more tools. The changes also allow the threshold to sync with
hotness threshold from profile summary with special value 'auto'.
This change modifies the interface of lto::setupLLVMOptimizationRemarks() to
accept remarks hotness threshold. Update all the tools that use it with remarks
hotness threshold options:
* lld: '--opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto2: '--pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto: '--lto-pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* gold plugin: '-plugin-opt=opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85809
We saw the same assertion failure mentioned here
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42063 in our internal tests.
The failure happens in the same circumstance as D47898 and D66814 where
uniqueing of DICompositeTypes causes `Mapper::mapValue` to be called on
GlobalValues(`G`) from a not-yet-linked module(`M`). The following type-mapping for
`G` may not complete correctly (fail to unique types etc. depending on the
the complexity of the types) because IRLinker::computeTypeMapping is not done for `M`
in this path.
D47898 and D66814 fixed some type-mapping issue after Mapper::mapValue
is called on `G`. However, it seems it did not handle some complex cases. I
think we should delay linking globals like `G` until its owing module is
linked. In this way, we could save unnecessary type mapping and prune
these corner cases. It is also supposed to reduce the total number of structs
ending up in the combined module.
D47898 is reverted (its test is kept) because it regresses the test case here.
D66814 could also be reverted (the `check-all` looks good). But it looks reasonable
anyway, so I thought I should keep it.
Also tested the patch with clang self-host regularLTO/ThinLTO build, things look
good as well.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87001
This will embed bitcode after (Thin)LTO merge, but before optimizations.
In the case the thinlto backend is called from clang, the .llvmcmd
section is also produced. Doing so in the case where the caller is the
linker doesn't yet have a motivation, and would require plumbing through
command line args.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87636
The current behavior of -lto-embed-bitcode is not quite the same as that
of -fembed-bitcode. While both populate .llvmbc with bitcode, the latter
populates it with pre-optimized bitcode(*), while the former with
post-optimized. The scenarios driving them are different - the latter's
goal is to allow re-compilation, while the former, IIUC, is execution.
I plan to add a third mode for thinlto cases, closely-related to
-fembed-bitcode's scenario: adding the bitcode pre-optimization, but
post-merging. This would allow re-compilation without requiring the
other .bc files that were merged (akin to how -fembed-bitcode allows
recompilation without all the .h files)
The third mode can't co-exist with the current -lto-embed-bitcode mode,
because the latter would overwrite it. For clarity, we change
-lto-embed-bitcode to be an enum.
(*) That's the compiler semantics. The driver splits compilation in 2
phases, so if -fembed-bitcode is given to the driver, the .llvmbc is
optimized bitcode; if the option is passed to the compiler (after -cc1),
the section is pre-optimized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87477
There are two ways .llvmbc can be produced:
* clang -c -fembed-bitcode=all (which also produces .llvmcmd)
* LTO backend: ld.lld -mllvm -lto-embed-bitcode or -plugin-opt=-lto-embed-bitcode
.llvmbc and .llvmcmd have the SHF_ALLOC flag, so they can be dropped by
--gc-sections.
This patch sets SectionKind::Metadata to drop the SHF_ALLOC flag. This
is conceptually correct: the two sections are not part of the process
image, so SHF_ALLOC is not appropriate.
`test/LTO/X86/embed-bitcode.ll`: changed `llvm-objcopy -O binary --only-section` to
`llvm-objcopy --dump-section`. `-O binary` does not dump non-SHF_ALLOC sections.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86374
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().
I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882
The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier.
`.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive.
Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section`
line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail.
```
Disassembly of section .foo:
0000000000001634 .foo:
```
Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right"
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
Tools working with object files on Darwin (e.g. lipo) may need to know
properties like the CPU type and subtype of a bitcode file. The logic of
converting a triple to a Mach-O CPU_(SUB_)TYPE should be provided by
LLVM instead of relying on tools to re-implement it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75067
This reverts commit 80a34ae31125aa46dcad47162ba45b152aed968d with fixes.
Previously, since bots turning on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are essentially turning on
MachineVerifierPass by default on X86 and the fact that
inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll and inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
are not expected to generate functioning machine code, this would go
down to `report_fatal_error` in MachineVerifierPass. Here passing
`-verify-machineinstrs=0` to make the intent explicit.
This reverts commit 80a34ae31125aa46dcad47162ba45b152aed968d with fixes.
On bots llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-ubuntu and
llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian only,
llc returns 0 for these two tests unexpectedly. I tweaked the RUN line a little
bit in the hope that LIT is the culprit since this change is not in the
codepath these tests are testing.
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
This reverts commit rGcd5b308b828e, rGcd5b308b828e, rG8cedf0e2994c.
There are issues to be investigated for polly bots and bots turning on
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS.
