This patch introduces a new AA `AAUnderlyingObjects`. It is basically like a wrapper
AA of the function `AA::getAssumedUnderlyingObjects`, but it can recursively do
query if the underlying object is an indirect access, such as a phi node or a select
instruction.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141164
We were already treating branch on poison as UB, but branch on
undef is also UB. Move the checks into the correct function.
From LangRef for br:
> If ‘cond’ is poison or undef, this instruction has undefined behavior.
From LangRef for switch:
> If ‘value’ is poison or undef, this instruction has undefined behavior.
There is a minor regression in dont-distribute-phi.ll, apparently
we handle that pattern in logical but not bitwise form.
AAPotentialConstantValues now works for PHI and Load by simply examinig
AAPotentialValues for the instruction itself.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140371
This reverts commit d57a3443f3e2b423fd7f5402f017dc7c0dff8cdf.
This patch was never part of the memory leak problem that lead to the
revert, just an innocent bystander caught in the middle...
Also, added a second reproducer reported after the revert.
Previously reverted in 8b446ea2ba39e406bcf940ea35d6efb4bb9afe95
Reapplying because this commit is NOT DEPENDENT on the reverted commit
fc21f2d7bae2e0be630470cc7ca9323ed5859892, which broke the ASAN buildbot.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/rGfc21f2d7bae2e0be630470cc7ca9323ed5859892 for
more information.
The arguments to a PHI may represent a recurrence by eventually using the output
of the PHI itself. This is now handled by checking for cycles in the control
flow. If a PHI is not in a recurrence, it is now able to report multiple offsets
instead of conservatively reporting unknown.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138991
Before we might have missed calling the destructor on an abstract
attribute if it was created outside the seeding or update phase.
All AAs are now in the AAMap and we can use it to delete them all.
Previously reverted in 12696d302d146ffe616eecab3feceba9d29be2db
The arguments to a PHI may represent a recurrence by eventually using the output
of the PHI itself. This is now handled by checking for cycles in the control
flow. If a PHI is not in a recurrence, it is now able to report multiple offsets
instead of conservatively reporting unknown.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138991
The arguments to a PHI may represent a recurrence by eventually using the output
of the PHI itself. This is now handled by checking for cycles in the control
flow. If a PHI is not in a recurrence, it is now able to report multiple offsets
instead of conservatively reporting unknown.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138991
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D136745 we introduced the "pre-condition"
that offsets should not be -1 or -2. This can easily break. The new
special values are INT32_MAX and INT32_MIN, which we might want to
replace with std::optional or flags instead.
Even if all loads and stores are in `nosync` functions we cannot
guarantee there is no synchronization going on between them. As such, we
cannot use CFG reasoning. We could check the entire module, or, what
happens now to minimize test churn, is to check if all accesses are in
the same function that is `nosync`. A follow up will undo some of the
regressions where possible.
Similarly, reachability cannot be used to exclude an access if the
access is not known to be executed by the same thread as the given
instruction.
The OpenMP-opt test was added for the latter problem.
We had two AAs for reachability but it was very cumbersome to extend
them. We also had some fallback to use LLVM-core mechanisms and cache
the result. The new design shares the query code and interface nicely
between AAIntraFnReachability and AAInterFnReachability.
As part of the rewrite we also added the ExclusionSet to the queries.
Even if a value is for sure written we need to visit the call sites as
they might end up inside the function that reads and writes the value.
In a follow up we can introduce correct reasoning to avoid the backwards
traversal in this case and instead check if any call site between the
write and the read might reach a potential write we want to exclude.
An expression of the form `gep(base, select(pred, const1, const2))` can result
in a set of offsets instead of just one. PointerInfo can now track these sets
instead of conservatively modeling them as Unknown. In general, AAPointerInfo
now uses AAPotentialConstantValues to examine the operands of the GEP.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138646
An expression of the form `gep(base, select(pred, const1, const2))` can result
in a set of offsets instead of just one. PointerInfo can now track these sets
instead of conservatively modeling them as Unknown. In general, AAPointerInfo
now uses AAPotentialConstantValues to examine the operands of the GEP.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138646
Similar to dominance reasoning, we cannot use CFG reachability if the
instructions might be executed by different threads. A follow up will
improve our sensitivity for situations when it is OK to use graph
reasoning.
If a select or PHI instruction cannot be simplified to a single value it
is often beneficial to keep the value intact rather than looking at all
the operands. The reason is that various users require a single value
and consequently can deal with the select or PHI but not multiple
operands. Recursive calls of `Attributor::getAssumedSimplifiedValues`
will be required to take such select and PHI instructions apart.
We keep loads if they feed into assumes but even if we cannot predict
their value we should delete them if the associated stores are deleted
as well. This is not perfect but prioritizes deleting stores now.
Assumptions can help us reason about memory content. This patch teaches
AAPointerInfo to reason about memory assumptions of the following form:
```
%x = load %ptr
... code not writing memory, may include branches ...
%c = %x == %val
... code not writing memory, may include branches ...
llvm.assume(%c)
```
Assumption accesses are recognized from the involved load (%x above).
Assumption accesses are treated special and neither as ordinary read or
write. We use read encoding with an extra flag. Reads are not impacting
other reads or writes. Writes could do that. We don't want assumptions
to impact other writes as they themselves only confirm a value, not
write it. So the "other" write might be required as the assumption only
confirms the effect of that write.
This restores commit b756096b0cbef0918394851644649b3c28a886e2, which was
originally reverted in 00b09a7b18abb253d36b3d3e1c546007288f6e89.
AAPointerInfo now maintains a list of all Access objects that it owns, along
with the following maps:
- OffsetBins: OffsetAndSize -> { Access }
- InstTupleMap: RemoteI x LocalI -> Access
A RemoteI is any instruction that accesses memory. RemoteI is different from
LocalI if and only if LocalI is a call; then RemoteI is some instruction in the
callgraph starting from LocalI.
Motivation: When AAPointerInfo recomputes the offset for an instruction, it sets
the value to Unknown if the new offset is not the same as the old offset. The
instruction must now be moved from its current bin to the bin corresponding to
the new offset. This happens for example, when:
- A PHINode has operands that result in different offsets.
- The same remote inst is reachable from the same local inst via different paths
in the callgraph:
```
A (local inst)
|
B
/ \
C1 C2
\ /
D (remote inst)
```
This fixes a bug where a store is incorrectly eliminated in a lit test.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, ye-luo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136526
This switches everything to use the memory attribute proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-unify-memory-effect-attributes/65579.
The old argmemonly, inaccessiblememonly and inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly
attributes are dropped. The readnone, readonly and writeonly attributes
are restricted to parameters only.
The old attributes are auto-upgraded both in bitcode and IR.
The bitcode upgrade is a policy requirement that has to be retained
indefinitely. The IR upgrade is mainly there so it's not necessary
to update all tests using memory attributes in this patch, which
is already large enough. We could drop that part after migrating
tests, or retain it longer term, to make it easier to import IR
from older LLVM versions.
High-level Function/CallBase APIs like doesNotAccessMemory() or
setDoesNotAccessMemory() are mapped transparently to the memory
attribute. Code that directly manipulates attributes (e.g. via
AttributeList) on the other hand needs to switch to working with
the memory attribute instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135780
AAPointerInfo now maintains a list of all Access objects that it owns, along
with the following maps:
- OffsetBins: OffsetAndSize -> { Access }
- InstTupleMap: RemoteI x LocalI -> Access
A RemoteI is any instruction that accesses memory. RemoteI is different from
LocalI if and only if LocalI is a call; then RemoteI is some instruction in the
callgraph starting from LocalI.
Motivation: When AAPointerInfo recomputes the offset for an instruction, it sets
the value to Unknown if the new offset is not the same as the old offset. The
instruction must now be moved from its current bin to the bin corresponding to
the new offset. This happens for example, when:
- A PHINode has operands that result in different offsets.
- The same remote inst is reachable from the same local inst via different paths
in the callgraph:
```
A (local inst)
|
B
/ \
C1 C2
\ /
D (remote inst)
```
This fixes a bug where a store is incorrectly eliminated in a lit test.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136526
When translating offset info from the callee at a call site, first check if the
offset is Unknown. Any offset in the caller should be added only if the callee
offset is valid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137011
When determining the initial value of the object, use the constant
folding API to load a given type at a given offset in the global
initializer. This makes it work for cases where the load doesn't
directly correspond to an aggregate member.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135435
If a call base use will not capture a pointer we can approximate the
effects. This is important especially for readnone/only uses. Even
may-write uses are not too bad with reachability in place. Capturing
is the problem as we loose track of update sides.
If we have a constant aggregate, e.g., as an initializer, we usually
failed to extract the proper value/type from it. This patch provides the
size and offset information necessary to extract the right part of the
constant.
A User like the PHINode may be visited multiple times for the same pointer along
different def-use edges. The uninitialized state of OffsetInfo at the first
visit needs to be distinct from the Unknown value that may be assigned after
processing the PHINode. Without that, a PHINode with all inputs Unknown is never
followed to its uses. This results in incorrect optimization because some
interfering accessess are missed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134704
Now that the legacy PM is no longer tested, the huge matrix of
test prefixes used by attributor tests is no longer needed and very
confusing for the casual reader. Reduce the prefixes down to just
CHECK, TUNIT and CGSCC.
This is the first patch in a series intended for removing flag
-enable-new-pm=0 from lit tests. This is part of a bigger
effort of completely removing legacy code related to legacy
pass manager in favor of currently default new pass manager.
In this patch flag has been removed only from tests where no significant
change has been required because checks has been duplicated for
both PMs.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134150
