This is part of improving floating-point patterns seen in:
https://llvm.org/PR39480
We don't require any FMF because the 2 potential corner cases
(-0.0 and NaN) are correctly handled without FMF:
1. -0.0 is treated as strictly less than +0.0 with
maximum/minimum, so fabs/fneg work as expected.
2. +/- 0.0 with maxnum/minnum is indeterminate, so
transforming to fabs/fneg is more defined.
3. The sign of a NaN may be altered by this transform,
but that is allowed in the default FP environment.
If there are FMF, they are propagated from the min/max call to
one or both new operands which seems to agree with Alive2:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/bem_xC
As discussed in PR45478:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45478
...propagating FMF from the outer (second) call is not correct,
so intersect them instead.
I suspect we could do better (see TODO comment), but mismatched
FMF is probably too rare to care about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78631
Summary: Rewrite the fsub-0.0 idiom to fneg and always emit fneg for fp
negation. This also extends the scalarization cost in instcombine for unary
operators to result in the same IR rewrites for fneg as for the idiom.
Reviewed By: cameron.mcinally
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75467
Use UnaryOperator::CreateFNeg instead.
Summary:
With the introduction of the native fneg instruction, the
fsub -0.0, %x idiom is obsolete. This patch makes LLVM
emit fneg instead of the idiom in all places.
Reviewed By: cameron.mcinally
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75130
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
