If we don't demand low bits and it is valid to pre-shift a constant:
(C2 >> X) << C1 --> (C2 << C1) >> X
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_UzTMP
This is the reverse-order shift sibling to 82040d414b3c ( D127122 ).
It seems likely that we would want to add this to the SDAG version of
the code too to keep it on par with IR.
If we don't demand high bits (zeros) and it is valid to pre-shift a constant:
(C2 << X) >> C1 --> (C2 >> C1) << X
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/P3dWDW
There are a variety of related patterns, but I haven't found a single solution
that gets all of the motivating examples - so pulling this piece out of
D126617 along with more tests.
We should also handle the case where we shift-right followed by shift-left,
but I'll make that a follow-on patch assuming this one is ok. It seems likely
that we would want to add this to the SDAG version of the code too to keep it
on par with IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127122
(C2 >> X) >> C1 --> (C2 >> C1) >> X
The shift-left form of this transform has existed since:
16f18ed7b555bce5163
...but it applies to matching shift right opcodes too:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/c5eQms
The restriction goes back to:
16f18ed7b555bce51
...but the fold only replaces a shift with a shift, so that's not necessary.
Generalizing to other opcodes is planned as a follow-up.
This is no-externally-visible-functional-difference-intended.
That is, the test diffs show identical instructions other than
name changes (those are included specifically to verify the logic).
The existing transforms created extra instructions and relied
on subsequent folds to get to the final result, but that could
conflict with other transforms like the proposed D110170 (and
caused that patch to be reverted twice so far because of infinite
combine loops).
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This is the straightforward fix for PR26760:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26760
But we still need to make some changes to generalize this helper function
and then send the lshr case into here.
llvm-svn: 265960
