36 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bjorn Pettersson
b280ee1dd7 [test] Use -passes=instsimplify instead of -instsimplify in a number of tests. NFC
Another step moving away from the deprecated syntax of specifying
pass pipeline in opt.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119080
2022-02-07 14:26:58 +01:00
Sanjay Patel
6bd127b079 [InstSimplify] use knownbits to fold more udiv/urem
We could use knownbits on both operands for even more folds (and there are
already tests in place for that), but this is enough to recover the example
from:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51934
(the tests are derived from the code in that example)

I am assuming no noticeable compile-time impact from this because udiv/urem
are rare opcodes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116616
2022-01-12 14:59:43 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
4a8c0aa094 [InstSimplify] add tests for udiv/urem with known bits; NFC 2022-01-05 08:33:04 -05:00
David Goldblatt
8607a02357 [InstSimplify] Transform X * Y % Y --> 0
simplifyDiv already handles the case X * Y / Y --> X (barring overflow).
This adds the equivalent handling to simplifyRem.

Correctness:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/J2cUbS
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/us9NUM
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/AvaDGJ
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/kq9ige

Extending the situations in which we apply this transform would not be
correct:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Lf9V63
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/6RPQK3
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/p9UdxC
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/A2zlhE
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/vHTtLw
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/lvpH42

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102864
2021-05-25 10:16:04 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
cb3bc9d81d [InstSimplify] add more tests for rem-mul-div; NFC
See D102864 for discussion.
2021-05-23 09:46:29 -04:00
David Goldblatt
3c4b79481d [InstSimplify] add tests for rem-of-mul; NFC
These are baseline tests for D102864
2021-05-21 15:46:39 -04:00
Juneyoung Lee
395607af3c Reapply [ConstantFold] Fold more operations to poison
This was reverted to mitigate mitigate miscompiles caused by
the logical and/or to bitwise and/or fold. Reapply it now that
the underlying issue has been fixed by D101191.

-----

This patch folds more operations to poison.

Alive2 proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mxcb9G (it does not contain tests about div/rem because they fold to poison when raising UB)

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92270
2021-05-13 16:04:12 +02:00
Juneyoung Lee
06829034ca Revert "[ConstantFold] Fold more operations to poison"
This reverts commit 53040a968dc2ff20931661e55f05da2ef8b964a0 due to its
bad interaction with select i1 -> and/or i1 transformation.

This fixes:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49005
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48435
2021-02-04 00:24:02 +09:00
Nikita Popov
766cf7f32e [InstSimplify] Fold division by zero to poison
Div/rem by zero is immediate undefined behavior and anything goes.
Currently we fold it to undef, this patch changes it to fold to
poison instead, which is slightly stronger.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93995
2021-01-03 20:52:45 +01:00
Juneyoung Lee
864dda5fd5 [InstSimplify] Add tests that fold instructions with poison operands (NFC) 2020-12-02 01:01:59 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
53040a968d [ConstantFold] Fold more operations to poison
This patch folds more operations to poison.

Alive2 proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mxcb9G (it does not contain tests about div/rem because they fold to poison when raising UB)

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92270
2020-11-29 21:19:48 +09:00
Eric Christopher
cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
2b7e31095d [InstSimplify] fold srem with sext bool divisor
llvm-svn: 335616
2018-06-26 15:32:54 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
0e0dbebeed [InstSimplify] add tests for srem with sext bool divisor; NFC
llvm-svn: 335609
2018-06-26 14:47:31 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
1e911fa746 [InstSimplify] fold div/rem of zexted bool
I was looking at an unrelated fold and noticed that
we don't have this simplification (because the other
fold would break existing tests).

Name: zext udiv
  %z = zext i1 %x to i32
  %r = udiv i32 %y, %z
=>
  %r = %y

Name: zext urem
  %z = zext i1 %x to i32
  %r = urem i32 %y, %z
=>
  %r = 0

Name: zext sdiv
  %z = zext i1 %x to i32
  %r = sdiv i32 %y, %z
=>
  %r = %y

Name: zext srem
  %z = zext i1 %x to i32
  %r = srem i32 %y, %z
=>
  %r = 0

https://rise4fun.com/Alive/LZ9

llvm-svn: 335512
2018-06-25 18:51:21 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
a46bcbec58 [InstSimplify] add tests for div/rem with bool divisor; NFC
llvm-svn: 335509
2018-06-25 18:27:14 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
30be665e82 [PatternMatch] allow undef elements when matching a vector zero
This is the last step in getting constant pattern matchers to allow
undef elements in constant vectors.

I'm adding a dedicated m_ZeroInt() function and building m_Zero() from
that. In most cases, calling code can be updated to use m_ZeroInt()
directly when there's no need to match pointers, but I'm leaving that
efficiency optimization as a follow-up step because it's not always
clear when that's ok.

There are just enough icmp folds in InstSimplify that can be used for 
integer or pointer types, that we probably still want a generic m_Zero()
for those cases. Otherwise, we could eliminate it (and possibly add a
m_NullPtr() as an alias for isa<ConstantPointerNull>()).

We're conservatively returning a full zero vector (zeroinitializer) in
InstSimplify/InstCombine on some of these folds (see diffs in InstSimplify),
but I'm not sure if that's actually necessary in all cases. We may be 
able to propagate an undef lane instead. One test where this happens is 
marked with 'TODO'.
 

llvm-svn: 330550
2018-04-22 17:07:44 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
d0b27a1156 [InstSimplify] move/add/regenerate checks for tests; NFC
llvm-svn: 330515
2018-04-21 16:23:47 +00:00
Zvi Rackover
51f0d64b9c InstSimplify: If divisor element is undef simplify to undef
Summary:
If any vector divisor element is undef, we can arbitrarily choose it be
zero which would make the div/rem an undef value by definition.

Reviewers: spatel, reames

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: magabari, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42485

llvm-svn: 323343
2018-01-24 17:22:00 +00:00
Anton Bikineev
82f61151b3 [InstSimplify] (X << Y) % X -> 0
llvm-svn: 323182
2018-01-23 09:27:47 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
7a44e4d594 [InstSimplify] add baseline tests for (X << Y) % X -> 0; NFC
This is the 'rem' counterpart to D42032 and would be folded by
D42341.

Patch by Anton Bikineev.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42342

llvm-svn: 323067
2018-01-21 15:36:15 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
bb1b1c97fa [InstSimplify] fix some test names; NFC
Too much division...the quotient is the answer.

llvm-svn: 312943
2017-09-11 20:38:31 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
5876189ff1 [InstSimplify] refactor udiv/urem code and add tests; NFCI
This removes some duplicated code and makes it easier to support signed div/rem
in a similar way if we want to do that. Note that the existing comments were not
accurate - we don't need a constant divisor to simplify; icmp simplification does
more than that. But as the added tests show, it could go even further.

llvm-svn: 312885
2017-09-10 17:55:08 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
962a8431ea [InstSimplify] allow folds for bool vector div/rem
llvm-svn: 297411
2017-03-09 21:56:03 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
7e56366204 [ConstantFold] vector div/rem with any zero element in divisor is undef
Follow-up for:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30665
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL297390

llvm-svn: 297409
2017-03-09 20:42:30 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
bb47616aef [InstSimplify] add tests for vector constant folding div/rem-by-0; NFC
llvm-svn: 297407
2017-03-09 20:31:20 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
2b1f6f4b92 [InstSimplify] vector div/rem with any zero element in divisor is undef
This was suggested as a DAG simplification in the review for rL297026 :
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20170306/435253.html
...but let's start with IR since we have actual docs for IR (LangRef).

Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30665

llvm-svn: 297390
2017-03-09 16:20:52 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
3bbee79d9e [InstSimplify] add tests for vector div/rem with UB potential; NFC
llvm-svn: 297048
2017-03-06 18:45:39 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
c494239bd8 [InstSimplify] regenerate checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 297040
2017-03-06 18:13:01 +00:00
David Majnemer
8c0e62f507 [InstSimplify] Optimize away urems in the presence of range metadata
We know that urem %V, C can be optimized away to %V if %V is ult C.

llvm-svn: 291282
2017-01-06 21:23:51 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
69632447b1 [InstSimplify] regenerate checks using a script
I didn't notice any significant changes in the actual checks here;
all of these tests already used FileCheck, so a script can batch
update them in one shot.

This commit is just to show the value of automating this process: 
We have uniform formatting as opposed to a mish-mash of check
structure that changes based on individual prefs and the current
fashion. This makes it simpler to update when we find a bug or
make an enhancement.

llvm-svn: 264457
2016-03-25 20:12:25 +00:00
David Majnemer
b435a4214e InstSimplify: Don't allow (x srem y) urem y -> x srem y
Let's consider the case where:
%x i16 = 32768
%y i16 = 384

%x srem %y = 65408
(%x srem %y) urem %y = 128

llvm-svn: 217939
2014-09-17 04:16:35 +00:00
David Majnemer
ac717f0972 InstSimplify: ((X % Y) % Y) -> (X % Y)
Patch by Sonam Kumari!

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5350

llvm-svn: 217937
2014-09-17 03:34:34 +00:00
Stephen Lin
c1c7a1309c Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.
This update was done with the following bash script:

  find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
  while read NAME; do
    echo "$NAME"
    if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
      TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
      cp $NAME $TEMP
      sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
      while read FUNC; do
        sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
      done
      mv $TEMP $NAME
    fi
  done

llvm-svn: 186268
2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
Duncan Sands
a3e3699c88 Move some rem transforms out of instcombine and into instsimplify.
This automagically provides a transform noticed by my super-optimizer
as occurring quite often: "rem x, (select cond, x, 1)" -> 0.

llvm-svn: 130694
2011-05-02 16:27:02 +00:00