While "skip measurements mode" is super useful for test coverage,
i've come to discover it's trade-offs. It still calls back-end
to actually codegen the target assembly, and that is what is taking
80%+ of the time regardless of whether or not we skip the measurements.
On the other hand, just being able to see that exegesis can come up
with a snippet to measure something, is already very useful,
and takes maybe a second for a all-opcode sweep.
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140702
Sometimes we only want to ensure that we can produce snippets (all the way
through `SnippetRepetitor`!), but don't care for the execution.
E.g. all of our tests are this way.
I've built LLVM without PFM and removed my CPU from `X86PfmCounters.td`,
and this produces the expected results in that configuration.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139448
LBR contains (up to) 16 entries for last x branches and the X86LBRCounter (from D77422) should be able to return all those.
Currently, it just returns the latest entry, which could lead to mis-leading measurements.
This patch aslo changes the LatencyBenchmarkRunner to accommodate multi-value readings.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D81050
The addition of `inverse_throughput` mode highlighted the disjointedness
of snippet generators and benchmark runners because it used the
`UopsSnippetGenerator` with the `LatencyBenchmarkRunner`.
To keep the code consistent tie the snippet generators to
parallelization/serialization rather than their benchmark runners.
Renaming `LatencySnippetGenerator` -> `SerialSnippetGenerator`.
Renaming `UopsSnippetGenerator` -> `ParallelSnippetGenerator`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72928
