The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
Now that C++17 is enabled in LLVM, a lot of the TODOs and patterns to emulate C++17 features can be eliminated.
The steps I have taken were essentially:
```
git grep C++17
git grep c++17
git grep "initializer_list<int>"
```
and address given comments and patterns.
Most of the changes boiled down to just using fold expressions rather than initializer_list.
While doing this I also discovered that Clang by default restricts the depth of fold expressions to 256 elements. I specifically hit this with `TestDialect` in `addOperations`. I opted to not replace it with fold expressions because of that but instead adding a comment documenting the issue.
If any other functions may be called with more than 256 elements in the future we might have to revert other parts as well.
I don't think this is a common occurence besides the `TestDialect` however. If need be, this could potentially be fixed via `mlir-tblgen` in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131323
Scope ops file to ops. Used canonicalization as grouping for canonicalization
patterns and folders (also considered OpTransforms but that felt too generic
and the former two are used together).
Reviewed By: silvas, rsuderman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130297
Transpose operations on constant data were getting folded during the
canonicalization process. This has compile time cost proportional to
the constant size. Moving this to a separate pass to enable optionality
and flexibility of how such scenarios can be handled.
Reviewed By: rsuderman, jpienaar, stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124685
