13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
James Y Knight
c7f3437507
NFC: Clean up of IntrusiveRefCntPtr construction from raw pointers. (#151545)
Handles clang::DiagnosticsEngine and clang::DiagnosticIDs.

For DiagnosticIDs, this mostly migrates from `new DiagnosticIDs` to
convenience method `DiagnosticIDs::create()`.

Part of cleanup https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/151026
2025-07-31 15:07:35 -04:00
Jan Svoboda
13e1a2cb22 Reapply "[clang] Remove intrusive reference count from DiagnosticOptions (#139584)"
This reverts commit e2a885537f11f8d9ced1c80c2c90069ab5adeb1d. Build failures were fixed right away and reverting the original commit without the fixes breaks the build again.
2025-05-22 12:52:03 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
e2a885537f Revert "[clang] Remove intrusive reference count from DiagnosticOptions (#139584)"
This reverts commit 9e306ad4600c4d3392c194a8be88919ee758425c.

Multiple builtbot failures have been reported:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584
2025-05-22 12:44:20 -07:00
Jan Svoboda
9e306ad460
[clang] Remove intrusive reference count from DiagnosticOptions (#139584)
The `DiagnosticOptions` class is currently intrusively
reference-counted, which makes reasoning about its lifetime very
difficult in some cases. For example, `CompilerInvocation` owns the
`DiagnosticOptions` instance (wrapped in `llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr`) and
only exposes an accessor returning `DiagnosticOptions &`. One would
think this gives `CompilerInvocation` exclusive ownership of the object,
but that's not the case:

```c++
void shareOwnership(CompilerInvocation &CI) {
  llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<DiagnosticOptions> CoOwner = &CI.getDiagnosticOptions();
  // ...
}
```

This is a perfectly valid pattern that is being actually used in the
codebase.

I would like to ensure the ownership of `DiagnosticOptions` by
`CompilerInvocation` is guaranteed to be exclusive. This can be
leveraged for a copy-on-write optimization later on. This PR changes
usages of `DiagnosticOptions` across `clang`, `clang-tools-extra` and
`lldb` to not be intrusively reference-counted.
2025-05-22 12:33:52 -07:00
Jan Svoboda
b69dcb8734
[clang][frontend] Require invocation to construct CompilerInstance (#137668)
This PR makes it so that `CompilerInvocation` needs to be provided to
`CompilerInstance` on construction. There are a couple of benefits in my
view:
* Making it impossible to mis-use some `CompilerInstance` APIs. For
example there are cases, where `createDiagnostics()` was called before
`setInvocation()`, causing the `DiagnosticEngine` to use the
default-constructed `DiagnosticOptions` instead of the intended ones.
* This shrinks `CompilerInstance`'s state space.
* This makes it possible to access **the** invocation in
`CompilerInstance`'s constructor (to be used in a follow-up).
2025-05-01 07:31:30 -07:00
Kadir Cetinkaya
df9a14d7bb
Reapply "[NFC] Explicitly pass a VFS when creating DiagnosticsEngine (#115852)"
This reverts commit a1153cd6fedd4c906a9840987934ca4712e34cb2 with fixes
to lldb breakages.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/117145.
2024-11-21 14:55:30 +01:00
Sylvestre Ledru
a1153cd6fe Revert "[NFC] Explicitly pass a VFS when creating DiagnosticsEngine (#115852)"
Reverted for causing:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/117145

This reverts commit bdd10d9d249bd1c2a45e3de56a5accd97e953458.
2024-11-21 13:04:30 +01:00
kadir çetinkaya
bdd10d9d24
[NFC] Explicitly pass a VFS when creating DiagnosticsEngine (#115852)
Starting with 41e3919ded78d8870f7c95e9181c7f7e29aa3cc4 DiagnosticsEngine
creation might perform IO. It was implicitly defaulting to
getRealFileSystem. This patch makes it explicit by pushing the decision
making to callers.

It uses ambient VFS if one is available, and keeps using
`getRealFileSystem` if there aren't any VFS.
2024-11-21 12:11:41 +01:00
Krasimir Georgiev
b2ebd8b897
clang serialization unittests: fix some leaks (#82773)
No functional changes intended.

Fixes some leaks found by running under asan with `--gtest_repeat=2`.
2024-02-26 16:58:39 +01:00
Mikhail Goncharov
4faa6c6699 [clang][test] Use a physical copy of FS
(missing piece from https://reviews.llvm.org/D152265)
476e7c49ecb762df1d68273696b06c36feb0fd96
2023-06-06 17:36:35 +02:00
Kadir Cetinkaya
476e7c49ec
[clang][test] Use a physical copy of FS
Make use of a physical copy, rather than real FS in unittests that
change working-directory to get rid of the side effect of changing cwd for the
whole process. It's triggering crashes depending on the test order.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152265
2023-06-06 15:45:55 +02:00
Sam McCall
499d0b96cb [clang] createInvocationFromCommandLine -> createInvocation, delete former. NFC
(Followup from 40c13720a4b977d4347bbde53c52a4d0703823c2)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125012
2022-05-06 16:21:48 +02:00
Ben Barham
766a08df12 [Frontend] Only compile modules if not already finalized
It was possible to re-add a module to a shared in-memory module cache
when search paths are changed. This can eventually cause a crash if the
original module is referenced after this occurs.
  1. Module A depends on B
  2. B exists in two paths C and D
  3. First run only has C on the search path, finds A and B and loads
     them
  4. Second run adds D to the front of the search path. A is loaded and
     contains a reference to the already compiled module from C. But
     searching finds the module from D instead, causing a mismatch
  5. B and the modules that depend on it are considered out of date and
     thus rebuilt
  6. The recompiled module A is added to the in-memory cache, freeing
     the previously inserted one

This can never occur from a regular clang process, but is very easy to
do through the API - whether through the use of a shared case or just
running multiple compilations from a single `CompilerInstance`. Update
the compilation to return early if a module is already finalized so that
the pre-condition in the in-memory module cache holds.

Resolves rdar://78180255

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105328
2021-07-15 18:27:08 -07:00