This patch attempts to fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/25708
Current access check missed qualifier(`NestedNameSpecifier`) in friend
class checking. Add it to `Records` of `EffectiveContext` by changing
the `DeclContext` makes `MatchesFriend` work.
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
Fixes#54051
This patch implements the C++20 feature -- CTAD for alias templates (P1814R0, specified in https://eel.is/c++draft/over.match.class.deduct#3). It is an initial patch:
- it cover major pieces, thus it works for most cases;
- the big missing piece is to implement the associated constraints (over.match.class.deduct#3.3) for the synthesized deduction guides, see the FIXME in code and tests;
- Some enhancements on the TreeTransform&TemplateInstantiator to allow performing instantiation on `BuildingDeductionGuides` mode;
source location in` AliasTemplateDeductionGuideTransform`.
I don't have a reproducible testcase, but this should be a safe and
non-functional change. We have checked the `hasDefaultArg` before
calling `getDefaultArg()`, but `hasDefaultArg` allows
unparsed/uninstantiated default arg which is prohibited in
`getDefaultArg()`.
Since we're only interested in the source location, we switch to use
`getDefaultArgRange()` API.
The following snippet causes a crash:
```
template<typename T>
struct A : T {
using T::f;
void f();
void g() {
f<int>(); // crash here
}
};
```
This happens because we cast the result of `getAsTemplateNameDecl` as a
`TemplateDecl` in `Sema::ClassifyName`, which we cannot do for an
`UnresolvedUsingValueDecl`. This patch fixes the crash by considering a name
to be that of a template if _any_ function declaration is found per [temp.names] p3.3.
Reapplies #78274 with the addition of a default-error warning
(`strict-primary-template-shadow`) that is issued for instances of
shadowing which were previously accepted prior to this patch.
I couldn't find an established convention for naming diagnostics related
to compatibility with previous versions of clang, so I just used the
prefix `ext_compat_`.
The first sentence says:
If a template-parameter of a class template, variable template, or alias
template has a default template-argument, each subsequent
template-parameter shall either have a default template-argument
supplied or be a template parameter pack.
However, we were only testing for "not a function function template",
and referring to an older version of the standard. As far as I can tell,
CWG2032 added the variable-template, and the alias-template pre-dates
the standard on github.
This patch started as a bug fix for #83461 , but ended up fixing a
number of similar cases, so those are validated as well.
Consider the following:
```
struct A {
static constexpr bool x = true;
};
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U) noexcept(T::y); // #1, error: no member named 'y' in 'A'
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::x); // #2
template<>
void f(A, int*) noexcept; // explicit specialization of #2
```
We currently instantiate the exception specification of all candidate
function template specializations when deducting template arguments for
an explicit specialization, which results in a error despite `#1` not
being selected by partial ordering as the most specialized template.
According to [except.spec] p13:
> An exception specification is considered to be needed when:
> - [...]
> - the exception specification is compared to that of another
declaration (e.g., an explicit specialization or an overriding virtual
function);
Assuming that "comparing declarations" means "determining whether the
declarations correspond and declare the same entity" (per [basic.scope.scope] p4 and
[basic.link] p11.1, respectively), the exception specification does _not_ need to be
instantiated until _after_ partial ordering, at which point we determine
whether the implicitly instantiated specialization and the explicit
specialization declare the same entity (the determination of whether two
functions/function templates correspond does not consider the exception
specifications).
This patch defers the instantiation of the exception specification until
a single function template specialization is selected via partial
ordering, matching the behavior of GCC, EDG, and
MSVC: see https://godbolt.org/z/Ebb6GTcWE.
Update include-cleaner tests. Now that we have proper found-decls set up
for VarTemplates, in case of instationtations we point to primary
templates and not specializations. To be changed in a follow-up patch.
We currently accept the following explicit specialization with a warning
for the extraneous template parameter list:
```
template<typename T>
void f();
template<>
template<>
void f<int>(); // warning: extraneous template parameter list in template specialization
```
This should really be an extension warning so we reject with
`-pedantic-errors`. This patch converts the warning to an extension
warning.
This patch converts `Sema::TemplateDeductionResult` into a scoped enum
in namespace scope, making it eligible for forward declaring. This is
useful in certain contexts, such as `preferred_type` annotations on
bit-fields.
According to [temp.names] p5:
> The keyword template shall not appear immediately after a declarative nested-name-specifier.
[expr.prim.id.qual] p2 defines a declarative nested-name-specifier as follows:
> A nested-name-specifier is declarative if it is part of
> - a class-head-name,
> - an enum-head-name,
> - a qualified-id that is the id-expression of a declarator-id, or
> - a declarative nested-name-specifier.
Note: I believe this definition is defective as it doesn't include _nested-name-specifiers_ appearing in _elaborated-type-specifiers_ that declare partial/explicit specializations and explicit instantiations. See my post to the core reflector. Minus a few bugs that are addressed by this PR, this is how we implement it.
This means that declarations like:
```
template<typename>
struct A
{
template<typename>
struct B
{
void f();
};
};
template<typename T>
template<typename U>
void A<T>::template B<U>::f() { } // error: 'template' cannot be used after a declarative nested name specifier
```
are ill-formed. This PR add diagnostics for such declarations. The name of the diagnostic group is `template-in-declaration-name`.
Regarding the aforementioned "few bugs that are addressed by this PR" in order to correctly implement this:
- `CheckClassTemplate` did not call `diagnoseQualifiedDeclaration` when the semantic context was dependent. This allowed for constructs like:
```
struct A
{
template<typename T>
struct B
{
template<typename U>
struct C;
};
};
template<typename T>
template<typename U>
struct decltype(A())::B<T>::C { };
```
- `ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization` did not call `diagnoseQualifiedDeclaration` at all, allowing for qualified partial/explicit specializations at class scope and other related nonsense
- `TreeTransform::TransformNestedNameSpecifierLoc` would rebuild a `NestedNameSpecifier::TypeSpecWithTemplate` as a `NestedNameSpecifier::TypeSpec`
- `TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc::initializeLocal` would set the `template` keyword `SourceLocation` to the provided `Loc` parameter, which would result in a `TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc` obtained via `ASTContext::getTrivialTypeSourceInfo` being displayed as always having a `template` prefix (since the presence of the keyword is not stored anywhere else).
Consider the following:
```
namespace N0 {
namespace N1 {
template<typename T>
int x1 = 0;
}
using namespace N1;
}
template<>
int N0::x1<int>;
```
According to [dcl.meaning.general] p3.3:
> - If the _declarator_ declares an explicit instantiation or a partial
or explicit specialization, the _declarator_ does not bind a name. If it
declares a class member, the terminal name of the _declarator-id_ is not
looked up; otherwise, **only those lookup results that are nominable in
`S` are considered when identifying any function template specialization
being declared**.
In particular, the requirement for lookup results to be nominal in the
lookup context of the terminal name of the _declarator-id_ only applies
to function template specializations -- not variable template
specializations. We currently reject the above declaration, but we do
(correctly) accept it if the using-directive is replaced with a `using`
declaration naming `N0::N1::x1`. This patch makes it so the above
specialization is (correctly) accepted.
This patch removes on-stack `TemplateArgumentList`'s. They were primary used
to pass an `ArrayRef<TemplateArgument>` to
`Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs`, which had a `const
TemplateArgumentList*` parameter for the innermost template argument
list. Changing this parameter to an
`std::optional<ArrayRef<TemplateArgument>>` eliminates the need for
on-stack `TemplateArgumentList`'s, which in turn eliminates the need for
`TemplateArgumentList` to store a pointer to its template argument
storage (which is redundant in almost all cases, as it is an AST
allocated type).
Implements https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2662R3.pdf
The feature is exposed as an extension in older language modes.
Mangling is not yet supported and that is something we will have to do before release.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20d0d2b1c5724bb17e969d036fced4cd, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted, then committed again
as 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786 and reverted again because
"dependency commit" 5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e was
reverted. But it doesn't seem that 5a391d38ac6c was a real dependency
for this.
This commit incorporates 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786 and
18e093faf726d15f210ab4917142beec51848258 by Richard Smith (@zygoloid),
with some minor fixes, most notably:
- `UncommonValue` renamed to `StructuralValue`
- `VK_PRValue` instead of `VK_RValue` as default kind in lvalue and
member pointer handling branch in
`BuildExpressionFromNonTypeTemplateArgumentValue`;
- handling of `StructuralValue` in `IsTypeDeclaredInsideVisitor`;
- filling in `SugaredConverted` along with `CanonicalConverted`
parameter in `Sema::CheckTemplateArgument`;
- minor cleanup in
`TemplateInstantiator::transformNonTypeTemplateParmRef`;
- `TemplateArgument` constructors refactored;
- `ODRHash` calculation for `UncommonValue`;
- USR generation for `UncommonValue`;
- more correct MS compatibility mangling algorithm (tested on MSVC ver.
19.35; toolset ver. 143);
- IR emitting fixed on using a subobject as a template argument when the
corresponding template parameter is used in an lvalue context;
- `noundef` attribute and opaque pointers in `template-arguments` test;
- analysis for C++17 mode is turned off for templates in
`warn-bool-conversion` test; in C++17 and C++20 mode, array reference
used as a template argument of pointer type produces template argument
of UncommonValue type, and
`BuildExpressionFromNonTypeTemplateArgumentValue` makes
`OpaqueValueExpr` for it, and `DiagnoseAlwaysNonNullPointer` cannot see
through it; despite of "These cases should not warn" comment, I'm not
sure about correct behavior; I'd expect a suggestion to replace `if` by
`if constexpr`;
- `temp.arg.nontype/p1.cpp` and `dr18xx.cpp` tests fixed.
Reland of #78387
Use the template pattern in determining whether to synthesize the
aggregate deduction guide, and update
DeclareImplicitDeductionGuideFromInitList to substitute outer template
arguments.
The tests in the original patch made an assumption about the size of a
pointer type, and this led to them failing on targets with 32-bit
pointers. The tests have been updated to not depend on the size of any
type. This only requires updates to the test file, no functionality has
otherwise changed between this and the original patch.
Use the template pattern in determining whether to synthesize the
aggregate deduction guide, and update
DeclareImplicitDeductionGuideFromInitList to substitute outer template
arguments.
Fixes#77599
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51710.
When transforming a constructor into a corresponding deduction guide,
the decayed types (function/array type) were not handled properly which
made clang fail to compile valid code. The patch teaches clang handle
these decayed type in the transformation.
Current context set to where alias was met, not where it is declared
caused incorrect access check in case alias referenced private members
of the parent class.
This is a recommit of 6b1aa31 with a slight modification in order to fix
reported regression.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41693
When checking if the constraint uses any enclosing template parameters
for [temp.friend]p9, if a containing record is used as argument, we
assume that the constraint depends on enclosing template parameters
without checking if the record is templated. The reproducer from the bug
is included as a test case.
Fixes#71595
If a template is defined via an external AST source, it won't have a
location. When we emit warnings about misusing such templates we
shouldn't emit a "template is declared here" warning with no location,
as that's just confusing.
Reviewers: llvm-beanz, erichkeane, AaronBallman
Reviewed By: erichkeane, AaronBallman
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71264
It was reported in the PR that commit caused clang giving errors for
code previously considered valid.
This reverts commit 6b1aa319754e76366edd88e10034e0539710d946.
Current context set to where alias was met, not where it is declared
caused incorrect access check in case alias referenced private members
of the parent class.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41693
Reland of f418319730341e9d41ce8ead6fbfe5603c343985 with proper handling
of template constructors
When a nested template is instantiated, the template pattern of the
inner class is not copied into the outer class
ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl. The specialization contains a
ClassTemplateDecl with an empty record that points to the original
template pattern instead.
As a result, when looking up the constructors of the inner class, no
results are returned. This patch finds the original template pattern and
uses that for the lookup instead.
Based on CWG2471 we must also substitute the known outer template
arguments when creating deduction guides for the inner class.
Changes from last iteration:
1. In template constructors, arguments are first rewritten to depth - 1
relative to the constructor as compared to depth 0 originally. These
arguments are needed for substitution into constraint expressions.
2. Outer arguments are then applied with the template instantiator to
produce a template argument at depth zero for use in the deduction
guide. This substitution does not evaluate constraints, which preserves
constraint arguments at the correct depth for later evaluation.
3. Tests are added that cover template constructors within nested
deduction guides for all special substitution cases.
4. Computation of the template pattern and outer instantiation arguments
are pulled into the constructor of
`ConvertConstructorToDeductionGuideTransform`.
When the top of the instantiation stack is in user code.
The goal of this PR is to allow deprecation of some char_traits
specializations in libc++ as done in https://reviews.llvm.org/D157058
which was later reverted by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66153#issuecomment-1719578384
as Clang never emitted the libc++ warnings.
Because Clang likes to eagerly instantiate, we can look for the location
of the top of the instantiation stack, and emit a warning if that
location is in user code.
The warning emission is forced by temporarily instructing the diag
engine not to silence warning in system headers.
This adds `UnexpandedParameterPackContext::UPPC_ExplicitSpecialization`
and passes it to `DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPack` when checking
class/variable template explicit specializations.
Right now we don't check for unexpanded packs in function template
explicit specializations at all, so I will be addressing that in a
followup PR.
This patch converts `CharacterLiteral::CharacterKind` to scoped enum in namespace scope. This enables forward declaration of this enum, which is useful in case like annotating bit-fields with `preferred_type`.
This patch introduces a new enumerator `Invalid = 0`, shifting other enumerators by +1. Contrary to how it might sound, this actually affirms status quo of how this enum is stored in `clang::Decl`:
```
/// If 0, we have not computed the linkage of this declaration.
/// Otherwise, it is the linkage + 1.
mutable unsigned CacheValidAndLinkage : 3;
```
This patch makes debuggers to not be mistaken about enumerator stored in this bit-field. It also converts `clang::Linkage` to a scoped enum.
This patch moves ElaboratedTypeKeyword before `Type` definition so that the enum is complete where bit-field for it is declared. It also converts it to scoped enum and removes `ETK_` prefix.
Reland of dd0fba11690f9fef304d5f48cde646e5eca8d3c0
When a nested template is instantiated, the template pattern of the
inner class is not copied into the outer class
ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl. The specialization contains a
ClassTemplateDecl with an empty record that points to the original
template pattern instead.
As a result, when looking up the constructors of the inner class, no
results are returned. This patch finds the original template pattern and
uses that for the lookup instead.
Based on CWG2471 we must also substitute the known outer template
arguments when creating deduction guides for the inner class.
Changes from the last iteration:
1. The outer retained levels from the outer template are always added to
the `MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList` for rewriting
`FunctionTemplateDecl` arguments, even if there is no FTD and the
arguments are empty.
2. When building implicit deduction guides, the template pattern
underlying decl is pushed as the current context. This resolves the
issue where `FindInstantiatedDecl` is unable to find the inner template
class.
3. Tests are updated to cover the failing case, and to assert that the
type is correct after argument deduction in the implicit case.
Out of line class template declaration specializations aren't created at
the time they have their template arguments checked, so we previously
weren't doing any amount of work to substitute the constraints before
comparison. This resulted in the out of line definition's difference in
'depth' causing the constraints to compare differently.
This patch corrects that. Additionally, it handles ClassTemplateDecl
when collecting template arguments.
Fixes: #61763
The dependence of a template argument is not only determined by the
argument itself, but also by the type of the template parameter:
> Furthermore, a non-type
[template-argument](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names#nt:template-argument)
is dependent if the corresponding non-type
[template-parameter](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.param#nt:template-parameter)
is of reference or pointer type and the
[template-argument](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.names#nt:template-argument)
designates or points to a member of the current instantiation or a
member of a dependent
type[.](https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.dep#temp-3.sentence-1)
For example:
```cpp
struct A{};
template <const A& T>
const A JoinStringViews = T;
template <int V>
class Builder {
public:
static constexpr A Equal{};
static constexpr auto Val = JoinStringViews<Equal>;
};
```
The constant expression `Equal` is not dependent, but because the type
of the template parameter is a reference type and `Equal` is a member of
the current instantiation, the template argument of
`JoinStringViews<Equal>` is actually dependent, which makes
`JoinStringViews<Equal>` dependent.
When a template-id of a variable template is dependent,
`CheckVarTemplateId` will return an `UnresolvedLookupExpr`, but
`UnresolvedLookupExpr` calculates dependence by template arguments only
(the `ConstantExpr` `Equal` here), which is not dependent. This causes
type deduction to think that `JoinStringViews<Equal>` is `OverloadTy`
and treat it as a function template, which is clearly wrong.
This PR adds a `KnownDependent` parameter to the constructor of
`UnresolvedLookupExpr`. After canonicalization, if `CanonicalConverted`
contains any dependent argument, `KnownDependent` is set to `true`. This
fixes the dependence calculation of `UnresolvedLookupExpr` for dependent
variable templates.
Fixes#65153 .
This reverts commit dd0fba11690f9fef304d5f48cde646e5eca8d3c0.
It fails on nested classes that have both an explicit deduction guide and
a constructor that has an argument of the same type as the class (i.e. a copy constructor).
When a nested template is instantiated, the template pattern of the
inner class is not copied into the outer class
ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl. The specialization contains a
ClassTemplateDecl with an empty record that points to the original
template pattern instead.
As a result, when looking up the constructors of the inner class, no
results are returned. This patch finds the original template pattern and
uses that for the lookup instead.
Based on CWG2471 we must also substitute the known outer template
arguments when creating deduction guides for the inner class.
Fixes#46200Fixes#57812
This removes the `ClassScopeFunctionSpecializationDecl` `Decl` node, and
instead uses `DependentFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo` to handle
such declarations. `DependentFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo` is also
changed to store a `const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo*` to be more in
line with `FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo`.
This also changes `FunctionDecl::isFunctionTemplateSpecialization` to
return `true` for dependent specializations, and
`FunctionDecl::getTemplateSpecializationKind`/`FunctionDecl::getTemplateSpecializationKindForInstantiation`
to return `TSK_ExplicitSpecialization` for non-friend dependent
specializations (the same behavior as dependent class scope
`ClassTemplateSepcializationDecl` & `VarTemplateSepcializationDecl`).
The goal of this change is to clean up some of the code surrounding
HLSL using CXXThisExpr as a non-pointer l-value. This change cleans up
a bunch of assumptions and inconsistencies around how the type of
`this` is handled through the AST and code generation.
This change is be mostly NFC for HLSL, and completely NFC for other
language modes.
This change introduces a new member to query for the this object's type
and seeks to clarify the normal usages of the this type.
With the introudction of HLSL to clang, CXXThisExpr may now be an
l-value and behave like a reference type rather than C++'s normal
method of it being an r-value of pointer type.
With this change there are now three ways in which a caller might need
to query the type of `this`:
* The type of the `CXXThisExpr`
* The type of the object `this` referrs to
* The type of the implicit (or explicit) `this` argument
This change codifies those three ways you may need to query
respectively as:
* CXXMethodDecl::getThisType()
* CXXMethodDecl::getThisObjectType()
* CXXMethodDecl::getThisArgType()
This change then revisits all uses of `getThisType()`, and in cases
where the only use was to resolve the pointee type, it replaces the
call with `getThisObjectType()`. In other cases it evaluates whether
the desired returned type is the type of the `this` expr, or the type
of the `this` function argument. The `this` expr type is used for
creating additional expr AST nodes and for member lookup, while the
argument type is used mostly for code generation.
Additionally some cases that used `getThisType` in simple queries could
be substituted for `getThisObjectType`. Since `getThisType` is
implemented in terms of `getThisObjectType` calling the later should be
more efficient if the former isn't needed.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, bogner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159247
