`statistics dump` command relies on `SymbolFile::GetDebugInfoSize()` to
get total debug info size.
The current implementation is missing debug info for split dwarf
scenarios which requires getting debug info from separate dwo/dwp files.
This patch fixes this issue for split dwarf by parsing debug info from
dwp/dwo.
New yaml tests are added.
---------
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.
Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.
I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.
I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.
I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.
I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.
I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.
I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.
I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.
There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.
I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.
As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.
Re-landing this patch after fixing two undefined behaviors in
WatchpointAlgorithms found by UBSan and by failures on different
CI bots.
rdar://108234227
The way the locals are laid out on the stack on x86-64 Debian is
resulting in a test failure with the new large watchpoint support.
Collecting more logging before I revert/debug it.
This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.
Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.
I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.
I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.
I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.
I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.
I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.
I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.
I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.
There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.
I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.
As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.
rdar://108234227
This file used a strange, multi-level setup where we skipped on
a function we used for xfailing. Let's not do that, just skip
the one test we care about.
Also added a comment to explain how this file works. The tests
*want* calls to fail when we ask for only hardware breaks
but have none to use.
If you don't know that, it all seems backwards.
Temporarily revert to unblock the CI bots, this is breaking the -DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On
modules style build. I've notified Ismail.
This reverts commit 888501bc631c4f6d373b4081ff6c504a1ce4a682.
This patch makes ScriptedThreadPlan conforming to the ScriptedInterface
& ScriptedPythonInterface facilities by introducing 2
ScriptedThreadPlanInterface & ScriptedThreadPlanPythonInterface classes.
This allows us to get rid of every ScriptedThreadPlan-specific SWIG
method and re-use the same affordances as other scripting offordances,
like Scripted{Process,Thread,Platform} & OperatingSystem.
To do so, this adds new transformer methods for `ThreadPlan`, `Stream` &
`Event`, to allow the bijection between C++ objects and their python
counterparts.
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
On macOS, the formatter is printing signed values as
unsigned, it seems, and the tests are expecting correctly
signed values. These tests were added in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78609
Starting with macOS 14, the `NSTimeZone` and `CFTimeZone` types are backed by swift
implementations. These tests won't pass on mainline lldb, since it doesn't have Swift
support.
The new static linker in Xcode 15 does not emit the necessary
symbols for file static thread local storage, causing this test
to fail when used. The old static linker is still available
as ld-classic in Xcode 15, but it has to be invoked specially, and
the new static linker will be fixed at some point. I may try to
add linker name and versioning information in
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/decorators.py like we do with
the compiler / compiler_version, so it can be xfailed for known
problematic static linker name / versions, but until I get that
sorted I'm skipping this test to unblock the CI bots.
The @expectedFailureAll and @skipIf decorators will mark the test case
as xfail/skip if _all_ conditions passed in match, including debug_info.
* If debug_info is not one of the matching conditions, we can
immediately evaluate the check and decide if it should be decorated.
* If debug_info *is* present as a match condition, we need to defer
whether or not to decorate until when the `LLDBTestCaseFactory`
metaclass expands the test case into its potential variants. This is
still early enough that the standard `unittest` framework will recognize
the test as xfail/skip by the time the test actually runs.
TestDecorators exhibits the edge cases more thoroughly. With the
exception of `@expectedFailureIf` (added by this commit), all those test
cases pass prior to this commit.
This is a followup to 212a60ec37322f853e91e171b305479b1abff2f2.
Fix the bug where merge-fdata unconditionally outputs boltedcollection
line, regardless of whether input files have it set.
Test Plan:
Added bolt/test/X86/merge-fdata-nobat-mode.test which fails without this
fix.
For example, the following message has the severity string "error: "
twice.
> "error: <EXPR>:3:1: error: cannot find 'bogus' in scope
This method already appends the severity string in the beginning, but
with this fix, it also removes a secondary instance, if applicable.
Note that this change only removes the *first* redundant substring. I
considered putting the removal logic in a loop, but I decided that if
something is generating more than one redundant severity substring, then
that's a problem the message's source should probably fix.
rdar://114203423
The previous logic for determining if an expression was a command or
variable expression in the repl would incorrectly identify the context
in many common cases where a local variable name partially overlaps with
the repl input.
For example:
```
int foo() {
int var = 1; // break point, evaluating "p var", previously emitted a warning
}
```
Instead of checking potentially multiple conflicting values against the
expression input, I updated the heuristic to only consider the first
term. This is much more reliable at eliminating false positives when the
input does not actually hide a local variable.
Additionally, I updated the warning on conflicts to occur anytime the
conflict is detected since the specific conflict can change based on the
current input. This also includes additional details on how users can
change the behavior.
Example Debug Console output from
lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-dap/evaluate/main.cpp:11 breakpoint 3.
```
lldb-dap> var + 3
Warning: Expression 'var' is both an LLDB command and variable. It will be evaluated as a variable. To evaluate the expression as an LLDB command, use '`' as a prefix.
45
lldb-dap> var + 1
Warning: Expression 'var' is both an LLDB command and variable. It will be evaluated as a variable. To evaluate the expression as an LLDB command, use '`' as a prefix.
43
```
ELF does not have a hard distinction between shared libraries (and
position-independent) executables. It is possible to create a shared
library that will also be executable.
We claim in a couple places that the zeroth element of the module list
for a target is the main executable, but we don't actually enforce that
in the ModuleList class. As we saw, for instance, in
32dd5b20973bde1ef77fa3b84b9f85788a1a303a
it's not all that hard to get this to be off. This patch ensures that
the first object file of type Executable added to it is moved to the
front of the ModuleList. I also added a test for this.
In the normal course of operation, where the executable is added first,
this only adds a check for whether the first element in the module list
is an executable. If that's true, we just append as normal.
Note, the code in Target::GetExecutableModule doesn't actually agree
that the zeroth element must be the executable, it instead returns the
first Module of type Executable. But I can't tell whether that was a
change in intention or just working around the bug that we don't always
maintain this ordering. But given we've said this in scripting as well
as internally, I think we shouldn't change our minds about this.
This is a speculative fix for TestRosetta.py which is currently failing
on Green Dragon.
TestRosetta just makes sure we can debug an x86_64 process on Apple
Silicon. However, we're failing to build the x86_64 test binary. The
linker is failing with some warnings about libc++ and libunwind being
build for arm64 while the target binary is x86_64. I'm going to try
building with the system standard libraries instead of the just-built
ones to workaround it.
The test TestTrimmedProgressReporting tests that progress reports are
being sent by listening for events with the titles of specific progress
reports. Commit f1ef910b removed the report for Apple DWARF indices
which was one of the reports being listened for in this test, so that
report is removed here as well.
That commit also now creates all progress reports with details so
reports string are prepended with the details count. This changes the
length of the trimmed progress report title string that's checked for
here so this commit changes the string to match as well.
This test was skipped on non-Apple platforms, but since the progress
report for Apple DWARF indices has been removed this commit removes that
decorator.
Per this RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improve-lldb-progress-reporting/75717
on improving progress reports, this commit separates the title field and
details field so that the title specifies the category that the progress
report falls under. The details field is added as a part of the
constructor for progress reports and by default is an empty string. In addition, changes the total amount of progress completed into a std::optional. Also
updates the test to check for details being correctly reported from the
event structured data dictionary.
This is a followup of #76983 and adds the libc++ data formatters for
- weekday,
- weekday_indexed,
- weekday_last,
- month_weekday,
- month_weekday_last,
- year_month,
- year_month_day_last
- year_month_weekday, and
- year_month_weekday_last.
When generating a `display_value` for a variable the current approach
calls `SBValue::GetValue()` and `SBValue::GetSummary()` to generate a
`display_value` for the `SBValue`. However, there are cases where both
of these return an empty string and the fallback is to print a pointer
and type name instead (e.g. `FooBarType @ 0x00321`).
For swift types, lldb includes a langauge runtime plugin that can
generate a description of the object but this is only used with
`SBValue::GetDescription()`.
For example:
```
$ lldb swift-binary
... stop at breakpoint ...
lldb> script
>>> event = lldb.frame.GetValueForVariablePath("event")
>>> print("Value", event.GetValue())
Value None
>>> print("Summary", event.GetSummary())
Summary None
>>> print("Description", event) # __str__ calls SBValue::GetDescription()
Description (main.Event) event = (name = "Greetings", time = 2024-01-04 23:38:06 UTC)
```
With this change, if GetValue and GetSummary return empty then we try
`SBValue::GetDescription()` as a fallback before using the previous
logic of printing `<type> @ <addr>`.
The "kern ver str" LC_NOTE gives lldb a kernel version string -- with a
UUID and/or a load address (stext) to load it at. The LC_NOTE specifies
a size of the identifier string in bytes. In
ObjectFileMachO::GetIdentifierString, I copy that number of bytes into a
std::string, and in case there were additional nul characters at the end
of the sting for padding reasons, I tried to shrink the std::string to
not include these extra nul's.
However, I did this resizing without handling the case of an empty
identifier string. I don't know why any corefile creator would do that,
but of course at least one does. This patch removes the resizing
altogether; I was solving something that hasn't ever shown to be a
problem. I also added a test case for this, to check that lldb doesn't
crash when given one of these corefiles.
rdar://120390199
This adds a subset of the C++20 calendar data formatters:
- day,
- month,
- year,
- month_day,
- month_day_last, and
- year_month_day.
A followup patch will add the missing calendar data formatters:
- weekday,
- weekday_indexed,
- weekday_last,
- month_weekday,
- month_weekday_last,
- year_month,
- year_month_day_last
- year_month_weekday, and
- year_month_weekday_last.
The LLDB expression parser relies on using the external AST source
support in LLDB. This allows us to find a class at the root namespace
level, but it wouldn't allow us to find nested classes all of the time.
When LLDB finds a class via this mechanism, it would be able to complete
this class when needed, but during completion, we wouldn't populate
nested types within this class which would prevent us from finding
contained types when needed as clang would expect them to be present if
a class was completed. When we parse a type for a class, struct or
union, we make a forward declaration to the class which can be
completed. Now when the class is completed, we also add any contained
types to the class' declaration context which now allows these types to
be found. If we have a struct that contains a struct, we will add the
forward declaration of the contained structure which can be c ompleted
later. Having this forward declaration makes it possible for LLDB to
find everything it needs now.
This should fix an existing issue:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53904
Previously, contained types could be parsed by accident and allow
expression to complete successfully. Other times we would have to run an
expression multiple times because our old type lookup from our
expressions would cau se a type to be parsed, but not used in the
current expression, but this would have parsed a type into the
containing decl context and the expression might succeed if it is run
again.
LLVM supports DWARF 5 linetable extension to store source files inline
in DWARF. This is particularly useful for compiler-generated source
code. This implementation tries to materialize them as temporary files
lazily, so SBAPI clients don't need to be aware of them.
rdar://110926168
BreakpointResolverAddress optionally can include the module name related
to the address that gets resolved. Currently this will never work
because it sets the name to itself (which is empty).
These are expected to fail but sometimes crash during the test leaving them
as unresolved.
Same failure message and likely same cause as the other test in this file.
In order to allow smarter vscode extensions, it's useful to send
additional structured information of SBValues to the client.
Specifically, I'm now sending error, summary, autoSummary and
inMemoryValue in addition to the existing properties being sent. This is
cheap because these properties have to be calculated anyway to generate
the display value of the variable, but they are now available for
extensions to better analyze variables. For example, if the error field
is not present, the extension might be able to provide cool features,
and the current way to do that is to look for the `"<error: "` prefix,
which is error-prone.
This also incorporates a tiny feedback from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74865#issuecomment-1850695477
TestGlobalModuleCache.py, a recently added test, tries to update a
source file in the build directory, but it assumes the file is writable.
In our distributed build and test system, this is not always true, so
the test often fails with a write permissions error.
This change fixes that by setting the permissions on the file to be
writable before attempting to write to it.
