377 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Robert Imschweiler
c9a3ab293b
[AMDGPU][UnifyLoopExits] Fix duplicate successor handling (#170759)
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/170730

Maybe I can also come up with a more elegant solution. But I think it
wouldn't make a lot of sense trying to avoid multiple "fake" target
blocks. Would require a mapping between original and fake target
blocks...
2025-12-08 13:48:19 -05:00
Lucie Choi
cf7c255b10
[JumpThread] Fix JumpThreading pass to skip merging when both blocks contain convergence loop/entry intrinsics. (#170247)
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/165642. After this
fix, optimization passes for the example in the bug.

[LLVM
Spec](https://llvm.org/docs/ConvergentOperations.html#llvm-experimental-convergence-loop)
states that only a single loop / entry convergence token can be included
in a basic block.

This PR fixes the issue in `JumpThreading` pass so that when a basic
block and its predecessor both contain such convergence intrinsics, it
skips merging the two blocks.
2025-12-05 02:53:56 +09:00
Lucie Choi
9ffd2e40c1
[SimplifyCFG] Fix SimplifyCFG pass to skip folding when both blocks contain convergence loop/entry intrinsics. (#166452)
Fixes a bug https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/165642. [Similar
fix](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165643) is being made in
`IndVarSimplify` pass to account for convergence tokens.

[LLVM
Spec](https://llvm.org/docs/ConvergentOperations.html#llvm-experimental-convergence-loop)
states that only a single loop / entry convergence token can be included
in a basic block.

This PR fixes the issue in `SimplifyCFG` pass so that when a basic block
and its predecessor both contain such convergence intrinsics, it skips
merging the two blocks.
2025-11-30 06:57:06 +09:00
Robert Imschweiler
89540114a7
[AMDGPU][FixIrreducible][UnifyLoopExits] Support callbr with inline-asm (#149308)
First batch of changes to add support for inline-asm callbr for the
AMDGPU backend.
2025-10-30 14:22:42 +01:00
Robert Imschweiler
6fca138118
[BasicBlockUtils] Add BasicBlock printer (#163066) 2025-10-22 17:47:14 +02:00
Gábor Spaits
0a47e8c2fc
Reland [BasicBlockUtils] Handle funclets when detaching EH pad blocks (#159379)
Fixes #148052 .

Last PR did not account for the scenario, when more than one instruction
used the `catchpad` label.
In that case I have deleted uses, which were already "choosen to be
iterated over" by the early increment iterator. This issue was not
visible in normal release build on x86, but luckily later on the address
sanitizer build it has found it on the buildbot.

Here is the diff from the last version of this PR: #158435
```diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp
index 91e245e5e8f5..1dd8cb4ee584 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ void llvm::detachDeadBlocks(ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> BBs,
       // first block, the we would have possible cleanupret and catchret
       // instructions with poison arguments, which wouldn't be valid.
       if (isa<FuncletPadInst>(I)) {
-        for (User *User : make_early_inc_range(I.users())) {
+        SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 4> UniqueEHRetBlocksToDelete;
+        for (User *User : I.users()) {
           Instruction *ReturnInstr = dyn_cast<Instruction>(User);
           // If we have a cleanupret or catchret block, replace it with just an
           // unreachable. The other alternative, that may use a catchpad is a
@@ -114,33 +115,12 @@ void llvm::detachDeadBlocks(ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> BBs,
           if (isa<CatchReturnInst>(ReturnInstr) ||
               isa<CleanupReturnInst>(ReturnInstr)) {
             BasicBlock *ReturnInstrBB = ReturnInstr->getParent();
-            // This catchret or catchpad basic block is detached now. Let the
-            // successors know it.
-            // This basic block also may have some predecessors too. For
-            // example the following LLVM-IR is valid:
-            //
-            //   [cleanuppad_block]
-            //            |
-            //    [regular_block]
-            //            |
-            //   [cleanupret_block]
-            //
-            // The IR after the cleanup will look like this:
-            //
-            //   [cleanuppad_block]
-            //            |
-            //    [regular_block]
-            //            |
-            //     [unreachable]
-            //
-            // So regular_block will lead to an unreachable block, which is also
-            // valid. There is no need to replace regular_block with unreachable
-            // in this context now.
-            // On the other hand, the cleanupret/catchret block's successors
-            // need to know about the deletion of their predecessors.
-            emptyAndDetachBlock(ReturnInstrBB, Updates, KeepOneInputPHIs);
+            UniqueEHRetBlocksToDelete.insert(ReturnInstrBB);
           }
         }
+        for (BasicBlock *EHRetBB :
+             make_early_inc_range(UniqueEHRetBlocksToDelete))
+          emptyAndDetachBlock(EHRetBB, Updates, KeepOneInputPHIs);
       }
     }
```
2025-09-19 17:00:17 -07:00
Gábor Spaits
88c64f76ed
Revert "Reland "[BasicBlockUtils] Handle funclets when detaching EH p… (#159292)
…ad blocks" (#158435)"

This reverts commit 41cef78227eb909181cb9360099b2d92de8d649f.
2025-09-17 09:44:17 +00:00
Gábor Spaits
41cef78227
Reland "[BasicBlockUtils] Handle funclets when detaching EH pad blocks" (#158435)
When removing EH Pad blocks, the value defined by them becomes poison. These poison values are then used by `catchret` and `cleanupret`, which is invalid. This commit replaces those unreachable `catchret` and `cleanupret` instructions with `unreachable`.
2025-09-17 09:47:29 +02:00
Arthur Eubanks
b30c29c893
Revert "[BasicBlockUtils] Handle funclets when detaching EH pad blocks" (#158364)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#157363

Causes crashes, see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157363#issuecomment-3286783238
2025-09-14 19:58:48 +00:00
Gábor Spaits
43561ad204
[BasicBlockUtils] Handle funclets when detaching EH pad blocks (#157363)
Fixes #148052 .

When removing EH Pad blocks, the value defined by them becomes poison. These poison values are then used by `catchret` and `cleanupret`, which is invalid. This commit replaces those unreachable `catchret` and `cleanupret` instructions with `unreachable`.
2025-09-11 22:52:16 +02:00
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
6c9352530a
[RemoveDIs][NFC] Clean up BasicBlockUtils now intrinsics are gone (#154326)
A couple of minor readability changes now that we're not supporting both
intrinsics and records.
2025-08-20 10:03:44 +01:00
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
352baa386c
[RemoveDIs] Resolve RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs fwd scan FIXME (#144718)
These FIXMEs were added to keep the dbg_record implementation identical to the
dbg intrinsic versions, which have since been removed. I don't think there's any
reason for the old behaviour; my understanding is it was a minor bug no one got
round to fixing.

I've upgraded the test to be written with dbg_records while I'm here.
2025-06-24 13:09:49 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
05cd32adb7
[llvm] Remove unused includes (NFC) (#144293)
These are identified by misc-include-cleaner.  I've filtered out those
that break builds.  Also, I'm staying away from llvm-config.h,
config.h, and Compiler.h, which likely cause platform- or
compiler-specific build failures.
2025-06-16 08:59:18 -07:00
Jeremy Morse
97ac6483aa
[DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Delete debug-info-format flag (#143746)
This flag was used to let us incrementally introduce debug records
into LLVM, however everything is now using records. It serves no
purpose now, so delete it.
2025-06-12 11:51:58 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
85f3d60d81
[Utils] Use range-based for loops (NFC) (#139426) 2025-05-10 22:50:46 -07:00
Nikita Popov
c96f019fa3
[BasicBlockUtils] Remove broken support for eh pads in SplitEdge() (#137816)
d81d9e8b8604c85709de0a22bb8dd672a28f0401 changed SplitEdge() to make use
of ehAwareSplitEdge() for critical edges where the target is an eh pad.
However, the implementation is incorrect at least for landing pads. What
is currently produced for the code in the modified unit test is
something like this:

    continue:
      invoke void @sink()
              to label %normal unwind label %new_bb

    new_bb:
      %cp = cleanuppad within %exception []
      cleanupret from %cp unwind label %exception

    exception:
      %cleanup = landingpad i8 cleanup
      br label %trivial-eh-handler

This mixes different exception handling mechanisms in a nonsensical way,
and is not well-formed IR. To actually "split" the landingpad edge (for
a rather loose definition of "split"), I think we'd have to generate
something along these lines:

      exception.split:
        %cleanup.split = landingpad i8 cleanup
        br label %exception.cont

      exception:
        %cleanup.orig = landingpad i8 cleanup
        br label %exception.cont
      
      exception.cont:
%cleanup = phi i8 [ %cleanup.split, %exception_split ], [ %cleanup.orig,
%exception ]

I didn't bother actually implementing that, seeing as how nobody noticed
the existing codegen being broken in the last four years, so clearly
nobody actually needs this function to work with EH edges. Just return
nullptr instead.
2025-04-30 09:07:55 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
5cfd81b0cc
[llvm] Use range constructors of *Set (NFC) (#137552) 2025-04-27 15:59:57 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
b2ba53172e
[Transforms] Construct SmallVector with iterator ranges (NFC) (#136259) 2025-04-18 10:27:05 -07:00
Mircea Trofin
a6208ce4c1
[nfc] move isPresplitCoroSuspendExitEdge to Analysis/CFG (#135849) 2025-04-15 15:07:03 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
cde58bfc16
[Transforms] Use range constructors of *Set (NFC) (#133203) 2025-03-27 07:51:58 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
1b189cab5e
[llvm] Use *Set::insert_range (NFC) (#132509)
DenseSet, SmallPtrSet, SmallSet, SetVector, and StringSet recently
gained C++23-style insert_range.  This patch uses insert_range in
conjunction with llvm::{predecessors,successors} and
MachineBasicBlock::{predecessors,successors}.
2025-03-22 08:07:33 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
9455df969e
[Transforms] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC) (#131556) 2025-03-17 07:43:12 -07:00
Jeremy Morse
34b139594a
[NFC][DebugInfo] Switch more call-sites to using iterator-insertion (#124283)
To finalise the "RemoveDIs" work removing debug intrinsics, we're
updating call sites that insert instructions to use iterators instead.
This set of changes are those where it's not immediately obvious that
just calling getIterator to fetch an iterator is correct, and one or two
places where more than one line needs to change.

Overall the same rule holds though: iterators generated for the start of
a block such as getFirstNonPHIIt need to be passed into insert/move
methods without being unwrapped/rewrapped, everything else can use
getIterator.
2025-01-27 16:44:14 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
e14962a39c
[NFC][DebugInfo] Use iterators for instruction insertion in more places (#124291)
As part of the "RemoveDIs" work to eliminate debug intrinsics, we're
replacing methods that use Instruction*'s as positions with iterators.
This patch changes some more complex call-sites, those crossing file
boundaries and where I've had to perform some minor rewrites.
2025-01-27 15:25:17 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
8e70273509
[NFC][DebugInfo] Use iterator moveBefore at many call-sites (#123583)
As part of the "RemoveDIs" project, BasicBlock::iterator now carries a
debug-info bit that's needed when getFirstNonPHI and similar feed into
instruction insertion positions. Call-sites where that's necessary were
updated a year ago; but to ensure some type safety however, we'd like to
have all calls to moveBefore use iterators.

This patch adds a (guaranteed dereferenceable) iterator-taking
moveBefore, and changes a bunch of call-sites where it's obviously safe
to change to use it by just calling getIterator() on an instruction
pointer. A follow-up patch will contain less-obviously-safe changes.

We'll eventually deprecate and remove the instruction-pointer
insertBefore, but not before adding concise documentation of what
considerations are needed (very few).
2025-01-24 10:53:11 +00:00
Kazu Hirata
4048c64306
[llvm] Remove redundant control flow statements (NFC) (#115831)
Identified with readability-redundant-control-flow.
2024-11-12 10:09:42 -08:00
Jeremy Morse
056a3f4673 [NFC] Reapply 3f37c517f, SmallDenseMap speedups
This time with 100% more building unit tests. Original commit message follows.

[NFC] Switch a number of DenseMaps to SmallDenseMaps for speedup (#109417)

If we use SmallDenseMaps instead of DenseMaps at these locations,
we get a substantial speedup because there's less spurious malloc
traffic. Discovered by instrumenting DenseMap with some accounting
code, then selecting sites where we'll get the most bang for our buck.
2024-09-26 10:49:29 +01:00
Jeremy Morse
817e742ba5 Revert "[NFC] Switch a number of DenseMaps to SmallDenseMaps for speedup (#109417)"
This reverts commit 3f37c517fbc40531571f8b9f951a8610b4789cd6.

Lo and behold, I missed a unit test
2024-09-25 14:31:30 +01:00
Jeremy Morse
3f37c517fb
[NFC] Switch a number of DenseMaps to SmallDenseMaps for speedup (#109417)
If we use SmallDenseMaps instead of DenseMaps at these locations,
we get a substantial speedup because there's less spurious malloc
traffic. Discovered by instrumenting DenseMap with some accounting
code, then selecting sites where we'll get the most bang for our buck.
2024-09-25 14:22:23 +01:00
Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
5f6172f068 [Transforms] Refactor CreateControlFlowHub (#103013)
CreateControlFlowHub is a method that redirects control flow edges from a set of
incoming blocks to a set of outgoing blocks through a new set of "guard" blocks.
This is now refactored into a separate file with one enhancement: The input to
the method is now a set of branches rather than two sets of blocks.

The original implementation reroutes every edge from incoming blocks to outgoing
blocks. But it is possible that for some incoming block InBB, some successor S
might be in the set of outgoing blocks, but that particular edge should not be
rerouted. The new implementation makes this possible by allowing the user to
specify the targets of each branch that need to be rerouted.

This is needed when improving the implementation of FixIrreducible #101386.
Current use in FixIrreducible does not demonstrate this finer control over the
edges being rerouted. But in UnifyLoopExits, when only one successor of an
exiting block is an exit block, this refinement now reroutes only the relevant
control-flow through the edge; the non-exit successor is not rerouted. This
results in fewer branches and PHI nodes in the hub.
2024-08-22 12:18:01 +05:30
Johannes Doerfert
f227dc9ca2
[UnifyLoopExits] Never generate phis of only undef values (#99924) 2024-07-23 09:28:37 -07:00
Nikita Popov
2d209d964a
[IR] Add getDataLayout() helpers to BasicBlock and Instruction (#96902)
This is a helper to avoid writing `getModule()->getDataLayout()`. I
regularly try to use this method only to remember it doesn't exist...

`getModule()->getDataLayout()` is also a common (the most common?)
reason why code has to include the Module.h header.
2024-06-27 16:38:15 +02:00
AdityaK
42d99013bd
NFC: Add a comment indicating UpdateAnalysisInformation invalidates DFS Numbering (#91252) 2024-05-08 11:03:46 -07:00
Jorge Gorbe Moya
2cde0e2f97 Revert "[BasicBlockUtils] Remove redundant llvm.dbg instructions after blocks to reduce compile time (#89069)"
This reverts commit 2e3e0868748635b779ba89a772eae3664bd822e4. It caused
quadratic slowdown at compilation time in some cases. See the comments
in the original PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89069
2024-05-03 13:05:08 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
53cda4ca3b [Transforms] Use LLVMContext::MD_loop (NFC) 2024-04-28 20:18:03 -07:00
CL
2e3e086874
[BasicBlockUtils] Remove redundant llvm.dbg instructions after blocks to reduce compile time (#89069)
this patch is to fix the compile time for some cases, before this
change, some targets (riscv-64, ve) will spend much more compile time on
this case (https://godbolt.org/z/rrov17cTo). With this change, the
compile time was reduced a lot.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/89073

PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89069
2024-04-26 10:57:37 +01:00
NAKAMURA Takumi
d08a76d1ac Fix warnings discovered by #87348 [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 2024-04-07 11:02:08 +09:00
Stephen Tozer
bdc77d1ecc
[RemoveDIs][NFC] Rename DPLabel->DbgLabelRecord (#85918)
This patch renames DPLabel to DbgLabelRecord, in accordance with the
ongoing DbgRecord rename. This rename was fairly trivial, since DPLabel
isn't as widely used as DPValue and has no real conflicts in either its
full or abbreviated name. As usual, the entire replacement was done
automatically, with `s/DPLabel/DbgLabelRecord/` and `s/DPL/DLR/`.
2024-03-20 13:11:28 +00:00
Stephen Tozer
ffd08c7759
[RemoveDIs][NFC] Rename DPValue -> DbgVariableRecord (#85216)
This is the major rename patch that prior patches have built towards.
The DPValue class is being renamed to DbgVariableRecord, which reflects
the updated terminology for the "final" implementation of the RemoveDI
feature. This is a pure string substitution + clang-format patch. The
only manual component of this patch was determining where to perform
these string substitutions: `DPValue` and `DPV` are almost exclusively
used for DbgRecords, *except* for:

- llvm/lib/target, where 'DP' is used to mean double-precision, and so
appears as part of .td files and in variable names. NB: There is a
single existing use of `DPValue` here that refers to debug info, which
I've manually updated.
- llvm/tools/gold, where 'LDPV' is used as a prefix for symbol
visibility enums.

Outside of these places, I've applied several basic string
substitutions, with the intent that they only affect DbgRecord-related
identifiers; I've checked them as I went through to verify this, with
reasonable confidence that there are no unintended changes that slipped
through the cracks. The substitutions applied are all case-sensitive,
and are applied in the order shown:

```
  DPValue -> DbgVariableRecord
  DPVal -> DbgVarRec
  DPV -> DVR
```

Following the previous rename patches, it should be the case that there
are no instances of any of these strings that are meant to refer to the
general case of DbgRecords, or anything other than the DPValue class.
The idea behind this patch is therefore that pure string substitution is
correct in all cases as long as these assumptions hold.
2024-03-19 20:07:07 +00:00
Stephen Tozer
2e865353ed
[RemoveDIs][NFC] Move DPValue::filter -> filterDbgVars (#85208)
This patch changes DPValue::filter to be a non-member method
filterDbgVars. There are two reasons for this: firstly, the name of
DPValue is about to change to DbgVariableRecord, which will result in
every `for` loop that uses DPValue::filter to require a line break. This
is a small thing, but it makes the rename patch more difficult to
review, and is just generally more awkward for what is a fairly common
loop. Secondly, the intent is to later break up the DPValue class into
subclasses, at which point it would be better to have a non-member
function that allows template arguments for the cases we want to filter
with greater specificity.
2024-03-14 12:19:15 +00:00
Stephen Tozer
15f3f446c5
[RemoveDIs][NFC] Rename common interface functions for DPValues->DbgRecords (#84793)
As part of the effort to rename the DbgRecord classes, this patch
renames the widely-used functions that operate on DbgRecords but refer
to DbgValues or DPValues in their names to refer to DbgRecords instead;
all such functions are defined in one of `BasicBlock.h`,
`Instruction.h`, and `DebugProgramInstruction.h`.

This patch explicitly does not change the names of any comments or
variables, except for where they use the exact name of one of the
renamed functions. The reason for this is reviewability; this patch can
be trivially examined to determine that the only changes are direct
string substitutions and any results from clang-format responding to the
changed line lengths. Future patches will cover renaming variables and
comments, and then renaming the classes themselves.
2024-03-12 14:53:13 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
6b62a9135a [RemoveDIs] Reapply 3fda50d3915, insert instructions using iterators
I'd reverted this in 6c7805d5d1 after a bad stage. Original commit
messsage follows:

[NFC][RemoveDIs] Bulk update utilities to insert with iterators

As part of the RemoveDIs project we need LLVM to insert instructions using
iterators wherever possible, so that the iterators can carry a bit of
debug-info. This commit implements some of that by updating the contents of
llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils to always use iterator-versions of instruction
constructors.

There are two general flavours of update:
 * Almost all call-sites just call getIterator on an instruction
 * Several make use of an existing iterator (scenarios where the code is
   actually significant for debug-info)
The underlying logic is that any call to getFirstInsertionPt or similar
APIs that identify the start of a block need to have that iterator passed
directly to the insertion function, without being converted to a bare
Instruction pointer along the way.

I've also switched DemotePHIToStack to take an optional iterator: it needs
to take an iterator, and having a no-insert-location behaviour appears to
be important. The constructors for ICmpInst and FCmpInst have been updated
too. They're the only instructions that take block _references_ rather than
pointers for certain calls, and a future patch is going to make use of
default-null block insertion locations.

All of this should be NFC.
2024-03-04 13:14:39 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
6c7805d5d1 Revert "[NFC][RemoveDIs] Bulk update utilities to insert with iterators"
This reverts commit 3fda50d3915b2163a54a37b602be7783a89dd808.

Apparently I've missed a hunk while staging this; will back out for now.

Picked up here: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/60429/steps/6/logs/stdio
2024-02-29 16:50:22 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
3fda50d391 [NFC][RemoveDIs] Bulk update utilities to insert with iterators
As part of the RemoveDIs project we need LLVM to insert instructions using
iterators wherever possible, so that the iterators can carry a bit of
debug-info. This commit implements some of that by updating the contents of
llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils to always use iterator-versions of instruction
constructors.

There are two general flavours of update:
 * Almost all call-sites just call getIterator on an instruction
 * Several make use of an existing iterator (scenarios where the code is
   actually significant for debug-info)
The underlying logic is that any call to getFirstInsertionPt or similar
APIs that identify the start of a block need to have that iterator passed
directly to the insertion function, without being converted to a bare
Instruction pointer along the way.

I've also switched DemotePHIToStack to take an optional iterator: it needs
to take an iterator, and having a no-insert-location behaviour appears to
be important. The constructors for ICmpInst and FCmpInst have been updated
too. They're the only instructions that take block _references_ rather than
pointers for certain calls, and a future patch is going to make use of
default-null block insertion locations.

All of this should be NFC.
2024-02-29 16:39:09 +00:00
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
8a16422020
[RemoveDIs] Add DPLabels support [3a/3] (#82633)
Patch 2 of 3 to add llvm.dbg.label support to the RemoveDIs project. The
patch stack adds the DPLabel class, which is the RemoveDIs llvm.dbg.label
equivalent.

   1. Add DbgRecord base class for DPValue and the not-yet-added
       DPLabel class.
   2. Add the DPLabel class.
-> 3. Add support to passes.

The next patch, #82639, will enable conversion between dbg.labels and DPLabels.

AssignemntTrackingAnalysis support could have gone two ways:

1. Have the analysis store a DPLabel representation in its results -
   SelectionDAGBuilder reads the analysis results and ignores all DbgRecord
   kinds.
2. Ignore DPLabels in the analysis - SelectionDAGBuilder reads the analysis
   results but still needs to iterate over DPLabels from the IR.

I went with option 2 because it's less work and is no less correct than 1. It's
worth noting that causes labels to sink to the bottom of packs of debug records.
e.g., [value, label, value] becomes [value, value, label]. This shouldn't be a
problem because labels and variable locations don't have an ordering requirement.
The ordering between variable locations is maintained and the label movement is
deterministic
2024-02-23 11:37:21 +00:00
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
ababa96475
[RemoveDIs][NFC] Introduce DbgRecord base class [1/3] (#78252)
Patch 1 of 3 to add llvm.dbg.label support to the RemoveDIs project. The
patch stack adds a new base class

    -> 1. Add DbgRecord base class for DPValue and the not-yet-added
          DPLabel class.
       2. Add the DPLabel class.
       3. Enable dbg.label conversion and add support to passes.

Patches 1 and 2 are NFC.

In the near future we also will rename DPValue to DbgVariableRecord and
DPLabel to DbgLabelRecord, at which point we'll overhaul the function
names too. The name DPLabel keeps things consistent for now.
2024-02-20 16:00:55 +00:00
Stephen Tozer
89aa3355e2
[RemoveDIs][DebugInfo] Remove redundant DPVAssigns (#78574)
DPValues are already supported by most of the utilities that remove
redundant debug info after certain passes; the exception to this is
`removeUndefDbgAssignsFromEntryBlock`, which applies only to
llvm.dbg.assigns which were previously unimplemented for DPValues. Now
that DPVAssigns exist, we have to support removing redundant instances
in the same way, which this patch implements.
2024-01-22 18:04:07 +00:00
David Green
7850c94b86 [NFC] sentinal -> sentinel 2024-01-16 17:22:06 +00:00
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
300ac0aa85
[RemoveDIs] Fix removeRedundantDdbgInstrs utils for dbg.declares (#74102)
The intrinsic variants of these functions don't do anything to
dbg.declares so the non-instruction variants should ignore them too.

Tested in llvm/test/DebugInfo/duplicate_dbgvalue.ll, which has
`--try-experimental-debuginfo-iterators` added in #73504.

The tests will become "live" once #74090 lands (see for more info).
2023-12-12 14:53:27 +00:00
Joshua Cao
bd382032f6
[BBUtils][NFC] Delete SplitLandingPadPredecessors with DT (#73406)
Function is marked for deprecation. There is only one consumer which is
converted to use DomTreeUpdater.
2023-12-02 11:33:43 -08:00