Similar to 806761a7629df268c8aed49657aeccffa6bca449.
For IR files without a target triple, -mtriple= specifies the full
target triple while -march= merely sets the architecture part of the
default target triple, leaving a target triple which may not make sense,
e.g. amdgpu-apple-darwin.
Therefore, -march= is error-prone and not recommended for tests without
a target triple. The issue has been benign as we recognize
$unknown-apple-darwin as ELF instead of rejecting it outrightly.
This patch changes AMDGPU tests to not rely on the default
OS/environment components. Tests that need fixes are not changed:
```
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/floor.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.f64.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/r600-infinite-loop-bug-while-reorganizing-vector.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/schedule-if-2.ll
```
This is already deprecated, so remove code working on this.
Also update the tests by using S_CBRANCH_EXECZ instead of SI_MASK_BRANCH.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97545
Current tail duplication integrated in bb layout is designed to increase the fallthrough from a BB's predecessor to its successor, but we have observed cases that duplication doesn't increase fallthrough, or it brings too much size overhead.
To overcome these two issues in function canTailDuplicateUnplacedPreds I add two checks:
make sure there is at least one duplication in current work set.
the number of duplication should not exceed the number of successors.
The modification in hasBetterLayoutPredecessor fixes a bug that potential predecessor must be at the bottom of a chain.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64376
According to the documentation method returns predecessor
if the given loop's header has exactly one unique predecessor
outside the loop. Otherwise return null.
In reality it asserts if there is no predecessor outside of
the loop.
The testcase has the loop where predecessors outside of the
loop were not identified as analyzeBranch() was unable to
process the mask branch and returned true. That is also not
correct to assert for the truly dead loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67634
llvm-svn: 372405
