that has been explicitly specialized!
We assume in various places that we can tell the template specialization kind
of a class type by looking at the declaration produced by TagType::getDecl.
That was previously not quite true: for an explicit specialization, we could
have first seen a template-id denoting the specialization (with a use that does
not trigger an implicit instantiation of the defintiion) and then seen the
first explicit specialization declaration. TagType::getDecl would previously
return an arbitrary declaration when called on a not-yet-defined class; it
now consistently returns the most recent declaration in that case.
llvm-svn: 295118
that looks like it might be an explicit specialization, don't recover as an
explicit specialization (bypassing the check that would reject that).
llvm-svn: 206444
is specialized by an explicit specialization, start from the first declaration
in case we've got a member of a class template (redeclarations might not number
the template parameters the same way).
Our recover here is still far from ideal.
llvm-svn: 197305
in the order they occur within the class template, delaying
out-of-line member template partial specializations until after the
class has been fully instantiated. This fixes a regression introduced
by r118454 (itself a fix for PR8001).
llvm-svn: 118704
propagating error conditions out of the various annotate-me-a-snowflake
routines. Generally (but not universally) removes redundant diagnostics
as well as, you know, not crashing on bad code. On the other hand,
I have just signed myself up to fix fiddly parser errors for the next
week. Again.
llvm-svn: 97221
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
