Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921.
The original commit cf5a8b4 was reverted by 2e5035a due to some
failures (see #83774).
Fixes#60061
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921.
Fixes#60061
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
Reviewed By: rnk, aaron.ballman, #libc, ldionne, Mordante, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921
Closing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57339
The root cause for this issue is an pre-mature optimization to eliminate
the index for the final suspend point since we feel like we can judge
if a coroutine is suspended at the final suspend by if resume_fn_addr is
null. However this is not true if the coroutine exists via an exception
in promise.unhandled_exception(). According to
[dcl.fct.def.coroutine]p14:
> If the evaluation of the expression promise.unhandled_exception()
> exits via an exception, the coroutine is considered suspended at the
> final suspend point.
But from the perspective of the implementation, we can't set the coro
index to the final suspend point directly since it breaks the states.
To fix the issue, we block the optimization if we find there is any
unwind coro end, which indicates that it is possible that the coroutine
exists via an exception from promise.unhandled_exception().
Test Plan: folly
Closing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56919
It is meaningless to preserve the lifetime markers for the spilled
allocas in the coroutine frames and it would block some optimizations
too.
