16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikolas Klauser
01df775dc4
[libc++] Take the ABI break for std::list's pointer UB unconditionally (#100585)
This ABI break only affects fancy pointer which have a different value
representation when pointing to a base of T instead of T itself. This
seems like a rather small set of fancy pointers, which themselves
already represent a very small niche. This patch swaps a pointer to T
with a pointer to base of T in a few library-internal types.
2024-09-16 11:55:33 -04:00
A. Jiang
94e7c0b051
[libc++] Remove get_temporary_buffer and return_temporary_buffer (#100914)
Works towards P0619R4 / #99985.

The use of `std::get_temporary_buffer` and `std::return_temporary_buffer`
are replaced with `unique_ptr`-based RAII buffer holder.

Escape hatches:
- `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_TEMPORARY_BUFFER` restores
`std::get_temporary_buffer` and `std::return_temporary_buffer`.

Drive-by changes:
- In `<syncstream>`, states that `get_temporary_buffer` is now removed,
because `<syncstream>` is added in C++20.
2024-09-16 11:53:05 -04:00
Nikolas Klauser
27c83382d8
[libc++] Replace __compressed_pair with [[no_unique_address]] (#76756)
This significantly simplifies the code, improves compile times and
improves the object layout of types using `__compressed_pair` in the
unstable ABI. The only downside is that this is extremely ABI sensitive
and pedantically breaks the ABI for empty final types, since the address
of the subobject may change. The ABI of the whole object should not be
affected.

Fixes #91266
Fixes #93069
2024-09-16 11:08:57 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
2fb133f32a [libc++][NFC] Reflow release notes
There are a few lines in the release notes which are much wider than the
120 columns we usually use. This reflows the text to keep it below the
threshold.
2024-09-13 11:37:50 +02:00
Louis Dionne
99174842ae
[libc++] Make std::jthread supported in non-experimental mode (#107900)
We waited before supporting std::jthread fully because we wanted to
investigate other implementation strategies (in particular one involving
std::mutex). Since then, we did some benchmarking and decided that we
wouldn't be moving forward with std::mutex. Hence, there is no real
reason to punt on making std::jthread & friends non-experimental.
2024-09-12 09:48:59 -04:00
A. Jiang
7808541fde
[libc++] P2747R2: constexpr placement new (library part) (#105768)
This patch implements https://wg21.link/P2747R2.

The library changes affect direct `operator new` and `operator new[]`
calls even when the core language changes are absent.

The changes are not available for MS ABI because the `operator new` and
`operator new[]` are from VCRuntime's `<vcruntime_new.h>`. A feature
request was submitted for that [1].

As a drive-by change, the patch reformatted the whole `new.pass.cpp` and
`new_array.pass.cpp` tests.

Closes #105427

[1]: https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/constexpr-for-placement-operator-newope/10730304.
2024-08-28 09:35:57 -04:00
A. Jiang
026210e80d
[libc++][ranges] P2609R3: Relaxing Ranges Just A Smidge (#101715)
This patch implements https://wg21.link/p2609r3.
The test code was originally authored by JMazurkiewicz.

Notes:
- P2609R3 is not officially a Defect Report, but MSVC STL
  implements it in C++20 mode.

  Moreover, P2609R3 and P2997R1 touch exactly the same set of
  concepts, and MSVC STL and libc++ have already treated P2997R1
  as a DR.

- This patch also adjusted feature-test macros.
  + In C++20 mode, the value of __cpp_lib_ranges should be `202110L` because
    - `202202L` covers `range_adaptor_closure` (P2387R3), and
    - `202207L` covers move-only types in range adaptors (P2494R2).
  And all of these changes are only available since C++23 mode.

  + In C++23 mode, the value should be `202406L` because
    - `202211L` covers removing poison overloads (P2602R2),
    - `202302L` covers relaxing projected value types (P2609R3), and
    - `202406L` covers removing requirements on `iter_common_reference_t` (P2997R1).
  And all of these changes are already or being implemented.

Fixes #105253.

Co-authored-by: Jakub Mazurkiewicz <mazkuba3@gmail.com>
2024-08-28 08:55:44 -04:00
A. Jiang
4ea2c73886
[libc++] Deprecate and remove std::uncaught_exception (#101830)
Works towards P0619R4/#99985.

- std::uncaught_exception was not previously deprecated. This patch
  deprecates it since C++17 as per N4259. std::uncaught_exceptions is
  used instead as libc++ unconditionally provides this function.

- _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION restores
  std::uncaught_exception.

- As a drive-by, this patch updates the C++20 status page to 
  explain that D.11 is already done, since it was done in 
  578d09c1b195d859ca7e62840ff6bb83421a77b5.
2024-08-27 17:15:03 -04:00
Louis Dionne
1c48c9cc43
[libc++] Implement P2985R0: std::is_virtual_base_of (#105847)
This trait is implemented in C++26 conditionally on the compiler
supporting the __builtin_is_virtual_base_of intrinsic. I believe only
tip-of-trunk Clang currently implements that builtin.

Closes #105432
2024-08-26 09:58:19 -04:00
Nikolas Klauser
85da39debd
[libc++] Remove the allocator<const T> extension (#102655)
In LLVM 19 removed the extension with an opt-in macro. This finally
removes that option too and removes a few `const_cast`s where I know
that they exist only to support this extension.
2024-08-15 20:45:49 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
d07fdf9779
[libc++] Optimize lexicographical_compare (#65279)
If the comparison operation is equivalent to < and that is a total
order, we know that we can use equality comparison on that type instead
to extract some information. Furthermore, if equality comparison on that
type is trivial, the user can't observe that we're calling it. So
instead of using the user-provided total order, we use std::mismatch,
which uses equality comparison (and is vertorized). Additionally, if the
type is trivially lexicographically comparable, we can go one step
further and use std::memcmp directly instead of calling std::mismatch.

Benchmarks:
```
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                                                         old             new
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/1                   1.17 ns         2.34 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/2                   1.64 ns         2.57 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/3                   2.23 ns         2.58 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/4                   2.82 ns         2.57 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/5                   3.34 ns         2.11 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/6                   3.94 ns         2.21 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/7                   4.56 ns         2.11 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/8                   5.25 ns         2.11 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/16                  9.88 ns         2.11 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/64                  38.9 ns         2.36 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/512                  317 ns         6.54 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/4096                2517 ns         41.4 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/32768              20052 ns          488 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/262144            159579 ns         4409 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/1048576           640456 ns        20342 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/1                     1.18 ns         2.37 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/2                     1.65 ns         2.60 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/3                     2.23 ns         2.83 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/4                     2.81 ns         3.06 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/5                     3.35 ns         3.30 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/6                     3.90 ns         3.99 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/7                     4.56 ns         3.78 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/8                     5.20 ns         4.02 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/16                    9.80 ns         6.21 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/64                    39.0 ns         3.16 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/512                    318 ns         7.58 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/4096                  2514 ns         47.4 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/32768                20096 ns          504 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/262144              156617 ns         4146 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/1048576             624265 ns        19810 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/1                             1.15 ns         2.12 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/2                             1.60 ns         2.36 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/3                             2.21 ns         2.59 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/4                             2.74 ns         2.83 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/5                             3.26 ns         3.06 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/6                             3.81 ns         4.53 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/7                             4.41 ns         4.72 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/8                             5.08 ns         2.36 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/16                            9.54 ns         3.08 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/64                            37.8 ns         4.71 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/512                            309 ns         24.6 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/4096                          2422 ns          204 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/32768                        19362 ns         1947 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/262144                      155727 ns        19793 ns
bm_lexicographical_compare<int>/1048576                     623614 ns        80180 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/1            1.07 ns         2.35 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/2            1.72 ns         2.13 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/3            2.46 ns         2.12 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/4            3.17 ns         2.12 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/5            3.86 ns         2.12 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/6            4.55 ns         2.12 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/7            5.25 ns         2.12 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/8            5.95 ns         2.13 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/16           11.7 ns         2.13 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/64           45.5 ns         2.36 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/512           366 ns         6.35 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/4096         2886 ns         40.9 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/32768       23054 ns          489 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/262144     185302 ns         4339 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<unsigned char>/1048576    741576 ns        19430 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/1              1.10 ns         2.12 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/2              1.66 ns         2.35 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/3              2.23 ns         2.58 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/4              2.82 ns         2.82 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/5              3.34 ns         3.06 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/6              3.92 ns         3.99 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/7              4.64 ns         4.10 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/8              5.21 ns         4.61 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/16             9.79 ns         7.42 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/64             38.9 ns         2.93 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/512             317 ns         7.31 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/4096           2500 ns         47.5 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/32768         19940 ns          496 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/262144       159166 ns         4393 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<signed char>/1048576      638206 ns        19786 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/1                      1.10 ns         2.12 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/2                      1.64 ns         3.04 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/3                      2.23 ns         2.58 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/4                      2.81 ns         2.81 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/5                      3.35 ns         3.05 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/6                      3.94 ns         4.60 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/7                      4.60 ns         4.81 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/8                      5.19 ns         2.35 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/16                     9.85 ns         2.87 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/64                     38.9 ns         4.70 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/512                     318 ns         24.5 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/4096                   2494 ns          202 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/32768                 20000 ns         1939 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/262144               160433 ns        19730 ns
bm_ranges_lexicographical_compare<int>/1048576              642636 ns        80760 ns
```
2024-08-04 10:02:43 +02:00
Louis Dionne
bf1666fb0b
[libc++] Drop support for the C++20 Synchronization Library before C++20 (#82008)
When we initially implemented the C++20 synchronization library, we
reluctantly accepted for the implementation to be backported to C++03
upon request from the person who provided the patch. This was when we
were only starting to have experience with the issues this can create,
so we flinched. Nowadays, we have a much stricter stance about not
backporting features to previous standards.

We have recently started fixing several bugs (and near bugs) in our
implementation of the synchronization library. A recurring theme during
these reviews has been how difficult to understand the current code is,
and upon inspection it becomes clear that being able to use a few recent
C++ features (in particular lambdas) would help a great deal. The code
would still be pretty intricate, but it would be a lot easier to reason
about the flow of callbacks through things like
__thread_poll_with_backoff.

As a result, this patch drops support for the synchronization library
before C++20. This makes us more strictly conforming and opens the door
to major simplifications, in particular around atomic_wait which was
supported all the way to C++03.

This change will probably have some impact on downstream users, however
since the C++20 synchronization library was added only in LLVM 10 (~3
years ago) and it's quite a niche feature, the set of people trying to
use this part of the library before C++20 should be reasonably small.
2024-07-31 17:53:09 -04:00
Mark de Wever
e9bb4e303b
[libc++][doc] Update the release notes for LLVM 19. (#99061)
This is a preparation for the upcoming LLVM 19 release.
2024-07-23 18:59:23 +02:00
A. Jiang
684a61506a
[libc++][chrono] Remove non-standard relational operators for std::chrono::weekday (#98730)
These operators are absent in https://eel.is/c++draft/time.syn and a note in
https://eel.is/c++draft/time.cal.wd.overview#1 indicates that the absence is 
intended.

This patch removes the undocumented extension, while providing a migration path
for vendors by providing the `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_REMOVED_WEEKDAY_RELATIONAL_OPERATORS`
macro. This macro will be honored for the LLVM 19 release and will be removed after 
that, at which point allocator will be removed unconditionally.
2024-07-18 09:58:35 -04:00
Louis Dionne
45bc85603a [libc++][NFC] Add missing upcoming removal to 19 release notes
This upcoming removal was recorded in the release notes for LLVM 19
as part of the deprecation of the C++20 synchronization library in
pre-C++20 modes, but wasn't included in "Upcoming Deprecations and Removals".
2024-07-10 14:10:30 -04:00
Louis Dionne
33af4bd7a4
[libc++] Add empty release notes file for LLVM 20 (#98355)
While we haven't branched yet, this will make it easier for folks to add
release notes for PRs that won't be merged before the LLVM 19 branch
point.
2024-07-10 14:08:27 -04:00