Header synospis sections of P1614R2 are implemented by other items usually. For completeness, let's mark some of them as "Complete".
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152775
Implements parts of P1614R2:
- Removed global `operator!=` from `allocator`
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152612
Depends on D146066
Depends on D132268
Implements parts of P1614R2 `operator<=>` for `stack`
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146094
Implements part of P1614R2 "The Mothership has Landed"
Depends on D150188
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132268
Clang has been updated to support C++26, this adds the same support for
libc++. At the moment C++23 and C++26 are identical. During the next
plenary in June the first C++26 papers will be voted on.
Note like Clang this patch uses C++26 is the internal part and C++2c in
the user visible part.
Depends on D150795
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151026
During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.
This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.
Note since we use clang-tidy 16 a small work-around is needed. Clang
knows -std=c++23 but clang-tidy not so for now force the lit compiler
flag to use -std=c++2b instead of -std=c++23.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, jloser, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150795
The main change is to allow a UCS scalar value as fill character.
Especially for char based formatting this increase the number of valid
characters. Originally this was to be expected ABI breaking, however the
current change does not seem to break the ABI.
Implements
- P2572 std::format() fill character allowances
Depends on D144499
Reviewed By: ldionne, tahonermann, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144742
This reverts commit ebc111b08bddca55d5f7e560a20bdb2c913d80cb.
Sorry, I forgot to append Phabricator reversion when land D140911, I try to revert this change and reland.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150793
This patch adds std::extents. extents is one of the core classes used by std::mdspan. It describes a multi-dimensional index space with a mix of compile time and runtime sizes. Furthermore, it is templated on the index type used to describe the multi-dimensional index space.
The class is designed to be highly optimizable in performance critical code sections, and is fully useable in constant expressions contexts.
Testing of this class tends to be somewhat combinatorical, due to the large number of possible corner cases involved in situations where we have both runtime and compile time extents. To add to this, the class is designed to be interoperable (in particular constructible) from arguments which only need to be convertible to the index_type, but are otherwise arbitrary user types. For a larger discussion on the design of this class refer to: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p0009r18.html
Co-authored-by: Damien L-G <dalg24@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, H-G-Hristov, tschuett, philnik, arichardson, Mordante, crtrott
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148067
- add the `from_range_t` constructors and the related deduction guides;
- add the `insert_range`/`assign_range`/etc. member functions.
(Note: this patch is split from https://reviews.llvm.org/D142335)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149826
LWG3759 ranges::rotate_copy should use std::move
This has been one in the initial version (D127211).
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142813
The removal of operator!= in this header will be done in a separate
commit.
Note in the synopsis of P1614R2 there is a constexpr
template<class BiIter>
constexpr auto operator<=>(const sub_match<BiIter>& lhs, const sub_match<BiIter>& rhs);
In the implementation of P1614R2 there isn't a constexpr
template<class BiIter>
auto operator<=>(const sub_match<BiIter>& lhs, const sub_match<BiIter>& rhs);
There doesn't seem to be an LWG-issue, but it was fixed in the Standard
by removing the constexpr in b050fd474f11441942c88ef69b8622c8036656ac.
Implements part of:
- P1614R2 The Mothership has Landed
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132310
As obvious from the paper's title this is an LWG issue and thus retroactively
applied to C++20. This change may the output for certain code points:
1 Considers 8477 extra codepoints as having a width 2 (as of Unicode 15)
(mostly Tangut Ideographs)
2 Change the width of 85 unassigned code points from 2 to 1
3 Change the width of 8 codepoints (in the range U+3248 CIRCLED NUMBER
TEN ON BLACK SQUARE ... U+324F CIRCLED NUMBER EIGHTY ON BLACK
SQUARE) from 2 to 1, because it seems questionable to make an exception
for those without input from Unicode
Note that libc++ already uses Unicode 15, while the Standard requires Unicode 12.
(The last time I checked MSVC STL used Unicode 14.)
So in practice the only notable change is item 3.
Implements
P2675 LWG3780: The Paper
format's width estimation is too approximate and not forward compatible
Benchmark before these changes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_ascii_text<char> 3928 ns 3928 ns 178131
BM_unicode_text<char> 75231 ns 75230 ns 9158
BM_cyrillic_text<char> 59837 ns 59834 ns 11529
BM_japanese_text<char> 39842 ns 39832 ns 17501
BM_emoji_text<char> 3931 ns 3930 ns 177750
BM_ascii_text<wchar_t> 4024 ns 4024 ns 174190
BM_unicode_text<wchar_t> 63756 ns 63751 ns 11136
BM_cyrillic_text<wchar_t> 44639 ns 44638 ns 15597
BM_japanese_text<wchar_t> 34425 ns 34424 ns 20283
BM_emoji_text<wchar_t> 3937 ns 3937 ns 177684
Benchmark after these changes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_ascii_text<char> 3914 ns 3913 ns 178814
BM_unicode_text<char> 70380 ns 70378 ns 9694
BM_cyrillic_text<char> 51889 ns 51877 ns 13488
BM_japanese_text<char> 41707 ns 41705 ns 16723
BM_emoji_text<char> 3908 ns 3907 ns 177912
BM_ascii_text<wchar_t> 3949 ns 3948 ns 177525
BM_unicode_text<wchar_t> 64591 ns 64587 ns 10649
BM_cyrillic_text<wchar_t> 44089 ns 44078 ns 15721
BM_japanese_text<wchar_t> 39369 ns 39367 ns 17779
BM_emoji_text<wchar_t> 3936 ns 3934 ns 177821
Benchmarks without "if(__code_point < (__entries[0] >> 14))"
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_ascii_text<char> 3922 ns 3922 ns 178587
BM_unicode_text<char> 94474 ns 94474 ns 7351
BM_cyrillic_text<char> 69202 ns 69200 ns 10157
BM_japanese_text<char> 42735 ns 42692 ns 16382
BM_emoji_text<char> 3920 ns 3919 ns 178704
BM_ascii_text<wchar_t> 3951 ns 3950 ns 177224
BM_unicode_text<wchar_t> 81003 ns 80988 ns 8668
BM_cyrillic_text<wchar_t> 57020 ns 57018 ns 12048
BM_japanese_text<wchar_t> 39695 ns 39687 ns 17582
BM_emoji_text<wchar_t> 3977 ns 3976 ns 176479
This optimization does carry its weight for the Unicode and Cyrillic
test. For the Japanese tests the gains are minor and for emoji it seems
to have no effect.
Reviewed By: ldionne, tahonermann, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144499
The __cpp_lib_format_ranges feature-test macro only depends on P2286R8
and P2585R0. Note since LWG3750 only affects these two C++23 papers
there is nothing to do for older language versions.
(The __cpp_lib_format feature-test macro depends on the incomplete
formatting for chrono. So this part can't be marked as complete yet.)
This completes
- P2286R8 Formatting ranges
- P2585R0 Improving default container formatting
This partly implements
- LWG3750 Too many papers bump __cpp_lib_format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147880
LWG3720 Restrict the valid types of arg-id for width and precision in
std-format-spec
Depends on D144325
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144326
Since stacktrace header is WIP and it's not sure that will be done
before LLVM17 update the documentation. When the header is implemented
implementing the formatter is trivial, so that can be done quickly
afterwards.
Implements parts of:
- P2693R1 Formatting thread::id and stacktrace
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144331
This LWG issue is based on the discussion regarding
P2733R3 Fix handling of empty specifiers in std::format
This paper was disussed and changed a few times in LEWG during the
Issaquah meeting. The paper was not voted in, instead LEWG asked for
a DR against C++26.
This LWG issue contains the direction voted by LEWG. This issue has not
been voted in yet. However it fixes some of the defencies on the
container based formatting. Without this fix the range-default-formatter
for strings looks bad when used in containers.
The changes of this issue match the intended changes of P27333.
type fmt before after (if changed)
---------------------------------------------------------------
char {} a
char {:?} 'a'
array<char, 1> {} ['a']
array<char, 1> {::} [a]
array<char, 1> {::c} [a]
array<char, 1> {::?} ['a']
map<char, char> {} {a: a} -> {'a': 'a'}
map<char, char> {::} {'a': 'a'}
set<char> {} {'a'}
set<char> {::} {a}
set<char> {::c} {a}
set<char> {::?} {'a'}
tuple<char> {} ('a')
stack<char> {} ['a']
stack<char> {::} [a]
stack<char> {::c} [a]
stack<char> {::?} ['a']
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {} [[a]] -> {'a': 'a'}
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {::} [['a']]
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::} [[a]]
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::c} [[a]]
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::?} [['a']]
array<tuple<char>, 1> {} [(a)] -> [('a')]
tuple<tuple<char>> {} ((a)) -> (('a'))
tuple<array<char, 1>> {} ([a]) -> (['a'])
Note the optimization text as mentioned in the tuple formatter can't be
done. The call to parse may affect the formatter so its state needs to
be preserved.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145847
LWG3842 Unclear wording for precision in chrono-format-spec
Note there is nothing to do, the issue clarifies the wording in the Standard.
The new wording matches my interpretation of the previous wording and this has
already been implemented in libc++.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144328
