This re-formats a few headers that had become out-of-sync with respect
to formatting since we ran clang-format on the whole codebase. There's
surprisingly few instances of it.
This adds the new std::enable_nonlocking_formatter_optimization trait in
<format>. This trait will be used in std::print to implement the
performance benefits.
Implements parts of
- P3107R5 - Permit an efficient implementation of ``std::print``
This paper was voted in as a DR, so it's retroactively enabled back to
C++20; the C++ version that introduced std::format.
Implements:
- P2909R4 Fix formatting of code units as integers (Dude, where’s my
``char``?)
After parsing a std-format-spec it's validated, depending on the type used some
format options are not allowed. This improves the error messages in the
exceptions thrown upon failure.
Depends on D155364
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155366
This should reduce the size of the transitive includes for the vector header.
Note the header still quite large so the difference may be small.
Depends on D154122
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154286
The newer formatters for (tuple, vector<bool>::reference) specify the
formatter's parse and format member function. This signature is slightly
different from the signature for existing formatters. Adapt the existing
formatters to the new style.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150034
std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no
deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required
for it are in `libc++experimental.a`).
However, some parts of std::format depend indirectly on the floating
point std::to_chars implementation, which does have deployment target
requirements.
This patch removes all the availability format for std::format and
updates the XFAILs in the tests to properly explain why they fail
on old deployment targets, when they do. It also changes a couple
of tests to avoid depending on floating-point std::to_chars when
it isn't fundamental to the test.
Finally, some tests are marked as XFAIL but I added a comment saying
TODO FMT This test should not require std::to_chars(floating-point)
These tests do not fundamentally depend on floating-point std::to_chars,
however they end up failing because calling std::format even without a
floating-point argument to format will end up requiring floating-point
std::to_chars. I believe this is an implementation artifact that could
be avoided in all cases where we know the format string at compile-time.
In the tests, I added the TODO comment only to the places where we could
do better and actually avoid relying on floating-point std::to_chars
because we know the format string at compile-time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134598
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
Move the concept to the concepts header and uses a name in the style of
P2286.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131176
A format string like "{}" is quite common. In this case avoid parsing
the format-spec when it's not present. Before the parsing was always
called, therefore some refactoring is done to make sure the formatters
work properly when their parse member isn't called.
From the wording it's not entirely clear whether this optimization is
allowed
[tab:formatter]
```
and the range [pc.begin(), pc.end()) from the last call to f.parse(pc).
```
Implies there's always a call to `f.parse` even when the format-spec
isn't present. Therefore this optimization isn't done for handle
classes; it's unclear whether that would break user defined formatters.
The improvements give a small reduciton is code size:
719408 12472 488 732368 b2cd0 before
718824 12472 488 731784 b2a88 after
The performance benefits when not using a format-spec are:
```
Comparing ./formatter_int.libcxx.out-baseline to ./formatter_int.libcxx.out
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_Basic<uint32_t> -0.0688 -0.0687 67 62 67 62
BM_Basic<int32_t> -0.1105 -0.1107 73 65 73 65
BM_Basic<uint64_t> -0.1053 -0.1049 95 85 95 85
BM_Basic<int64_t> -0.0889 -0.0888 93 85 93 85
BM_BasicLow<__uint128_t> -0.0655 -0.0655 96 90 96 90
BM_BasicLow<__int128_t> -0.0693 -0.0694 97 90 97 90
BM_Basic<__uint128_t> -0.0359 -0.0359 256 247 256 247
BM_Basic<__int128_t> -0.0414 -0.0414 239 229 239 229
```
For the cases where a format-spec is used the results remain similar,
some are faster some are slower, differing per run.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129426
This changes the implementation of the formatter. Instead of inheriting
from a specialized parser all formatters will use the same generic
parser. This reduces the binary size.
The new parser contains some additional fields only used in the chrono
formatting. Since this doesn't change the size of the parser the fields
are in the generic parser. The parser is designed to fit in 128-bit,
making it cheap to pass by value.
The new format function is a const member function. This isn't required
by the Standard yet, but it will be after LWG-3636 is accepted.
Additionally P2286 adds a formattable concept which requires the member
function to be const qualified in C++23. This paper is likely to be
accepted in the 2022 July plenary.
This is based on D125606. That commit did the groundwork and did similar
changes for the string formatters.
Depends on D125606
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128139
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
Implements the formatter for all fundamental integer types.
[format.formatter.spec]/2.1
The specializations
```
template<> struct formatter<char, char>;
template<> struct formatter<char, wchar_t>;
template<> struct formatter<wchar_t, wchar_t>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103466
