We recently noticed that the unwrap_iter.h file was pushing macros, but
it was pushing them again instead of popping them at the end of the
file. This led to libc++ basically swallowing any custom definition of
these macros in user code:
#define min HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// min is not HELLO anymore, it's not defined
While investigating this issue, I noticed that our push/pop pragmas were
actually entirely wrong too. Indeed, instead of pushing macros like
`move`, we'd push `move(int, int)` in the pragma, which is not a valid
macro name. As a result, we would not actually push macros like `move`
-- instead we'd simply undefine them. This led to the following code not
working:
#define move HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// move is not HELLO anymore
Fixing the pragma push/pop incantations led to a cascade of issues
because we use identifiers like `move` in a large number of places, and
all of these headers would now need to do the push/pop dance.
This patch fixes all these issues. First, it adds a check that we don't
swallow important names like min, max, move or refresh as explained
above. This is done by augmenting the existing
system_reserved_names.gen.py test to also check that the macros are what
we expect after including each header.
Second, it fixes the push/pop pragmas to work properly and adds missing
pragmas to all the files I could detect a failure in via the newly added
test.
rdar://121365472
The tag name was long for an ABI tag. The name was misleading too, the
tag is first introduced in LLVM 18 in 2024 and not in 2023.
---------
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
Also introduce `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC` for assertions violating which
results in a no-op or other benign behavior, but which may nevertheless
indicate a bug in the invoking code.
fixes#70506
The detailed problem description is in #70506
The original proposed fix was to remove `[[no_unique_address]]` except
when `_Tp` is empty.
Edit:
After the discussion in the comments below, the new fix here is to
remove the `[[no_unique_address]]` from `movable_box` in the cases where
we need to add our own assignment operator, which has contains the
problematic `construct_at`
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
Implement P2494R2 `Relaxing range adaptors to allow for move only types`
https://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2494r2.html#wording-ftm
According to the words in P2494R2, I haven't add new test for `drop_while_view`, `take_while_view` and `filter_view`, because these views has the requirement that the predicate is an `indirect_unary_predicate`, which requires that the predicate is `copy_constructible`, so they still can't accept move only types as predicate.
```
[P2483R0] also suggests future work to relax the requirements on the predicate types stored by standard views. This paper does not perform this relaxation, as the copy constructibility requirement is enshrined in the indirect callable concepts ([indirectcallable.indirectinvocable]). Thus, while this paper modifies the views that currently use copyable-box for user provided predicates, it only does so to apply the rename of the exposition-only type to movable-box; it does not change any of the constraints on those views. It does, however, relax the requirements on invocables accepted by the transform family of views, because those are not constrained using the indirect callable concepts.
```
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151629
