Reapply "[NFC][DebugInfo][DWARF] Create new low-level dwarf library (#…
(#145959)
This reapplies cbf781f0bdf2f680abbe784faedeefd6f84c246e, with fixes for
the shared-library build and the unconventional sanitizer-runtime build.
Original Description:
This is the culmination of a series of changes described in [1].
Although somewhat large by line count, it is almost entirely mechanical,
creating a new library in DebugInfo/DWARF/LowLevel. This new library has
very minimal dependencies, allowing it to be used from more places than
the normal DebugInfo/DWARF library--in particular from MC.
1.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-debuginfo-dwarf-refactor-into-to-lower-and-higher-level-libraries/86665/2
This is the culmination of a series of changes described in [1].
Although somewhat large by line count, it is almost entirely mechanical,
creating a new library in DebugInfo/DWARF/LowLevel. This new library has
very minimal dependencies, allowing it to be used from more places than
the normal DebugInfo/DWARF library--in particular from MC.
I am happy to put it in another location, or to structure it differently
if that makes sense. Some have suggested in BinaryFormat, but it is not
a great fit there. But if that makes more sense to the reviewers, I can
do that.
Another possibility would be to use pass-through headers to allow
clients who don't care to depend only on DebugInfo/DWARF. This would be
a much less invasive change, and perhaps easier for clients. But also a
system that hides details.
Either way, I'm open.
1.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-debuginfo-dwarf-refactor-into-to-lower-and-higher-level-libraries/86665/2
Added support to BOLT for DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address. So now
DW_TAG_variable with this OP in DW_AT_location will appear in debug
names acceleration table. Although not in the DWARF 5 spec it is similar
to DW_OP_form_tls_address. Without this support llvm-dwarfdump --verify
--debug-names will report errors.
This fix handles a case where a DIE that does not have
DW_AT_name/DW_AT_linkage_name, but has a reference to another DIE using
DW_AT_abstract_origin/DW_AT_specification. It also fixes a bug where
there are cross CU references for those attributes. Previously it would
use a DWARF Unit of a DIE which was being processed The
warf5-debug-names-cross-cu.s test just happened to work because how it
was constructed where string section was shared by both DWARF Units.
To resolve DW_AT_name/DW_AT_linkage_name this patch iterates over
references until it either reaches the final DIE or finds both of those
names.
There could be multiple TUs with the same hash in various DWO files. In
bigger binaries this could be in the thousands. Although they could be
structurally different and we need to output Entries for all of them,
for the purposes of figuring out a TU hash we only need one entry in
Foreign TU list.
Previously when an entry was skipped in parent chain a child will point
to the next valid entry in the chain. After discussion in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91808 this is not very useful.
Changed implemenation so that all the children of the entry that is
skipped won't have DW_IDX_parent.
The DW_AT_abstract_origin can be a cross-cu reference as a by-product of
LTO. On IR level for absolute references an address is stored, vs a DIE
for relative references. Added a map to keep track of cross-cu
referenced DIEs to use when we add an Entry.
According to the DWARF spec a DIE that has DW_AT_specification or
DW_AT_abstract_origin can be part of .debug_name if a DIE those
attribute points to has DW_AT_name or DW_AT_linkage_name.
The foreign TU list immediately follows the local TU list and they both
use the same index, so that if there are N local TU entries, the index
for the first foreign TU is N.
Changed so that the size of local TU is accounted for when setting
foreign TU index.
DWARF5 spec supports the .debug_names acceleration table. This is the
formalized version of combination of gdb-index/pubnames/types. Added
implementation of it to BOLT. It supports both monolothic and split
dwarf, with and without Type Units. It does not include parent indices.
This will be in followup PR. Unlike LLVM output this will put all the
CUs and TUs into one Module.
