417 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kazu Hirata
6ad0788c33 [clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<.  I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 12:31:01 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
a1580d7b59 [clang] Add #include <optional> (NFC)
This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 11:07:21 -08:00
Alan Zhao
95a4c0c835 [clang] Reland parenthesized aggregate init patches
This commit relands the patches for implementing P0960R3 and P1975R0,
which describe initializing aggregates via a parenthesized list.

The relanded commits are:

* 40c52159d3ee - P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from
  a parenthesized list of values
* c77a91bb7ba7 - Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic
* 32d7aae04fdb - Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode

This patch also fixes a crash in the original implementation.
Previously, if the input tried to call an implicitly deleted copy or
move constructor of a union, we would then try to initialize the union
by initializing it's first element with a reference to a union. This
behavior is incorrect (we should fail to initialize) and if the type of
the first element has a constructor with a single template typename
parameter, then Clang will explode. This patch fixes that issue by
checking that constructor overload resolution did not result in a
deleted function before attempting parenthesized aggregate
initialization.

Additionally, this patch also includes D140159, which contains some
minor fixes made in response to code review comments in the original
implementation that were made after that patch was submitted.

Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>

Fixes #54040, Fixes #59675

Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141546
2023-01-12 09:58:15 -08:00
serge-sans-paille
a3c248db87
Move from llvm::makeArrayRef to ArrayRef deduction guides - clang/ part
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into
several parts as it touches a lot of files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141139
2023-01-09 12:15:24 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
ca61961380 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, rupprecht

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2023-01-08 10:35:26 +01:00
Alan Zhao
4e02ff2303 [clang] Revert parentesized aggregate initalization patches
This feature causes clang to crash when compiling Chrome - see
https://crbug.com/1405031 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59675

Revert "[clang] Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode."

This reverts commit 32d7aae04fdb58e65a952f281ff2f2c3f396d98f.

Revert "[clang] Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic"

This reverts commit c77a91bb7ba793ec3a6a5da3743ed55056291658.

Revert "[clang][C++20] P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from a parenthesized list of values"

This reverts commit 40c52159d3ee337dbed14e4c73b5616ea354c337.
2023-01-04 15:09:36 -08:00
Alan Zhao
40c52159d3 [clang][C++20] P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from a parenthesized list of values
This patch implements P0960R3, which allows initialization of aggregates
via parentheses.

As an example:

```
struct S { int i, j; };
S s1(1, 1);

int arr1[2](1, 2);
```

This patch also implements P1975R0, which fixes the wording of P0960R3
for single-argument parenthesized lists so that statements like the
following are allowed:

```
S s2(1);
S s3 = static_cast<S>(1);
S s4 = (S)1;

int (&&arr2)[] = static_cast<int[]>(1);
int (&&arr3)[2] = static_cast<int[2]>(1);
```

This patch was originally authored by @0x59616e and completed by
@ayzhao.

Fixes #54040, Fixes #54041

Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>

Full write up : https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-20-rfc-suggestion-desired-regarding-the-implementation-of-p0960r3/63744

Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129531
2022-12-14 07:54:15 -08:00
Krasimir Georgiev
339a7687e1 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit f1f1b60c7ba607e9ffe3bc012161d43ef95ac773.

Temporary revert, possibly triggers a new assertion failure on
QualType::getCommonPtr.
We're working on a reproducer, to follow-up on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554.
2022-12-14 09:10:22 +00:00
Corentin Jabot
f1f1b60c7b Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-12-13 09:57:05 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
be305674bf Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit c9a6713b4788f10b81202b70993068e475b392f7.

Causes crashes, see D136554.
2022-12-09 14:20:30 -08:00
Corentin Jabot
c9a6713b47 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-12-09 10:25:44 +01:00
Richard Smith
4a1ccfe8a3 When merging lambdas, keep track of the capture lists from each version.
Different versions of a lambda will in general refer to different
enclosing variable declarations, because we do not merge most
block-scope declarations, such as local variables. Keep track of all the
declarations that correspond to a lambda's capture fields so that we can
rewrite the name of any of those variables to the lambda capture,
regardless of which copy of the body of `operator()` we look at.
2022-12-08 11:37:00 -08:00
Corentin Jabot
49c86eab62 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This patch causes another link error,
reverting until I can investigate.

This reverts commit a96a6ed83230265f3eab09a94f0e9525d05f8a74.
2022-12-08 19:57:58 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
a96a6ed832 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-12-08 10:32:54 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
9221bedfd7 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit 26fa17ed2914bd80c066d36b325fd3104e45554c.
This reverts commit 4403c4f9e77e673a2771edfc7ab0ebb234e97485.

There is still an ODR issue causing linker errors, investigating.
2022-11-30 16:03:05 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
26fa17ed29 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-30 11:25:01 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
35a870c30a Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit 7acfe3629479c8489fc2d7f629994dc200be990c.
This reverts commit 5f87a892a7bed9cb0599573b9aaf387bc1df9c14.
This reverts commit 6875ac69279a3a02fab382a2c8d121558ecbfa91.
2022-11-04 22:10:50 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
7acfe36294 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-04 14:46:38 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
722a0efe31 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
Breaks the build on some platforms.

This reverts commit bf1e235695a7acdc3e868217e69d5b31ada06cb3.
2022-11-04 08:24:52 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
bf1e235695 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-04 07:58:57 +01:00
Matheus Izvekov
bcd9ba2b7e
[clang] Track the templated entity in type substitution.
This is a change to how we represent type subsitution in the AST.
Instead of only storing the replaced type, we track the templated
entity we are substituting, plus an index.
We modify MLTAL to track the templated entity at each level.

Otherwise, it's much more expensive to go from the template parameter back
to the templated entity, and not possible to do in some cases, as when
we instantiate outer templates, parameters might still reference the
original entity.

This also allows us to very cheaply lookup the templated entity we saw in
the naming context and find the corresponding argument it was replaced
from, such as for implementing template specialization resugaring.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858
2022-10-15 22:08:36 +02:00
Fangrui Song
3f18f7c007 [clang] LLVM_FALLTHROUGH => [[fallthrough]]. NFC
With C++17 there is no Clang pedantic warning or MSVC C5051.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131346
2022-08-08 09:12:46 -07:00
Corentin Jabot
127bf44385 [Clang][C++20] Support capturing structured bindings in lambdas
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.

This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.

In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.

We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.

In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.

Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.

at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
2022-08-04 10:12:53 +02:00
Corentin Jabot
a274219600 Revert "[Clang][C++20] Support capturing structured bindings in lambdas"
This reverts commit 44f2baa3804a62ca793f0ff3e43aa71cea91a795.

Breaks self builds and seems to have conformance issues.
2022-08-03 21:00:29 +02:00
Corentin Jabot
44f2baa380 [Clang][C++20] Support capturing structured bindings in lambdas
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.

This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.

In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.

We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.

In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.

Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.

at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
2022-08-03 20:00:01 +02:00
Matheus Izvekov
15f3cd6bfc
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-27 11:10:54 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
888673b6e3
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
2022-07-14 21:17:48 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
7c51f02eff
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-15 04:16:55 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
3968936b92
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

  import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
2022-07-13 09:20:30 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
bdc6974f92
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-13 02:10:09 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
0916d96d12 Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC) 2022-06-20 20:17:57 -07:00
Richard Smith
f1b0a4fc54 An expression should only contain an unexpanded parameter pack if it
lexically contains a mention of the pack.

Systematically distinguish between syntactic and semantic references to
packs, especially when propagating dependence from a type into an
expression. We should consult the type-as-written when computing
syntactic dependence and should consult the semantic type when computing
semantic dependence.

Fixes #54402.
2022-03-31 20:02:53 -07:00
Varun Gandhi
92dcb1d2db [Clang] Introduce Swift async calling convention.
This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.

Reviewed By: rjmccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
2021-07-09 11:50:10 -07:00
modimo
42b99e094c [Clang] Check for returns_nonnull when deciding to add allocation null checks
Non-throwing allocators currently will always get null-check code. However, if the non-throwing allocator is explicitly annotated with returns_nonnull the null check should be elided.

Testing:
ninja check-all
added test case correctly elides

Reviewed By: bruno

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102820
2021-06-23 17:15:12 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
aef5d8fdc7 [clang] NFC: Rename rvalue to prvalue
This renames the expression value categories from rvalue to prvalue,
keeping nomenclature consistent with C++11 onwards.

C++ has the most complicated taxonomy here, and every other language
only uses a subset of it, so it's less confusing to use the C++ names
consistently, and mentally remap to the C names when working on that
context (prvalue -> rvalue, no xvalues, etc).

Renames:
* VK_RValue -> VK_PRValue
* Expr::isRValue -> Expr::isPRValue
* SK_QualificationConversionRValue -> SK_QualificationConversionPRValue
* JSON AST Dumper Expression nodes value category: "rvalue" -> "prvalue"

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Reviewed By: rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103720
2021-06-09 12:27:10 +02:00
Hans Wennborg
8ba442bc21 Revert "Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer"
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.

Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.

> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b826591cdf6bd6b468b8a7d23377b29e, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.

This reverts commit 5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e.

It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb9da1a46a0ca4dba2e49e2426036303.

Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."

> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20d0d2b1c5724bb17e969d036fced4cd, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81e72d44bcc58ffe1731bfc7abb73ce0 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c66781b50ff007cb089c5905f9bb9e8af2 by me
> 95c7b6cadbc9a3d4376ef44edbeb3c8bb5b8d7fc by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429473c2b10b109991d7577a3cea41140 by Dave Zarzycki

This reverts commit 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786.

Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"

> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.

This reverts commit 18e093faf726d15f210ab4917142beec51848258.
2021-01-20 15:55:35 +01:00
Richard Smith
5a391d38ac Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
to dependent declarations.

Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
function as being instantiation-dependent.

This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
involving such dependent declarations.

This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
when handling the template.

Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b826591cdf6bd6b468b8a7d23377b29e, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
2021-01-18 21:05:01 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
af0dbaaa38 Revert "Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer"
This reverts commit 8c1f2d15b826591cdf6bd6b468b8a7d23377b29e.

This is part of 5 commits being reverted due to https://crbug.com/1161059. See bug for repro.
2020-12-22 10:18:08 -08:00
Richard Smith
8c1f2d15b8 Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
to dependent declarations.

Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
function as being instantiation-dependent.

This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
involving such dependent declarations.

This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
when handling the template.
2020-12-17 23:54:37 -08:00
Richard Smith
be162f4c0e PR45699: Fix crash if an unexpanded parameter pack appears in a
requires-clause.
2020-12-03 15:26:06 -08:00
Richard Smith
cb9b9842d3 PR47954 / DR2126: permit temporary objects that are lifetime-extended by
variables that are usable in constant expressions to themselves be
usable in constant expressions.
2020-10-23 14:29:18 -07:00
Richard Smith
caf30e7f03 [c++20] For P0732R2: Give class NTTPs the proper type when examined with 'decltype'.
This requires that we track enough information to determine the original
type of the parameter in a substituted non-type template parameter, to
distinguish the reference-to-class case from the class case.
2020-10-21 14:15:54 -07:00
Richard Smith
d1751d14a6 PR47175: Ensure type-dependent function-style casts have dependent
types.

Previously, a type-dependent cast to a deduced class template
specialization type would end up with a non-dependent class template
specialization type, leading to confusion downstream.
2020-10-08 17:00:22 -07:00
Haojian Wu
f8f1e5fb39 [AST] Fix dependence-bits for CXXDefaultInitExpr.
Reviewed By: sammccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87382
2020-09-21 08:47:01 +02:00
Zequan Wu
f975ae4867 [CodeGen][typeid] Emit typeinfo directly if type is known at compile-time
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87425
2020-09-15 12:15:47 -07:00
Serge Pavlov
f1cd6593da [AST][FPEnv] Keep FP options in trailing storage of CastExpr
This is recommit of 6c8041aa0f, reverted in de044f7562 because of some
fails. Original commit message is below.

This change allow a CastExpr to have optional FPOptionsOverride object,
stored in trailing storage. Of all cast nodes only ImplicitCastExpr,
CStyleCastExpr, CXXFunctionalCastExpr and CXXStaticCastExpr are allowed
to have FPOptions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85960
2020-09-14 12:15:21 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
de044f7562 Revert "[AST][FPEnv] Keep FP options in trailing storage of CastExpr"
This reverts commit 6c8041aa0ffed827636935e59c489b1e390c8542.
It caused some fails on buildbots.
2020-09-12 17:06:42 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
6c8041aa0f [AST][FPEnv] Keep FP options in trailing storage of CastExpr
This change allow a CastExpr to have optional FPOptionsOverride object,
stored in trailing storage. Of all cast nodes only ImplicitCastExpr,
CStyleCastExpr, CXXFunctionalCastExpr and CXXStaticCastExpr are allowed
to have FPOptions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85960
2020-09-12 14:30:44 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
70e7aa4a4e [AST][FPEnv] Keep FP options in trailing storage of CallExpr
This change allow a CallExpr to have optional FPOptionsOverride object,
stored in trailing storage. The implementaion is made similar to the way
used in BinaryOperator.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84343
2020-07-24 12:04:19 +07:00
Bruno Ricci
e4d178a752
[clang][Serialization] Don't duplicate the body of LambdaExpr during deserialization
05843dc6ab97a00cbde7aa4f08bf3692eb83109d changed the serialization of the body
of LambdaExpr to avoid a mutation in LambdaExpr::getBody and to avoid a missing
body in LambdaExpr::children.

Unfortunately this replaced one bug by another: we are now duplicating the body
during deserialization; that is after deserialization the identity:

E->getBody() == E->getCallOperator()->getBody() does not hold.

Fix that by instead lazily loading the body from the call operator when needed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83009

Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman, vabridgers
2020-07-02 14:13:35 +01:00