548 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bill Wendling
3c07db5f58 [Clang] Refactor "Designators" into a unified implementation [NFC]
The interfaces for designators (i.e. C99 designated initializers) was
done in two slightly different ways. This was rather wasteful as the
differences could be combined into one.

Reviewed By: rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140584
2023-02-07 12:59:17 -08:00
Alan Zhao
95a4c0c835 [clang] Reland parenthesized aggregate init patches
This commit relands the patches for implementing P0960R3 and P1975R0,
which describe initializing aggregates via a parenthesized list.

The relanded commits are:

* 40c52159d3ee - P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from
  a parenthesized list of values
* c77a91bb7ba7 - Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic
* 32d7aae04fdb - Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode

This patch also fixes a crash in the original implementation.
Previously, if the input tried to call an implicitly deleted copy or
move constructor of a union, we would then try to initialize the union
by initializing it's first element with a reference to a union. This
behavior is incorrect (we should fail to initialize) and if the type of
the first element has a constructor with a single template typename
parameter, then Clang will explode. This patch fixes that issue by
checking that constructor overload resolution did not result in a
deleted function before attempting parenthesized aggregate
initialization.

Additionally, this patch also includes D140159, which contains some
minor fixes made in response to code review comments in the original
implementation that were made after that patch was submitted.

Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>

Fixes #54040, Fixes #59675

Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141546
2023-01-12 09:58:15 -08:00
Corentin Jabot
ca61961380 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, rupprecht

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2023-01-08 10:35:26 +01:00
Alan Zhao
4e02ff2303 [clang] Revert parentesized aggregate initalization patches
This feature causes clang to crash when compiling Chrome - see
https://crbug.com/1405031 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59675

Revert "[clang] Fix a clang crash on invalid code in C++20 mode."

This reverts commit 32d7aae04fdb58e65a952f281ff2f2c3f396d98f.

Revert "[clang] Remove overly restrictive aggregate paren init logic"

This reverts commit c77a91bb7ba793ec3a6a5da3743ed55056291658.

Revert "[clang][C++20] P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from a parenthesized list of values"

This reverts commit 40c52159d3ee337dbed14e4c73b5616ea354c337.
2023-01-04 15:09:36 -08:00
Utkarsh Saxena
b3ce872851 Make evaluation of nested requirement consistent with requires expr.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45563
```
template<class T>  concept True = true;

template <class T>
concept C1 = requires (T) {
   requires True<typename T::value> || True<T>;
};

template <class T>
constexpr bool foo()
requires True<typename T::value> || True<T> {
    return true;
}
static_assert(C1<double>); // Previously failed due to SFINAE error
static_assert(foo<int>()); // but this works fine.
```
The issue here is the discrepancy between how a [nested requirement is evaluated](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp#L2331) Vs how a [non-nested requirement is evaluated](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp#L167-L200).

This patch makes constraint checking consistent for nested requirement
and trailing requires expressions by reusing the same evaluator.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138914
2022-12-19 20:22:03 +01:00
Alan Zhao
40c52159d3 [clang][C++20] P0960R3 and P1975R0: Allow initializing aggregates from a parenthesized list of values
This patch implements P0960R3, which allows initialization of aggregates
via parentheses.

As an example:

```
struct S { int i, j; };
S s1(1, 1);

int arr1[2](1, 2);
```

This patch also implements P1975R0, which fixes the wording of P0960R3
for single-argument parenthesized lists so that statements like the
following are allowed:

```
S s2(1);
S s3 = static_cast<S>(1);
S s4 = (S)1;

int (&&arr2)[] = static_cast<int[]>(1);
int (&&arr3)[2] = static_cast<int[2]>(1);
```

This patch was originally authored by @0x59616e and completed by
@ayzhao.

Fixes #54040, Fixes #54041

Co-authored-by: Sheng <ox59616e@gmail.com>

Full write up : https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-20-rfc-suggestion-desired-regarding-the-implementation-of-p0960r3/63744

Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129531
2022-12-14 07:54:15 -08:00
Krasimir Georgiev
339a7687e1 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit f1f1b60c7ba607e9ffe3bc012161d43ef95ac773.

Temporary revert, possibly triggers a new assertion failure on
QualType::getCommonPtr.
We're working on a reproducer, to follow-up on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554.
2022-12-14 09:10:22 +00:00
Corentin Jabot
f1f1b60c7b Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-12-13 09:57:05 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
be305674bf Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit c9a6713b4788f10b81202b70993068e475b392f7.

Causes crashes, see D136554.
2022-12-09 14:20:30 -08:00
Corentin Jabot
c9a6713b47 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-12-09 10:25:44 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
49c86eab62 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This patch causes another link error,
reverting until I can investigate.

This reverts commit a96a6ed83230265f3eab09a94f0e9525d05f8a74.
2022-12-08 19:57:58 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
a96a6ed832 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-12-08 10:32:54 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
9221bedfd7 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit 26fa17ed2914bd80c066d36b325fd3104e45554c.
This reverts commit 4403c4f9e77e673a2771edfc7ab0ebb234e97485.

There is still an ODR issue causing linker errors, investigating.
2022-11-30 16:03:05 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
26fa17ed29 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-30 11:25:01 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
35a870c30a Revert "Implement CWG2631"
This reverts commit 7acfe3629479c8489fc2d7f629994dc200be990c.
This reverts commit 5f87a892a7bed9cb0599573b9aaf387bc1df9c14.
This reverts commit 6875ac69279a3a02fab382a2c8d121558ecbfa91.
2022-11-04 22:10:50 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
7acfe36294 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-04 14:46:38 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
722a0efe31 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
Breaks the build on some platforms.

This reverts commit bf1e235695a7acdc3e868217e69d5b31ada06cb3.
2022-11-04 08:24:52 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
bf1e235695 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-04 07:58:57 +01:00
Jennifer Yu
ea64e66f7b [OPENMP]Initial support for error directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137209
2022-11-02 14:25:28 -07:00
Erich Keane
975740bf8d "Reapply "GH58368: Correct concept checking in a lambda defined in concept""
This reverts commit cecc9a92cfca71c1b6c2a35c5e302ab649496d11.

The problem ended up being how we were handling the lambda-context in
code generation: we were assuming any decl context here would be a
named-decl, but that isn't the case.  Instead, we just replace it with
the concept's owning context.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136451
2022-10-24 12:36:54 -07:00
Erich Keane
cecc9a92cf Revert "Reapply "GH58368: Correct concept checking in a lambda defined in concept"""
This reverts commit b876f6e2f28779211a829d7d4e841fe68885ae20.

Still getting build failures on PPC AIX that aren't obvious what is causing
them, so reverting while I try to figure this out.
2022-10-24 12:20:23 -07:00
Erich Keane
b876f6e2f2 Reapply "GH58368: Correct concept checking in a lambda defined in concept""
This reverts commit 52930162870fee52d0d9c07c5d66e5dce32b08e8.

Now with updating the ASTBitcodes to show that this AST is incompatible
from the last.
2022-10-24 11:46:54 -07:00
Erich Keane
5293016287 Revert "GH58368: Correct concept checking in a lambda defined in concept"
This reverts commit b7c922607c5ba93db8b893d4ba461052af8317b5.

This seems to cause some problems with some modules related things,
which makes me think I should have updated the version-major in
ast-bit-codes?  Going to revert to confirm this was a problem, then
change that and re-try a commit.
2022-10-24 10:21:22 -07:00
Erich Keane
b7c922607c GH58368: Correct concept checking in a lambda defined in concept
As that bug reports, the problem here is that the lambda's
'context-decl' was not set to the concept, and the lambda picked up
template arguments from the concept.  SO, we failed to get the correct
template arguments in SemaTemplateInstantiate.

However, a Concept Specialization is NOT a decl, its an expression, so
we weren't able to put the concept in the decl tree like we needed.
This patch introduces a ConceptSpecializationDecl, which is the smallest
type possible to use for this purpose, containing only the template
arguments.

The net memory impliciation of this is turning a
trailing-objects into a pointer to a type with trailing-objects,  so it
should be minor.

As future work, we may consider giving this type more responsibility, or
figuring out how to better merge duplicates, but as this is just a
template-argument collection at the moment, there isn't much value to
it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136451
2022-10-24 06:32:18 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
bcd9ba2b7e
[clang] Track the templated entity in type substitution.
This is a change to how we represent type subsitution in the AST.
Instead of only storing the replaced type, we track the templated
entity we are substituting, plus an index.
We modify MLTAL to track the templated entity at each level.

Otherwise, it's much more expensive to go from the template parameter back
to the templated entity, and not possible to do in some cases, as when
we instantiate outer templates, parameters might still reference the
original entity.

This also allows us to very cheaply lookup the templated entity we saw in
the naming context and find the corresponding argument it was replaced
from, such as for implementing template specialization resugaring.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131858
2022-10-15 22:08:36 +02:00
Erich Keane
684a78968b Reapply "[Concepts] Recover properly from a RecoveryExpr in a concept"
This reverts commit 192d69f7e65a625e344421841e731e39f80595f5.

This fixes the condition to check whether this is a situation where we
are in a recovery-expr'ed concept a little better, so we don't access an
inactive member of a union, which should make the bots happy.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134542
2022-09-26 08:39:10 -07:00
Erich Keane
192d69f7e6 Revert "[Concepts] Recover properly from a RecoveryExpr in a concept"
This reverts commit e3d14bee238b672a7a112311eefee55e142eaefc.

There are apparently a large number of crashes in libcxx and some JSON
Parser thing, so clearly this has some sort of serious issue.  Reverting
so I can take some time to figure out what is going on.
2022-09-26 06:55:25 -07:00
Erich Keane
e3d14bee23 [Concepts] Recover properly from a RecoveryExpr in a concept
Discovered by reducing a different problem, we currently assert because
we failed to make the constraint expressions not dependent, since a
RecoveryExpr cannot be transformed.

This patch fixes that, and gets reasonably nice diagnostics by
introducing a concept (hah!) of "ContainsErrors" to the Satisfaction
types, which causes us to treat the candidate as non-viable.

However, just making THAT candidate non-viable would result in choosing
the 'next best' canddiate, which can result in awkward errors, where we
start evaluating a candidate that is not intended to be selected.
Because of this, and to make diagnostics more relevant, we now just
cause the entire lookup to result in a 'no-viable-candidates'.

This means we will only emit the list of candidates, rather than any
cascading failures.
2022-09-26 06:33:48 -07:00
Serge Pavlov
f7819ce166 [FPEnv] Allow CompoundStmt to keep FP options
This is a recommit of b822efc7404bf09ccfdc1ab7657475026966c3b2,
reverted in dc34d8df4c48b3a8f474360970cae8a58e6c84f0. The commit caused
fails because the test ast-print-fp-pragmas.c did not specify particular
target, and it failed on targets which do not support constrained
intrinsics. The original commit message is below.

AST does not have special nodes for pragmas. Instead a pragma modifies
some state variables of Sema, which in turn results in modified
attributes of AST nodes. This technique applies to floating point
operations as well. Every AST node that can depend on FP options keeps
current set of them.

This technique works well for options like exception behavior or fast
math options. They represent instructions to the compiler how to modify
code generation for the affected nodes. However treatment of FP control
modes has problems with this technique. Modifying FP control mode
(like rounding direction) usually requires operations on hardware, like
writing to control registers. It must be done prior to the first
operation that depends on the control mode. In particular, such
operations are required for implementation of `pragma STDC FENV_ROUND`,
compiler should set up necessary rounding direction at the beginning of
compound statement where the pragma occurs. As there is no representation
for pragmas in AST, the code generation becomes a complicated task in
this case.

To solve this issue FP options are kept inside CompoundStmt. Unlike to FP
options in expressions, these does not affect any operation on FP values,
but only inform the codegen about the FP options that act in the body of
the statement. As all pragmas that modify FP environment may occurs only
at the start of compound statement or at global level, such solution
works for all relevant pragmas. The options are kept as a difference
from the options in the enclosing compound statement or default options,
it helps codegen to set only changed control modes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123952
2022-07-03 17:06:26 +07:00
Fazlay Rabbi
38bcd483dd [OpenMP] Initial parsing and semantic support for 'parallel masked taskloop simd' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.10)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128946
2022-07-01 08:57:15 -07:00
Serge Pavlov
dc34d8df4c Revert "[FPEnv] Allow CompoundStmt to keep FP options"
On some buildbots test `ast-print-fp-pragmas.c` fails, need to investigate it.

This reverts commit 0401fd12d4aa0553347fe34d666fb236d8719173.
This reverts commit b822efc7404bf09ccfdc1ab7657475026966c3b2.
2022-07-01 15:42:39 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
b822efc740 [FPEnv] Allow CompoundStmt to keep FP options
AST does not have special nodes for pragmas. Instead a pragma modifies
some state variables of Sema, which in turn results in modified
attributes of AST nodes. This technique applies to floating point
operations as well. Every AST node that can depend on FP options keeps
current set of them.

This technique works well for options like exception behavior or fast
math options. They represent instructions to the compiler how to modify
code generation for the affected nodes. However treatment of FP control
modes has problems with this technique. Modifying FP control mode
(like rounding direction) usually requires operations on hardware, like
writing to control registers. It must be done prior to the first
operation that depends on the control mode. In particular, such
operations are required for implementation of `pragma STDC FENV_ROUND`,
compiler should set up necessary rounding direction at the beginning of
compound statement where the pragma occurs. As there is no representation
for pragmas in AST, the code generation becomes a complicated task in
this case.

To solve this issue FP options are kept inside CompoundStmt. Unlike to FP
options in expressions, these does not affect any operation on FP values,
but only inform the codegen about the FP options that act in the body of
the statement. As all pragmas that modify FP environment may occurs only
at the start of compound statement or at global level, such solution
works for all relevant pragmas. The options are kept as a difference
from the options in the enclosing compound statement or default options,
it helps codegen to set only changed control modes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123952
2022-07-01 14:32:33 +07:00
Fazlay Rabbi
d64ba896d3 [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'parallel masked taskloop' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.9)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128834
2022-06-30 11:44:17 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi
73e5d7bdff [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'masked taskloop simd' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.8)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128693
2022-06-28 15:27:49 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi
42bb88e2aa [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'masked taskloop' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for "masked taskloop"
construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.7)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128478
2022-06-24 10:00:08 -07:00
Jennifer Yu
bb83f8e70b [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema for 'parallel masked' construct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127454
2022-06-16 18:01:15 -07:00
Shilei Tian
c4a90db720 [Clang][OpenMP] Add the codegen support for atomic compare capture
This patch adds the codegen support for `atomic compare capture` in clang.

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120290
2022-06-02 21:38:21 -04:00
Sam McCall
0cd5cd19af [Serialization] write expr dependence bits as a single integer
When exprs are written unabbreviated:
  - these were encoded as 5 x vbr6 = 30 bits
  - now they fit exactly into a one-chunk vbr = 6 bits

clangd --check=clangd/AST.cpp reports ~1% reduction in PCH size
(42826720->42474460)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124250
2022-04-25 12:09:40 +02:00
Mike Rice
f82ec5532b [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp target parallel loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the
 #pragma omp target parallel loop directive.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122359
2022-03-24 09:19:00 -07:00
Mike Rice
2cedaee6f7 [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp parallel loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the
  #pragma omp parallel loop directive.

 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122247
2022-03-22 13:55:47 -07:00
Mike Rice
6bd8dc91b8 [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp target teams loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the
 #pragma omp target teams loop directive.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122028
2022-03-18 13:48:32 -07:00
Mike Rice
79f661edc1 [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp teams loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the #pragma omp teams loop
directive.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121713
2022-03-16 14:39:18 -07:00
Alexey Bataev
80256605f8 [OpenMP] support depend clause for taskwait directive, by Deepak
Eachempati.

This patch adds clang (parsing, sema, serialization, codegen) support for the 'depend' clause on the 'taskwait' directive.

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113540
2021-11-19 06:30:17 -08:00
Mike Rice
6f9c25167d [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the #pragma omp loop
directive.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112499
2021-10-28 08:26:43 -07:00
Nico Weber
c7aaa2efef [clang] Add range accessor for ObjCAtTryStmt catch_stmts and use it
No behavior change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112543
2021-10-27 08:57:05 -04:00
Michael Kruse
2130117f92 [Clang][OpenMP] Allow loop-transformations with template parameters.
Clang would reject

    #pragma omp for
    #pragma omp tile sizes(P)
    for (int i = 0; i < 128; ++i) {}

where P is a template parameter, but the loop itself is not
template-dependent. Because P context-dependent, the TransformedStmt
cannot be generated and therefore is nullptr (until the template is
instantiated by TreeTransform). The OMPForDirective would still expect
the a loop is the dependent context and trigger an error.

Fix by introducing a NumGeneratedLoops field to OMPLoopTransformation.
This is used to distinguish the case where no TransformedStmt will be
generated at all (e.g. #pragma omp unroll full) and template
instantiation is needed. In the latter case, delay resolving the
iteration space like when the for-loop itself is template-dependent
until the template instatiation.

A more radical solution would always delay the iteration space analysis
until template instantiation, but would also break many test cases.

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111124
2021-10-06 12:21:04 -05:00
Michael Kruse
f37e8b0b83 [Clang][OpenMP] Infix OMPLoopTransformationDirective abstract class. NFC.
Insert OMPLoopTransformationDirective between OMPLoopBasedDirective and the loop transformations OMPTileDirective and OMPUnrollDirective. This simplifies handling of loop transformations not requiring distinguishing between OMPTileDirective and OMPUnrollDirective anymore.

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111119
2021-10-06 10:49:07 -05:00
Corentin Jabot
424733c12a Implement if consteval (P1938)
Modify the IfStmt node to suppoort constant evaluated expressions.

Add a new ExpressionEvaluationContext::ImmediateFunctionContext to
keep track of immediate function contexts.

This proved easier/better/probably more efficient than walking the AST
backward as it allows diagnosing nested if consteval statements.
2021-10-05 08:04:14 -04:00
alokmishra.besu
000875c127 OpenMP 5.0 metadirective
This patch supports OpenMP 5.0 metadirective features.
It is implemented keeping the OpenMP 5.1 features like dynamic user condition in mind.

A new function, getBestWhenMatchForContext, is defined in llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.h

Currently this function return the index of the when clause with the highest score from the ones applicable in the Context.
But this function is declared with an array which can be used in OpenMP 5.1 implementation to select all the valid when clauses which can be resolved in runtime. Currently this array is set to null by default and its implementation is left for future.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944
2021-09-18 13:40:44 -05:00
Nico Weber
31cca21565 Revert "OpenMP 5.0 metadirective"
This reverts commit c7d7b98e5263472f05b2f3cb767b5d16e1349e9a.
Breaks tests on macOS, see comment on https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944
2021-09-18 09:10:37 -04:00