This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
There is a problem in loop cache analysis that the types of SCEV variables
`Coeff` and `ElemSize` in function `isConsecutive()` may not match. The
mismatch would cause SCEV failures when `Coeff` is multiplied with `ElemSize`.
The fix in this patch is to extend the type of both `Coeff` and `ElemSize` to
whichever is wider in those two variables. As a clean-up, duplicate calculations
of `Stride` in `computeRefCost()` is then removed.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, #loopoptwg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128877
This is a follow-up patch to D122857 where we added delinearization of
fixed-size arrays to loop cache analysis, which resulted in some duplicate
code, i.e., "tryDelinearizeFixedSize()", in LoopCacheCost.cpp and
DependenceAnalysis.cpp. Refactoring is done in this patch.
This patch refactors out the main logic of "tryDelinearizeFixedSize()" as
"tryDelinearizeFixedSizeImpl()" and moves it to Delinearization.cpp, such that
clients can reuse "llvm::tryDelinearizeFixedSizeImpl()" wherever they would
like to delinearize fixed-size arrays. Currently it has two users, i.e.,
DependenceAnalysis.cpp and LoopCacheCost.cpp.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, #loopoptwg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124745
Currently loop cache cost (LCC) cannot analyze fix-sized arrays
since it cannot delinearize them. This patch adds the capability
to delinearize fix-sized arrays to LCC. Most of the code is ported
from DependenceAnalysis.cpp and some refactoring will be done in a
next patch.
Reviewed By: #loopoptwg, Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122857
This reverts commit fd4808887ee47f3ec8a030e9211169ef4fb094c3.
This patch causes gcc to issue a lot of warnings like:
warning: base class ‘class llvm::MCParsedAsmOperand’ should be
explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]
None of this logic has anything to do with SCEV's internals, it just uses the existing public APIs. As a result, we can move the code from ScalarEvolution.cpp/hpp to Delinearization.cpp/hpp with only minor changes.
This was discussed in advance on today's loop opt call. It turned out to be easy as hoped.
fix an assertion due to mismatch type for Numerator and CacheLineSize in loop cache analysis pass.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107618
It can be used to avoid passing the begin and end of a range.
This makes the code shorter and it is consistent with another
wrappers we already have.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78016
LoopCacheAnalysis currently assumes the loop will be iterated over in
a forward direction. This patch addresses the issue by using the
absolute value of the stride when iterating backwards.
Note: this patch will treat negative and positive array access the
same, resulting in the same cost being calculated for single and
bi-directional access patterns. This should be improved in a
subsequent patch.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73064
Ensure the stride and trip count have the same type before multiplying them during reference cost calculation
Reviewed By: jdoefert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70192
Summary:This patch fixes the following warnings uncovered by PVS
Studio:
/home/xbolva00/LLVM/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopCacheAnalysis.cpp
353 warn V612 An unconditional 'return' within a loop.
/home/xbolva00/LLVM/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopCacheAnalysis.cpp
456 err V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it
was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '=='
operator.
Authored By:etiotto
Reviewer:Meinersbur, kbarton, bmahjour, Whitney, xbolva00
Reviewed By:xbolva00
Subscribers:hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag:LLVM
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D69821
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary: Implement a new analysis to estimate the number of cache lines
required by a loop nest.
The analysis is largely based on the following paper:
Compiler Optimizations for Improving Data Locality
By: Steve Carr, Katherine S. McKinley, Chau-Wen Tseng
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/papers/asplos-1994.pdf
The analysis considers temporal reuse (accesses to the same memory
location) and spatial reuse (accesses to memory locations within a cache
line). For simplicity the analysis considers memory accesses in the
innermost loop in a loop nest, and thus determines the number of cache
lines used when the loop L in loop nest LN is placed in the innermost
position.
The result of the analysis can be used to drive several transformations.
As an example, loop interchange could use it determine which loops in a
perfect loop nest should be interchanged to maximize cache reuse.
Similarly, loop distribution could be enhanced to take into
consideration cache reuse between arrays when distributing a loop to
eliminate vectorization inhibiting dependencies.
The general approach taken to estimate the number of cache lines used by
the memory references in the inner loop of a loop nest is:
Partition memory references that exhibit temporal or spatial reuse into
reference groups.
For each loop L in the a loop nest LN: a. Compute the cost of the
reference group b. Compute the 'cache cost' of the loop nest by summing
up the reference groups costs
For further details of the algorithm please refer to the paper.
Authored By: etiotto
Reviewers: hfinkel, Meinersbur, jdoerfert, kbarton, bmahjour, anemet,
fhahn
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: reames, nemanjai, MaskRay, wuzish, Hahnfeld, xusx595,
venkataramanan.kumar.llvm, greened, dmgreen, steleman, fhahn, xblvaOO,
Whitney, mgorny, hiraditya, mgrang, jsji, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63459
llvm-svn: 368439
