Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
Summary:
In PR39232, we noticed that some variant tests started failing in C++2a mode
with recent Clangs, because the rules for literal types changed in C++2a. As
a result, a temporary fix was checked in (enabling the test only in C++17).
This commit is what I believe should be the long term fix: I removed the
tests that checked constexpr default-constructibility with a weird type
from the tests for index() and valueless_by_exception(), and instead I
added tests for those using an obviously literal type in the test for the
default constructor.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54767
llvm-svn: 347568
The XFAIL started passing since we're only testing for trivial-copyability of
reference_wrapper in C++14 and above. This commit constrains the XFAIL to
gcc-4.9 with C++14 (it would also fail on C++17 and above, but those standards
are not available with GCC 4.9).
llvm-svn: 347264
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
Summary:
P1006 adds support for constexpr in the specialization of pointer_traits
for raw pointers. This is necessary in order to use pointer_traits in
the upcoming constexpr containers. We expect P1006 to be voted into the
working draft for C++20 at the San Diego meeting.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53867
llvm-svn: 346764
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
type.
Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.
llvm-svn: 342560
Summary:
Major QoI considerations:
- The facility is backported to C++14, same as libstdc++.
- Efforts have been made to minimize the header dependencies.
- The design is friendly to the uses of MSVC intrinsics (`__emulu`, `_umul128`, `_BitScanForward`, `_BitScanForward64`) but not implemented; future contributions are welcome.
Thanks to Milo Yip for contributing the implementation of `__u64toa` and `__u32toa`.
References:
https://wg21.link/p0067r5https://wg21.link/p0682r1
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: ldionne, Quuxplusone, christof, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41458
llvm-svn: 338479
* Remove unused type from is_assignable.pass.cpp
* Don't specialize `common_type<::X<float>>` in common_type.pass.cpp, which violates the requirements of [meta.trans.other]/5
llvm-svn: 336618
Checking for complete types is really rather tricky when you consider
the amount of specializations required to check a function type. This
specifically caused PR37407 where we incorrectly diagnosed
noexcept function types as incomplete (but there were plenty of other
cases that would cause this).
This patch removes the complete type checking for now. I'm going
to look into adding a clang builtin to correctly do this for us.
llvm-svn: 332040
