9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song
111fcb0df0 [llvm] Fix duplicate word typos. NFC
Those fixes were taken from https://reviews.llvm.org/D137338
2023-09-01 18:25:16 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
998960ee1f [CodeGen] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-02 20:36:08 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
1fa870b1bd Use None consistently (NFC)
This patch replaces NoneType() and NoneType::None with None in
preparation for migration from llvm::Optional to std::optional.

In the std::optional world, we are not guranteed to be able to
default-construct std::nullopt_t or peek what's inside it, so neither
NoneType() nor NoneType::None has a corresponding expression in the
std::optional world.

Once we consistently use None, we should even be able to replace the
contents of llvm/include/llvm/ADT/None.h with something like:

  using NoneType = std::nullopt_t;
  inline constexpr std::nullopt_t None = std::nullopt;

to ease the migration from llvm::Optional to std::optional.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138376
2022-11-20 00:24:40 -08:00
serge-sans-paille
989f1c72e0 Cleanup codegen includes
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169

after:  1061034926
before: 1063332844

Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121681
2022-03-16 08:43:00 +01:00
Nico Weber
a278250b0f Revert "Cleanup codegen includes"
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
2022-03-10 07:59:22 -05:00
serge-sans-paille
7f230feeea Cleanup codegen includes
after:  1061034926
before: 1063332844

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
2022-03-10 10:00:30 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
c4a8928b51 [CodeGen] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-12-06 08:49:10 -08:00
Djordje Todorovic
fa2daaeff8 [2/2][RemoveRedundantDebugValues] Add a Pass that removes redundant DBG_VALUEs
This patch adds the forward scan for finding redundant DBG_VALUEs.

This analysis aims to remove redundant DBG_VALUEs by going forward
in the basic block by considering the first DBG_VALUE as a valid
until its first (location) operand is not clobbered/modified.
For example:

(1) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
(2) <block of code that does affect $edi>
(3) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
 ...
in this case, we can remove (3).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105280
2021-07-15 00:08:31 -07:00
Djordje Todorovic
df686842bc [RemoveRedundantDebugValues] Add a Pass that removes redundant DBG_VALUEs
This new MIR pass removes redundant DBG_VALUEs.

After the register allocator is done, more precisely, after
the Virtual Register Rewriter, we end up having duplicated
DBG_VALUEs, since some virtual registers are being rewritten
into the same physical register as some of existing DBG_VALUEs.
Each DBG_VALUE should indicate (at least before the LiveDebugValues)
variables assignment, but it is being clobbered for function
parameters during the SelectionDAG since it generates new DBG_VALUEs
after COPY instructions, even though the parameter has no assignment.
For example, if we had a DBG_VALUE $regX as an entry debug value
representing the parameter, and a COPY and after the COPY,
DBG_VALUE $virt_reg, and after the virtregrewrite the $virt_reg gets
rewritten into $regX, we'd end up having redundant DBG_VALUE.

This breaks the definition of the DBG_VALUE since some analysis passes
might be built on top of that premise..., and this patch tries to fix
the MIR with the respect to that.

This first patch performs bacward scan, by trying to detect a sequence of
consecutive DBG_VALUEs, and to remove all DBG_VALUEs describing one
variable but the last one:

For example:

(1) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
(2) DBG_VALUE $esi, !"var2", ...
(3) DBG_VALUE $edi, !"var1", ...
 ...

in this case, we can remove (1).

By combining the forward scan that will be introduced in the next patch
(from this stack), by inspecting the statistics, the RemoveRedundantDebugValues
removes 15032 instructions by using gdb-7.11 as a testbed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105279
2021-07-14 04:29:42 -07:00