Having a finite Depth (or recursion limit) for computeKnownBits is very
limiting, but is currently a load-bearing necessity, as all KnownBits
are recomputed on each call and there is no caching. As a prerequisite
for an effort to remove the recursion limit altogether, either using a
clever caching technique, or writing a easily-invalidable KnownBits
analysis, make the Depth argument in APIs in ValueTracking uniformly the
last argument with a default value. This would aid in removing the
argument when the time comes, as many callers that currently pass 0
explicitly are now updated to omit the argument altogether.
If ValueTracking can guarantee non-NaN and non-INF and the `nsz`
fast-math flag is set, we can simplify X * 0.0 ==> 0.0.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/XacRQZ
add `GenericFloatingPointPredicateUtils` in order to generalize
effects of floating point comparisons on `KnownFPClass` for both IR and
MIR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Arsenault <arsenm2@gmail.com>
Following from the discussion in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138095#discussion_r2070484664,
these intrinsics are poison if any of their operands are poison, and are
marked as such in propagatesPoison in ValueTracking.cpp.
This will help fold away leftover vectors produced by VectorCombine when
scalarizing intrinsics.
Relative to the previous attempt this includes two fixes:
* Adjust callCapturesBefore() to not skip captures(ret: address,
provenance) arguments, as these will not count as a capture
at the call-site.
* When visiting uses during stack slot optimization, don't skip
the ModRef check for passthru captures. Calls can both modref
and be passthru for captures.
------
This extends CaptureTracking to support inferring non-trivial
CaptureInfos. The focus of this patch is to only support FunctionAttrs,
other users of CaptureTracking will be updated in followups.
The key API changes here are:
* DetermineUseCaptureKind() now returns a UseCaptureInfo where the UseCC
component specifies what is captured at that Use and the ResultCC
component specifies what may be captured via the return value of the
User. Usually only one or the other will be used (corresponding to
previous MAY_CAPTURE or PASSTHROUGH results), but both may be set for
call captures.
* The CaptureTracking::captures() extension point is passed this
UseCaptureInfo as well and then can decide what to do with it by
returning an Action, which is one of: Stop: stop traversal.
ContinueIgnoringReturn: continue traversal but don't follow the
instruction return value. Continue: continue traversal and follow the
instruction return value if it has additional CaptureComponents.
For now, this patch retains the (unsound) special logic for comparison
of null with a dereferenceable pointer. I'd like to switch key code to
take advantage of address/address_is_null before dropping it.
This PR mainly intends to introduce necessary API changes and basic
inference support, there are various possible improvements marked with
TODOs.
Relative to the previous attempt, this adjusts isEscapeSource()
to not treat calls with captures(ret: address, provenance) or similar
arguments as escape sources. This addresses the miscompile reported at:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125880#issuecomment-2656632577
The implementation uses a helper function on CallBase to make this
check a bit more efficient (e.g. by skipping the byval checks) as
checking attributes on all arguments if fairly expensive.
------
This extends CaptureTracking to support inferring non-trivial
CaptureInfos. The focus of this patch is to only support FunctionAttrs,
other users of CaptureTracking will be updated in followups.
The key API changes here are:
* DetermineUseCaptureKind() now returns a UseCaptureInfo where the UseCC
component specifies what is captured at that Use and the ResultCC
component specifies what may be captured via the return value of the
User. Usually only one or the other will be used (corresponding to
previous MAY_CAPTURE or PASSTHROUGH results), but both may be set for
call captures.
* The CaptureTracking::captures() extension point is passed this
UseCaptureInfo as well and then can decide what to do with it by
returning an Action, which is one of: Stop: stop traversal.
ContinueIgnoringReturn: continue traversal but don't follow the
instruction return value. Continue: continue traversal and follow the
instruction return value if it has additional CaptureComponents.
For now, this patch retains the (unsound) special logic for comparison
of null with a dereferenceable pointer. I'd like to switch key code to
take advantage of address/address_is_null before dropping it.
This PR mainly intends to introduce necessary API changes and basic
inference support, there are various possible improvements marked with
TODOs.
This extends CaptureTracking to support inferring non-trivial
CaptureInfos. The focus of this patch is to only support FunctionAttrs,
other users of CaptureTracking will be updated in followups.
The key API changes here are:
* DetermineUseCaptureKind() now returns a UseCaptureInfo where the UseCC
component specifies what is captured at that Use and the ResultCC
component specifies what may be captured via the return value of the
User. Usually only one or the other will be used (corresponding to
previous MAY_CAPTURE or PASSTHROUGH results), but both may be set for
call captures.
* The CaptureTracking::captures() extension point is passed this
UseCaptureInfo as well and then can decide what to do with it by
returning an Action, which is one of: Stop: stop traversal.
ContinueIgnoringReturn: continue traversal but don't follow the
instruction return value. Continue: continue traversal and follow the
instruction return value if it has additional CaptureComponents.
For now, this patch retains the (unsound) special logic for comparison
of null with a dereferenceable pointer. I'd like to switch key code to
take advantage of address/address_is_null before dropping it.
This PR mainly intends to introduce necessary API changes and basic
inference support, there are various possible improvements marked with
TODOs.
The comment about inbounds protecting only against unsigned wrapping is
incorrect: it also protects against signed wrapping, but the issue is
that it could cross the sign boundary.
- **[InstSimplify] Refactor `simplifyWithOpsReplaced` to allow multiple
replacements; NFC**
- **[InstSimplify] Use multi-op replacement when simplify `select`**
In the case of `select X | Y == 0 :...` or `select X & Y == -1 : ...`
we can do more simplifications by trying to replace both `X` and `Y`
with the respective constant at once.
Handles some cases for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121672
more generically.
In the simplifySelectWithEquivalence fold, simplify both operands before
comparing them, instead of comparing one simplified operand with a
non-simplified operand. This is slightly more powerful.
If x is NaN, then fmul (x, 1) may produce a different NaN value.
Our float semantics explicitly permit folding fmul (x, 1) to x, but we
can't do this when we're replacing a select input, as selects are
supposed to preserve the exact bitwise value.
Fixes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115152#issuecomment-2545773114.
With the introduction of CmpPredicate in 51a895a (IR: introduce struct
with CmpInst::Predicate and samesign), PatternMatch is one of the first
key pieces of infrastructure that must be updated to match a CmpInst
respecting samesign information. Implement this change to Cmp-matchers.
This is a preparatory step in migrating the codebase over to
CmpPredicate. Since we no functional changes are desired at this stage,
we have chosen not to migrate CmpPredicate::operator==(CmpPredicate)
calls to use CmpPredicate::getMatching(), as that would have visible
impact on tests that are not yet written: instead, we call
CmpPredicate::operator==(Predicate), preserving the old behavior, while
also inserting a few FIXME comments for follow-ups.
Introduce llvm::CmpPredicate, an abstraction over a floating-point
predicate, and a pack of an integer predicate with samesign information,
in order to ease extending large portions of the codebase that take a
CmpInst::Predicate to respect the samesign flag.
We have chosen to demonstrate the utility of this new abstraction by
migrating parts of ValueTracking, InstructionSimplify, and InstCombine
from CmpInst::Predicate to llvm::CmpPredicate. There should be no
functional changes, as we don't perform any extra optimizations with
samesign in this patch, or use CmpPredicate::getMatching.
The design approach taken by this patch allows for unaudited callers of
APIs that take a llvm::CmpPredicate to silently drop the samesign
information; it does not pose a correctness issue, and allows us to
migrate the codebase piece-wise.
InstSimplify currently folds patterns like `(x | y) uge x` and `(x & y)
ule x` to true. However, it cannot handle combinations of such
situations, such as `(x | y) uge (x & z)` etc.
To support this, recursively collect operands of monotonic instructions
(that preserve either a greater-or-equal or less-or-equal relationship)
and then check whether any of them match.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69333.
Since cd16b07 (IR: introduce CmpInst::isEquivalence), there is now an
isEquivalence routine in CmpInst that we can use to determine
equivalence in simplifySelectWithICmpEq. Implement this, extending the
code from integer-equalities to integer and floating-point equivalences.
InstSimplify currently folds alloc1 == alloc2 to false, even if one of
them is a zero-size allocation. A zero-size allocation may have the same
address as another allocation.
This also disables the fold for the case where we're comparing a
zero-size alloc with the middle of another allocation. It's possible
that this case is legal to fold depending on our precise zero-size
allocation semantics, but LangRef currently doesn't specify this either
way, so we shouldn't make assumptions here.
Factor out and unify common code from InstSimplify and InstCombine that
partially guard against cross-lane vector operations into
llvm::isNotCrossLaneOperation in ValueTracking.
Alive2 proofs for changed tests: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/68H4ka
decomposeBitTestICmp() currently returns the result via two out
parameters plus an in-place modification of Pred. This changes it to
return an optional struct instead.
The motivation here is twofold. First, I'd like to extend this code to
handle cases where the comparison is against a value other than zero,
which would mean yet another out parameter. Second, while doing that I
was badly bitten by the in-place modification, so I'd like to get rid of
it.
The final case in Simplify (where Res == Absorber and the predicate is
inverted) is not generally safe when the simplification is a refinement.
In particular, we may simplify assuming a specific value for undef, but
then chose a different one later.
However, it *is* safe to refine poison in this context, unlike in the
equivalent select folds. This is the reason why this fold did not use
AllowRefinement=false in the first place, and using that option would
introduce a lot of test regressions.
This patch takes the middle path of disabling undef refinements in
particular using the getWithoutUndef() SimplifyQuery option. However,
this option doesn't actually work in this case, because the problematic
fold is inside constant folding, and we currently don't propagate this
option all the way from InstSimplify over ConstantFolding to
ConstantFold. Work around this by explicitly checking for undef operands
in simplifyWithOpReplaced().
Finally, make sure that places where AllowRefinement=false also use
Q.getWithoutUndef(). I don't have a specific test case for this (the
original one does not work because we don't simplify selects with
constant condition in this mode in the first place) but this seems like
the correct thing to do to be conservative.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/98753.
This patch avoids calling `isKnownNeverNaN` in `simplifyAndOrOfFCmps`
since `fcmp ord/uno X, NNAN` will be canonicalized into `fcmp ord/uno X,
0.0` in InstCombine.
In InstSimplify we already fold `fcmp ord/uno` to a constant when both
operands are known to be non-NaN. This change slightly generalizes this
to also handle the case where either of the operands is known to always
be NaN.
Proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/AhCmJN
