This is a follow-up to b71edfaa4ec3c998aadb35255ce2f60bba2940b0
since I forgot the lit.local.cfg files in that one.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: barannikov88, kwk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150762
With this patch an undefined mask in a shufflevector will be printed as poison.
This change is done to support the new shufflevector semantics
for undefined mask elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149210
Based off D148215, when expanding a min/max reduction we should be creating min/max intrinsics directly instead of relying on instcombine to fold them back together.
This patch handles integer min/max cases. Hopefully we can add floating point support soon (at least for fastmath/nnan cases) - but we're missing some of the plumbing to pass the correct FMF to the intrinsic at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148221
Metric: size..text
size..text results results0 diff
SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/GCC-C-execute-980605-1.test 445.00 461.00 3.6%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll.test 428477.00 428445.00 -0.0%
External/SPEC/CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test 618849.00 618785.00 -0.0%
For all tests some extra code was optimized, GCC-C-execute has some more
inlining after
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132261
This patch adds metadata to disable runtime unrolling to the vectorized
loop. If runtime unrolling/interleaving is considered profitable, LV
will interleave the loop directly. There should be no need to perform
runtime unrolling at a later stage.
Note that we already add metadata to disable runtime unrolling to the
scalar loop after vectorization.
The additional unrolling unnecessarily increases code size and compile
time. In addition to that we have several bug reports of unncessary
runtime unrolling for vectorized loops, e.g. PR40961
Compile-time improvements:
NewPM-O3: -1.04%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: -0.59%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: -0.97%
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ce1be13a868d0f8afa367975558c1a6175cce33a&to=78bc2e67f22e9e10e61cdb6cdac4bb857d95eb1b&stat=instructions:uFixes#40306.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115261
This puts lower insert indexes before higher. This is independent
of endian, so it requires an adjustment to a fold added with
4446f71ce392, but it makes that fold more robust.
That's also where this patch was suggested - D139668.
This matches what we already do in DAGCombiner, but there is one
more constraint because there's an existing canonicalization for
insert-of-scalar-constant. I'm not sure if that is still needed,
so it may be adjusted/removed as a follow-up.
This replaces patches that tried to convert related patterns to shuffles
(D138872, D138873, D138874 - reverted/abandoned) but caused codegen
problems and were questionable as a canonicalization because an
insertelement is a simpler op than a shuffle.
This detects a larger pattern -- insert-of-insert -- and replaces with
another insert, so this hopefully does not cause any problems.
As noted by TODO items in the code and tests, this could go a lot further.
But this is enough to reduce the motivating test from issue #17113.
Example proofs:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/NnUv3a
I drafted a version of this for AggressiveInstCombine, but it seems that
would uncover yet another phase ordering gap. If we do generalize this to
handle the full range of potential patterns, that may be worth looking at
again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139668
This reverts commit e71b81cab09bf33e3b08ed600418b72cc4117461.
As discussed in the planned follow-on to this patch (D138874),
this and the subsequent patches in this set can cause trouble for
the backend, and there's probably no quick fix. We may even
want to canonicalize in the opposite direction (towards insertelt).
The first attempt was reverted because a clang test changed
unexpectedly - the file is already marked with a FIXME, so
I just updated it this time to pass.
Original commit message:
This is the main patch for converting a truncated scalar that is
inserted into a vector to bitcast+shuffle. We could go either way
on patterns like this, but this direction will allow collapsing a
pair of these sequences on the motivating example from issue
The patch is split into 3 parts to make it easier to see the
progression of tests diffs. We allow inserting/shuffling into a
different size vector for flexibility, so there are several test
variations. The length-changing is handled by shortening/padding
the shuffle mask with undef elements.
In part 1, handle the basic pattern:
inselt undef, (trunc T), IndexC --> shuffle (bitcast T), IdentityMask
Proof for the endian-dependency behaving as expected:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/BsA7yC
The TODO items for handling shifts and insert into an arbitrary base
vector value are implemented as follow-ups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138872
This is the main patch for converting a truncated scalar that is
inserted into a vector to bitcast+shuffle. We could go either way
on patterns like this, but this direction will allow collapsing a
pair of these sequences on the motivating example from issue
The patch is split into 3 parts to make it easier to see the
progression of tests diffs. We allow inserting/shuffling into a
different size vector for flexibility, so there are several test
variations. The length-changing is handled by shortening/padding
the shuffle mask with undef elements.
In part 1, handle the basic pattern:
inselt undef, (trunc T), IndexC --> shuffle (bitcast T), IdentityMask
Proof for the endian-dependency behaving as expected:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/BsA7yC
The TODO items for handling shifts and insert into an arbitrary base
vector value are implemented as follow-ups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138872
As part of legacy PM optimization pipeline removal.
This shouldn't be used in codegen pipelines so it should be ok to remove.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137116
Two lit tests were found running something like this:
opt -O<n> -pass-locked-to-legacy-PM ...
The expand-atomicrmw-xchg-fp.ll seem to have used -O1 just to ensure
that the -atomic-expand pass were thinking that it wasn't running at
O0 level. Same thing can be ensured by using the -codegen-opt-level=1
option, making it possible to avoid using O1 in that test case.
In the vector-reductions-expanded.ll test case it was possible to
split the RUN line into using two opt invocations. First running
"opt -O2" using the new PM, and then running "opt -expand-reductions"
using the legacy PM.
I think that given this patch we get closer to removing code related
to 'AddOptimizationPasses' in opt.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137626
This reverts commit bd7949bcd86633bd4203b2ba6f891aea00fce4d1.
Revert this patch since reviwers have different opinions regarding
the approach in post-commit review.
Will open RFC for further discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132408
This patch extends the load merge/widen in AggressiveInstCombine() to handle reverse load patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135137
Revert rGef89409a59f3b79ae143b33b7d8e6ee6285aa42f "Fix 'unused-lambda-capture' gcc warning. NFCI."
Revert rG926ccfef032d206dcbcdf74ca1e3a9ebf4d1be45 "[SLP] ScalarizationOverheadBuilder - demand all elements for scalarization if the extraction index is unknown / out of bounds"
Revert ScalarizationOverheadBuilder sequence from D134605 - when accumulating extraction costs by Type (instead of specific Value), we are not distinguishing enough when they are coming from the same source or not, and we always just count the cost once. This needs addressing before we can use getScalarizationOverhead properly.
Instead of accumulating all extraction costs separately and then adjusting for repeated subvector extractions, this patch collects all the extractions and then converts to calls to getScalarizationOverhead to improve the accuracy of the costs.
I'm not entirely satisfied with the getExtractWithExtendCost handling yet - this still just adds all the getExtractWithExtendCost costs together - it really needs to be replaced with a "getScalarizationOverheadWithExtend", but that will require further refactoring first.
This replaces my initial attempt in D124769.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134605
SimplifyCFG folds
bool foo() {
if (cond1) return false;
if (cond2) return false;
return true;
}
as
bool foo() {
if (cond1 | cond2) return false
return true;
}
'cond2' is called 'bonus insts' in branch folding since they introduce overhead
since the original CFG could do early exit but the folded CFG always executes
them. SimplifyCFG calculates the costs of 'bonus insts' of a folding a BB into
its predecessor BB which shares the destination. If it is below bonus-inst-threshold,
SimplifyCFG will fold that BB into its predecessor and cond2 will always be executed.
When SimplifyCFG calculates the cost of 'bonus insts', it only consider 'bonus' insts
in the current BB to be considered for folding. This causes issue for unrolled loops
which share destinations, e.g.
bool foo(int *a) {
for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++)
if (a[i] > 0) return false;
return true;
}
After unrolling, it becomes
bool foo(int *a) {
if(a[0]>0) return false
if(a[1]>0) return false;
//...
if(a[31]>0) return false;
return true;
}
SimplifyCFG will merge each BB with its predecessor BB,
and ends up with 32 'bonus insts' which are always executed, which
is much slower than the original CFG.
The root cause is that SimplifyCFG does not consider the
accumulated cost of 'bonus insts' which are folded from
different BB's.
This patch fixes that by introducing a ValueMap to track
costs of 'bonus insts' coming from different BB's into
the same BB, and cuts off if the accumulated cost
exceeds a threshold.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich, Florian Hahn, Nikita Popov, Matt Arsenault
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132408
This was originally part of D133788. There are no visible
regressions. All of the diffs show a large unsigned constant
becoming a small negative constant. This should be better
for analysis (and slightly less compile-time) and codegen.
Most of our cost model tables have been created assuming cost kind == recip-throughput. But we're starting to see passes wanting to get accurate costs for the other kinds as well. Some of these can be determined procedurally (e.g. codesize by default could just be the split count after type legalization), but others are going to need to be handled in cost tables - this is especially true for x86 which has so many ISA combinations.
I've created a 'CostKindCosts' struct which can hold cost values for the 4 cost kinds, defaulting to -1U for unknown cost, this can be used with the existing CostTblEntryT/CostTableLookup template code. I've also added a [TargetCostKind] accessor to make it much easier to look up individual <Optional> costs.
This just changes the ISD::SELECT costs to check the effect (and also to check that the ISD::SETCC are correctly handled for default/None cost kinds) - the plan would be to slowly extend this and move the CostKindTblEntry type somewhere generic to allow other targets to use it once its matured.
I'm also going to resurrect D103695 so that it can help with latency/codesize/sizelatency coverage testing.
For sizelatency - IIRC the definition was vague to let it be target specific - I've tried to use typical uop counts so they're comparable to MicroOpBufferSize etc.
REAPPLIED: Added early out to prevent getCmpSelInstrCost being used for anything but generic integer/float scalar/vector types - getTypeLegalizationCost can't handle the "exotic" TypeID enums that some passes attempt to get a costs for (aggregates etc.).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132216
Most of our cost model tables have been created assuming cost kind == recip-throughput. But we're starting to see passes wanting to get accurate costs for the other kinds as well. Some of these can be determined procedurally (e.g. codesize by default could just be the split count after type legalization), but others are going to need to be handled in cost tables - this is especially true for x86 which has so many ISA combinations.
I've created a 'CostKindCosts' struct which can hold cost values for the 4 cost kinds, defaulting to -1U for unknown cost, this can be used with the existing CostTblEntryT/CostTableLookup template code. I've also added a [TargetCostKind] accessor to make it much easier to look up individual <Optional> costs.
This just changes the ISD::SELECT costs to check the effect (and also to check that the ISD::SETCC are correctly handled for default/None cost kinds) - the plan would be to slowly extend this and move the CostKindTblEntry type somewhere generic to allow other targets to use it once its matured.
I'm also going to resurrect D103695 so that it can help with latency/codesize/sizelatency coverage testing.
For sizelatency - IIRC the definition was vague to let it be target specific - I've tried to use typical uop counts so they're comparable to MicroOpBufferSize etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132216
Don't demand low order bits from the LHS of an Add if:
- they are not demanded in the result, and
- they are known to be zero in the RHS, so they can't possibly
overflow and affect higher bit positions
This is intended to avoid a regression from a future patch to change
the order of canonicalization of ADD and AND.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130075
If computeKnownBits encounters a phi node, and we fail to determine any known bits through direct analysis, see if the incoming value is part of a branch condition feeding the phi.
Handle cases where icmp(IncomingValue PRED Constant) is driving a branch instruction feeding that phi node - at the moment this only handles EQ/ULT/ULE predicate cases as they are the most straightforward to handle and most likely for branch-loop 'max upper bound' cases - we can extend this if/when necessary.
I investigated a more general icmp(LHS PRED RHS) KnownBits system, but the hard limits we put on value tracking depth through phi nodes meant that we were mainly catching constants anyhow.
Fixes the pointless vectorization in PR38280 / Issue #37628 (excessive unrolling still needs handling though)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131838
We call tail-call-elim near the beginning of the pipeline,
but that is too early to annotate calls that get added later.
In the motivating case from issue #47852, the missing 'tail'
on memset leads to sub-optimal codegen.
I experimented with removing the early instance of
tail-call-elim instead of just adding another pass, but that
appears to be slightly worse for compile-time:
+0.15% vs. +0.08% time.
"tailcall" shows adding the pass; "tailcall2" shows moving
the pass to later, then adding the original early pass back
(so 1596886802 is functionally equivalent to 180b0439dc ):
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/index.php?config=NewPM-O3&stat=instructions&remote=rotateright
Note that there was an effort to split the tail call functionality
into 2 passes - that could help reduce compile-time if we find
that this change costs more in compile-time than expected based
on the preliminary testing:
D60031
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130374
