ELF-based platforms currently support defining multiple static
initializer table sections with differing priorities, for example
.init_array.0 or .init_array.100; the default .init_array corresponds
to a priority of 65535. When building a shared library or executable,
the system linker normally sorts these sections and combines them into
a single .init_array section. This change adds the capability to
recognize ELF static initializers with priorities other than the
default, and to properly sort them by priority, to Orc and the Orc
runtime.
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127056
This change enables integrating orc::LLJIT with the ORCv2
platforms (MachOPlatform and ELFNixPlatform) and the compiler-rt orc
runtime. Changes include:
- Adding SPS wrapper functions for the orc runtime's dlfcn emulation
functions, allowing initialization and deinitialization to be invoked
by LLJIT.
- Changing the LLJIT code generation default to add UseInitArray so
that .init_array constructors are generated for ELF platforms.
- Integrating the ORCv2 Platforms into lli, and adding a
PlatformSupport implementation to the LLJIT instance used by lli which
implements initialization and deinitialization by calling the new
wrapper functions in the runtime.
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126492
There are differences in handling of stat64/statfs64 calls by sanitizers between Linux and macOS. Versions of macOS starting with 10.6 drop the stat64/statfs64 APIs completely, relying on the linker to redirect stat/statfs to the appropriate 64 bit versions. Emitting variables needed by sanitizers is thus controlled by convoluted sets of conditions, involving Linux, IOS, macOS and Android, sprinkled around files.
This change adresses it, allowing to specify presence/absence of stat64/statfs64 for each platform, in a single location. Also, it adresses the Android case which handles stat64, but not statfs64.
Adding Vitaly as a reviewer since he seems to be actively working on sanitizers, perhaps can comment on the Android bit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127343
Supports on Android but also from Linux 5.17
Reviewers: vitalybuka, eugenis
Reviewed-By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127326
On FreeBSD AArch64 safestack needs to use __syscall to handle 64 bit arguments
Reviewed by: MaskRay, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125901
The stack pointer is stored in the second slot in the jump buffer on
AArch64. Use the correct slot value to read this rather than the
following register.
Reviewed by: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125762
As with 64 bit x86 use an offset in middle of the address space scaled up
to work with the full 48 bit space.
Reviewed by: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125757
This reverts commit b37d84aa8d59dde2fae7388da5101bf471ec3434.
This broke aarch64 asan builders for fuchsia. I accidentally changed the allocator
settings for fuchsia on aarch64 because the new asan allocator settings use:
```
// AArch64/SANITIZER_CAN_USE_ALLOCATOR64 is only for 42-bit VMA
// so no need to different values for different VMA.
const uptr kAllocatorSpace = 0x10000000000ULL;
const uptr kAllocatorSize = 0x10000000000ULL; // 3T.
typedef DefaultSizeClassMap SizeClassMap;
```
rather than reaching the final `#else` which would use fuchsia's lsan config.
I believe this should've been fixed with 4b15e665f8d99d3b67b30e615544279654392745
which landed after this initial patch, but I reverted too early before I
saw the builder turn green again.
This updates existing asan allocator settings to use the same allocator settings as what lsan uses for platforms where they already match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126927
This way downstream tools that read sanitizer output can differentiate between OOM errors
reported by sanitizers from other sanitizer errors.
Changes:
- Introduce ErrorIsOOM for checking if a platform-specific error code from an "mmap" is an OOM err.
- Add ReportOOMError which just prepends this error message to the start of a Report call.
- Replace some Reports for OOMs with calls to ReportOOMError.
- Update necessary tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127161
Repalce the fixed buffer in SymbolizerProcess with InternalScopedString,
and simply append to it when reading data.
Fixes#55460
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, leonardchan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126580
ARM EHABI isn't signalled by any specific compiler builtin define,
but is implied by the lack of defines specifying any other
exception handling mechanism, `__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__` or
`__ARM_DWARF_EH__`.
As Windows SEH also can be used for unwinding, check for the
`__SEH__` define too, in the same way.
This is the same change as 4a3722a2c3dff1fe885cc38bf43d3c095c9851e7 /
D126866, applied on the compiler-rt builtins gcc_personality_v0
function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126863
This interceptor only addresses writes to inputs. Reads of inputs are not checked.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126851
The script uses llvm-link to link LLVM bitcode files.
5426da8ffa4a6d55adab21026ce6ebe8f1cc6ef2 used -DLLVM_DISABLE_ASSEMBLY_FILES=ON
to ignore object files compiled from lib/Support/BLAKE3/*.S.
A better approach (which fits Bazel better) is to ignore non-bitcode files.
Reviewed By: akyrtzi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126728
sanitizer_intercept_overriders.h might override SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_CRYPT_R to
be undefined. There's no need to require crypt.h in that case.
(The motivation is that crypt() moved from glibc into its own package at some
point, which makes intercepting it and building with a single sysroot that
supports both pre-bullseye and post-bullseye a bit hairy.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126696
Don't build atomic fetch nand libcall functions when the required
compiler builtin isn't available. Without this compiler-rt can't be
built with LLVM 13 or earlier.
Not building the libcall functions isn't optimal, but aligns with the
usecase in FreeBSD where compiler-rt from LLVM 14 is built with an LLVM
13 clang and no LLVM 14 clang is built.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126710
Previous couple commits replaced SANITIZER_MAC with SANITIZER_APPLE in bulk.
This change will prompt anyone still trying to use SANITIZER_MAC to rename.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126577
GCC recently started setting constructor priority on init_have_lse_atomics [1]
to avoid undefined initialization order with respect to other initializers,
causing accidental use of ll/sc intrinsics on targets where this was not
intended (which presents a minor performance problem as well as a
compatibility problem for users wanting to use the rr debugger). I initially
thought compiler-rt does not have the same issue as libgcc, since it looks
like we're already setting init priority on the constructor.
Unfortuantely, it does not appear that the HAVE_INIT_PRIORITY check is ever
performed anyway, so despite appearances the init priority was not actually
applied. Fix that by applying the init priority unconditionally. It has been
supported in clang ever since it was first introduced and in any case for
more than 14 years in both gcc and clang. MSVC is already excluded from this
code path and we're already using constructors with init priority elsewhere
in compiler-rt without additional check (though mostly in the sanitizer
runtime, which may have more narrow target support). Regardless, I believe
that for our supported compilers, if they support the constructor attribute,
they should also support init priorities.
While we're here, change the init priority from 101, which is the highest
priority for end user applications, to instead use one of the priority levels
reserved for implementations (1-100; lower integers are higher priority).
GCC ended up using `90`, so this commit aligns the value in compiler-rt
to the same value to ensure that there are no subtle initialization order
differences between libgcc and compiler-rt.
[1] 75c4e4909a
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126424
Sanitizers ignore flag allocator_may_return_null=1 in strndup() calls.
When OOM is emulated, this causes to the unexpected crash.
Committed by pgousseau on behalf of "Kostyantyn Melnik, kmnls.kmnls@gmail.com"
Reviewed by: pgousseau
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126452
This is a follow up to [Sanitizers][Darwin] Rename Apple macro SANITIZER_MAC -> SANITIZER_APPLE (D125816)
Performed a global search/replace as in title against LLVM sources
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126263
While attempting to get the 64-bit lsan allocator working for Fuchsia, I
noticed this function would incorrectly return false for pointers returned
by the 64-bit allocator. On AArch64, this function attempts to get the VMA
size dynamically by counting the number of leading zeros from the function
frame address. This will fail if the frame address is significantly below an
allocated pointer (that is, the frame address has more leading zeros than an
allocated pointer). This is possible on Fuchsia and linux (when not called
from the initial thread stack).
It seems the intended use of this function is to speed up pointer scanning by
filtering out addresses that user code might not be able to access. Other
platforms this check is done on seem to hardcode the VMA size/shift, so it
seems appropriate to do this for aarch64 as well. This implies pointers on
aarch64 where the VMA size is <64 will pass through, but bad pointers will
still be caught by subsequent scan checks.
This patch also renames the function to something more fitting of what it's
trying to do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123814
Initial introduction of the new macro before obsoleting the old one - the old name was really confusing.
Also moved SANITIZER_WATCHOS and SANITIZER_TVOS definitions under common #if defined(__APPLE__) block
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125816
The spinlock requires that lock-free operations are available;
otherwise, the implementation just calls itself. As discussed in
D120026.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123080
