13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Mayer
0593ce5f0b [MC] Add 'G' to augmentation string for MTE instrumented functions
This was agreed on in
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141345.html

The thread proposed two options
* add a character to augmentation string and handle in libuwind
* use a separate personality function.

It was determined that this is the simpler and better option.

This is part of ARM's Aarch64 ABI:
https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aadwarf64/aadwarf64.rst#id22

The next step after this is teaching libunwind to untag when this
augmentation character is set.

Reviewed By: MaskRay, eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127007
2022-06-08 12:36:32 -07:00
Matt Arsenault
cc5a1b3dd9 llvm-reduce: Add cloning of target MachineFunctionInfo
MIR support is totally unusable for AMDGPU without this, since the set
of reserved registers is set from fields here.

Add a clone method to MachineFunctionInfo. This is a subtle variant of
the copy constructor that is required if there are any MIR constructs
that use pointers. Specifically, at minimum fields that reference
MachineBasicBlocks or the MachineFunction need to be adjusted to the
values in the new function.
2022-06-07 10:14:48 -04:00
Momchil Velikov
d0ea42a7c1 [AArch64] Async unwind - function epilogues
Reviewed By: MaskRay, chill

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112330
2022-04-12 16:50:50 +01:00
Momchil Velikov
63c9aca12a Revert "[AArch64] Async unwind - function epilogues"
This reverts commit 74319d67943a4fbef36e81f54273549ce4962f84.

It causes test failures that look like infinite loop in asan/hwasan
unwinding.
2022-03-02 15:01:57 +00:00
Momchil Velikov
74319d6794 [AArch64] Async unwind - function epilogues
Counterpart of https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411 this change makes the
unwind information instruction precise in function epilogues.

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112330
2022-03-02 13:15:11 +00:00
Momchil Velikov
25e92920c9 [AArch64] Async unwind - helper functions to decide on CFI emission
Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112327
2022-02-24 18:16:50 +00:00
Bill Wendling
a5bbc6ef99 [NFC] Remove unnecessary "#include"s from header files 2022-02-23 01:20:48 -08:00
Martin Storsjö
42f74e8249 [llvm] Rename StringRef _lower() method calls to _insensitive()
This is a mechanical change. This actually also renames the
similarly named methods in the SmallString class, however these
methods don't seem to be used outside of the llvm subproject, so
this doesn't break building of the rest of the monorepo.
2021-06-25 00:22:01 +03:00
Momchil Velikov
a88c722e68 [AArch64] PAC/BTI code generation for LLVM generated functions
PAC/BTI-related codegen in the AArch64 backend is controlled by a set
of LLVM IR function attributes, added to the function by Clang, based
on command-line options and GCC-style function attributes. However,
functions, generated in the LLVM middle end (for example,
asan.module.ctor or __llvm_gcov_write_out) do not get any attributes
and the backend incorrectly does not do any PAC/BTI code generation.

This patch record the default state of PAC/BTI codegen in a set of
LLVM IR module-level attributes, based on command-line options:

* "sign-return-address", with non-zero value means generate code to
  sign return addresses (PAC-RET), zero value means disable PAC-RET.

* "sign-return-address-all", with non-zero value means enable PAC-RET
  for all functions, zero value means enable PAC-RET only for
  functions, which spill LR.

* "sign-return-address-with-bkey", with non-zero value means use B-key
  for signing, zero value mean use A-key.

This set of attributes are always added for AArch64 targets (as
opposed, for example, to interpreting a missing attribute as having a
value 0) in order to be able to check for conflicts when combining
module attributed during LTO.

Module-level attributes are overridden by function level attributes.
All the decision making about whether to not to generate PAC and/or
BTI code is factored out into AArch64FunctionInfo, there shouldn't be
any places left, other than AArch64FunctionInfo, which directly
examine PAC/BTI attributes, except AArch64AsmPrinter.cpp, which
is/will-be handled by a separate patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649
2020-09-25 11:47:14 +01:00
Jessica Paquette
66037b84cf MachineFunctionInfo for AArch64 in MIR
Starting with hasRedZone adding MachineFunctionInfo to be put in the YAML for MIR files.

Split out of: D78062

Based on implementation for MachineFunctionInfo for WebAssembly

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78173

Patch by Andrew Litteken! (AndrewLitteken)
2020-04-17 15:16:59 -07:00
Tim Northover
cc08e1fe1b AArch64/ARM64: remove AArch64 from tree prior to renaming ARM64.
I'm doing this in two phases for a better "git blame" record. This
commit removes the previous AArch64 backend and redirects all
functionality to ARM64. It also deduplicates test-lines and removes
orphaned AArch64 tests.

The next step will be "git mv ARM64 AArch64" and rewire most of the
tests.

Hopefully LLVM is still functional, though it would be even better if
no-one ever had to care because the rename happens straight
afterwards.

llvm-svn: 209576
2014-05-24 12:42:26 +00:00
Tim Northover
75f436c4ea AArch64: add block comments where missing
Only comments affected. No code change at all.

llvm-svn: 175169
2013-02-14 16:17:01 +00:00
Tim Northover
e0e3aefdd3 Add AArch64 as an experimental target.
This patch adds support for AArch64 (ARM's 64-bit architecture) to
LLVM in the "experimental" category. Currently, it won't be built
unless requested explicitly.

This initial commit should have support for:
    + Assembly of all scalar (i.e. non-NEON, non-Crypto) instructions
      (except the late addition CRC instructions).
    + CodeGen features required for C++03 and C99.
    + Compilation for the "small" memory model: code+static data <
      4GB.
    + Absolute and position-independent code.
    + GNU-style (i.e. "__thread") TLS.
    + Debugging information.

The principal omission, currently, is performance tuning.

This patch excludes the NEON support also reviewed due to an outbreak of
batshit insanity in our legal department. That will be committed soon bringing
the changes to precisely what has been approved.

Further reviews would be gratefully received.

llvm-svn: 174054
2013-01-31 12:12:40 +00:00