MIR support is totally unusable for AMDGPU without this, since the set
of reserved registers is set from fields here.
Add a clone method to MachineFunctionInfo. This is a subtle variant of
the copy constructor that is required if there are any MIR constructs
that use pointers. Specifically, at minimum fields that reference
MachineBasicBlocks or the MachineFunction need to be adjusted to the
values in the new function.
This patch addresses several alignment issues in the stack frame when
RVV objects are taken into account.
One bug is that the RVV stack was never guaranteed to keep the alignment
of the stack *as a whole*. We must maintain a 16-byte aligned stack at
all times, especially when calling other functions. With the standard V
extension, this is conveniently happening since VLEN is at least 128 and
always 16-byte aligned. However, we support Zvl64b which does not
guarantee this. To fix this, the RVV stack size is rounded up to be
aligned to 16 bytes. This in practice generally makes us allocate a
stack sized at least 2*VLEN in size, and a multiple of 2.
|------------------------------| -- <-- FP
| 8-byte callee-save | | |
|------------------------------| | |
| one VLENB-sized RVV object | | |
|------------------------------| | |
| 8-byte local variable | | |
|------------------------------| -- <-- SP (must be aligned to 16)
In the example above, with Zvl64b we are decrementing SP by 12 bytes
which does not leave SP correctly aligned. We therefore introduce an
extra VLENB-sized amount used for alignment. This would therefore ensure
the total stack size was 16 bytes (48 for Zvl128b, 80 for Zvl256b, etc):
|------------------------------| -- <-- FP
| 8-byte callee-save | | |
|------------------------------| | |
| one VLENB-sized padding obj | | |
| one VLENB-sized RVV object | | |
|------------------------------| | |
| 8-byte local variable | | |
|------------------------------| -- <-- SP
A new RVV invariant has been introduced in this patch, which is that the
base of the RVV stack itself is now always aligned to 16 bytes, not 8 as
before. This keeps us more in line with the scalar stack and should be
easier to reason about. The calculation of the RVV padding has thus
changed to be the amount required to align the scalar local variable
section to the RVV section's alignment. This amount is further rounded
up when setting up the initial stack to keep everything aligned:
|------------------------------| -- <-- FP
| 8-byte callee-save |
|------------------------------|
| |
| RVV objects |
| (aligned to at least 16) |
| |
|------------------------------|
| RVV padding of 8 bytes |
|------------------------------|
| 8-byte local variable |
|------------------------------| -- <-- SP
In the example above, it's clear that we need 8 bytes of padding to keep
the RVV section aligned to 16 when using SP. But to keep SP *itself*
aligned to 16 we can't decrement the initial stack pointer by 24 - we
have to round up to 32.
With the RVV section correctly aligned, the second bug fixed by
this patch is that RVV objects themselves are now correctly aligned. We
were previously only guaranteeing an alignment of 8 bytes, even if they
required a higher alignment. This is relatively simple and in practice
we see more rounding up of VLEN amounts to account for alignment in
between objects:
|------------------------------|
| RVV object (aligned to 16) |
|------------------------------|
| no padding necessary |
|------------------------------|
| 2*VLENB RVV object (align 16)|
|------------------------------|
| VLENB alignment padding |
|------------------------------|
| RVV object (align 32) |
|------------------------------|
| 3*VLENB alignment padding |
|------------------------------|
| VLENB RVV object (align 32) |
|------------------------------| -- <-- base of RVV section
Note that a lot of the regressions in codegen owing to the new alignment
rules are correct but actually only strictly necessary for Zvl64b (and
Zvl32b but that's not really supported). I plan a follow-up patch to
take the known VLEN into account when padding for alignment.
Reviewed By: StephenFan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125787
RISCVMachineFunctionInfo has some fields like VarArgsFrameIndex and
VarArgsSaveSize are calculated at ISel lowering stage, those info are
not contained in MIR files, that cause test cases rely on those field
can't not reproduce correctly by MIR dump files.
This patch adding the MIR read/write for those fields.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123178
It has to save all caller-saved registers before a call in the handler.
So don't emit a call that save/restore registers.
Reviewed By: simoncook, luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100532
In D97111 we changed the RVV frame layout when using sp or bp to address
the stack slots so we could address the emergency stack slot. The idea
is to put the RVV objects as far as possible (in offset terms) from the
frame reference register (sp / fp / bp).
When using fp this happens naturally because the RVV objects are already
the top of the stack and due to the constraints of RVV (VLENB being a
power of two >= 128) the stack remains aligned. The rest of this summary
does not apply to this case.
When using sp / bp we need to skip the non-RVV stack slots. The size of
the the non-RVV objects is computed subtracting the callee saved
register size (whose computation is added in D97111 itself) to the total
size of the stack (which does not account for RVV stack slots). However,
when doing so we round to 16 bytes when computing that size and we end
emitting a smaller offset that may belong to a scalar stack slot (see
D98801). So this change removes that rounding.
Also, because we want the RVV objects be between the non-RVV stack slots
and the callee-saved register slots, we need to make sure the RVV
objects are properly aligned to 8 bytes. Adding a padding of 8 would
render the stack unaligned. So when allocating space for RVV (only when
we don't use fp) we need to have extra padding that preserves the stack
alignment. This way we can round to 8 bytes the offset that skips the
non-RVV objects and we do not misalign the whole stack in the way. In
some circumstances this means that the RVV objects may have padding
before (=lower offsets from sp/bp) and after (before the CSR stack
slots).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98802
This patch change the rvv frame layout that proposed in D94465. In patch D94465, In the eliminateFrameIndex function,
to eliminate the rvv frame index, create temp virtual register is needed. This virtual register should be scavenged by class
RegsiterScavenger. If the machine function has other unused registers, there is no problem. But if there isn't unused registers,
we need a emergency spill slot. Because of the emergency spill slot belongs to the scalar local variables field, to access emergency
spill slot, we need a temp virtual register again. This makes the compiler report the "Incomplete scavenging after 2nd pass" error.
So I change the rvv frame layout as follows:
```
|--------------------------------------|
| arguments passed on the stack |
|--------------------------------------|<--- fp
| callee saved registers |
|--------------------------------------|
| rvv vector objects(local variables |
| and outgoing arguments |
|--------------------------------------|
| realignment field |
|--------------------------------------|
| scalar local variable(also contains|
| emergency spill slot) |
|--------------------------------------|<--- bp
| variable-sized local variables |
|--------------------------------------|<--- sp
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97111
This patch proposes how to deal with RISC-V vector frame objects. The
layout of RISC-V vector frame will look like
|---------------------------------|
| scalar callee-saved registers |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
| RVV local variables && |
| RVV outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------| <- end of frame (sp)
If there is realignment or variable length array in the stack, we will use
frame pointer to access fixed objects and stack pointer to access
non-fixed objects.
|---------------------------------| <- frame pointer (fp)
| scalar callee-saved registers |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|---------------------------------|
| ///// realignment ///// |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
| RVV local variables && |
| RVV outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------| <- end of frame (sp)
If there are both realignment and variable length array in the stack, we
will use frame pointer to access fixed objects and base pointer to access
non-fixed objects.
|---------------------------------| <- frame pointer (fp)
| scalar callee-saved registers |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|---------------------------------|
| ///// realignment ///// |
|---------------------------------| <- base pointer (bp)
| RVV local variables && |
| RVV outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
| /////////////////////////////// |
| variable length array |
| /////////////////////////////// |
|---------------------------------| <- end of frame (sp)
| scalar outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
In this version, we do not save the addresses of RVV objects in the
stack. We access them directly through the polynomial expression
(a x VLENB + b). We do not reserve frame pointer when there is any RVV
object in the stack. So, we also access the scalar frame objects through the
polynomial expression (a x VLENB + b) if the access across RVV stack
area.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94465
This patch adds the support required for using the __riscv_save and
__riscv_restore libcalls to implement a size-optimization for prologue
and epilogue code, whereby the spill and restore code of callee-saved
registers is implemented by common functions to reduce code duplication.
Logic is also included to ensure that if both this optimization and
shrink wrapping are enabled then the prologue and epilogue code can be
safely inserted into the basic blocks chosen by shrink wrapping.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62686
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
fadd.d is required in order to force floating point registers to be used in
test code, as parameters are passed in integer registers in the soft float
ABI.
Much of this patch is concerned with support for passing f64 on RV32D with a
soft-float ABI. Similar to Mips, introduce pseudoinstructions to build an f64
out of a pair of i32 and to split an f64 to a pair of i32. BUILD_PAIR and
EXTRACT_ELEMENT can't be used, as a BITCAST to i64 would be necessary, but i64
is not a legal type.
llvm-svn: 329871
Includes support for expanding va_copy. Also adds support for using 'aligned'
registers when necessary for vararg calls, and ensure the frame pointer always
points to the bottom of the vararg spill region. This is necessary to ensure
that the saved return address and stack pointer are always available at fixed
known offsets of the frame pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40805
llvm-svn: 322215
