This reverts commit 83a798d4b0e17ac41d5430f1290d3661343eee1e.
As discussed in D120714 with @thakis, the patch added unneeded complexity
without noticeable benefits.
Place PersistentId declaration under #if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS to
reduce memory usage when it is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120714
Re-commit of 32e8b550e5439c7e4aafa73894faffd5f25d0d05
This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.
The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes
A correct unwind info could look like:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
`-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.
Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
It caused builds to assert with:
(StackSize == 0 && "We already have the CFA offset!"),
function generateCompactUnwindEncoding, file AArch64AsmBackend.cpp, line 624.
when targeting iOS. See comment on the code review for reproducer.
> This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
> DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.
>
> The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
> function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
> but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
> at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:
>
> ```
> stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
> mov x29, sp
> .cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
> ...
> ```
>
> after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
> the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes
>
> A correct unwind info could look like:
> ```
> stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> mov x29, sp
> .cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
> ...
> ```
>
> Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
> sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
> goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
> `-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.
>
> Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
This reverts commit 32e8b550e5439c7e4aafa73894faffd5f25d0d05.
This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.
The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes
A correct unwind info could look like:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
`-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.
Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
We would like to start pushing -mcpu=generic towards enabling the set of
features that improves performance for some CPUs, without hurting any
others. A blend of the performance options hopefully beneficial to all
CPUs. The largest part of that is enabling in-order scheduling using the
Cortex-A55 schedule model. This is similar to the Arm backend change
from eecb353d0e25ba which made -mcpu=generic perform in-order scheduling
using the cortex-a8 schedule model.
The idea is that in-order cpu's require the most help in instruction
scheduling, whereas out-of-order cpus can for the most part out-of-order
schedule around different codegen. Our benchmarking suggests that
hypothesis holds. When running on an in-order core this improved
performance by 3.8% geomean on a set of DSP workloads, 2% geomean on
some other embedded benchmark and between 1% and 1.8% on a set of
singlecore and multicore workloads, all running on a Cortex-A55 cluster.
On an out-of-order cpu the results are a lot more noisy but show flat
performance or an improvement. On the set of DSP and embedded
benchmarks, run on a Cortex-A78 there was a very noisy 1% speed
improvement. Using the most detailed results I could find, SPEC2006 runs
on a Neoverse N1 show a small increase in instruction count (+0.127%),
but a decrease in cycle counts (-0.155%, on average). The instruction
count is very low noise, the cycle count is more noisy with a 0.15%
decrease not being significant. SPEC2k17 shows a small decrease (-0.2%)
in instruction count leading to a -0.296% decrease in cycle count. These
results are within noise margins but tend to show a small improvement in
general.
When specifying an Apple target, clang will set "-target-cpu apple-a7"
on the command line, so should not be affected by this change when
running from clang. This also doesn't enable more runtime unrolling like
-mcpu=cortex-a55 does, only changing the schedule used.
A lot of existing tests have updated. This is a summary of the important
differences:
- Most changes are the same instructions in a different order.
- Sometimes this leads to very minor inefficiencies, such as requiring
an extra mov to move variables into r0/v0 for the return value of a test
function.
- misched-fusion.ll was no longer fusing the pairs of instructions it
should, as per D110561. I've changed the schedule used in the test
for now.
- neon-mla-mls.ll now uses "mul; sub" as opposed to "neg; mla" due to
the different latencies. This seems fine to me.
- Some SVE tests do not always remove movprfx where they did before due
to different register allocation giving different destructive forms.
- The tests argument-blocks-array-of-struct.ll and arm64-windows-calls.ll
produce two LDR where they previously produced an LDP due to
store-pair-suppress kicking in.
- arm64-ldp.ll and arm64-neon-copy.ll are missing pre/postinc on LPD.
- Some tests such as arm64-neon-mul-div.ll and
ragreedy-local-interval-cost.ll have more, less or just different
spilling.
- In aarch64_generated_funcs.ll.generated.expected one part of the
function is no longer outlined. Interestingly if I switch this to use
any other scheduled even less is outlined.
Some of these are expected to happen, such as differences in outlining
or register spilling. There will be places where these result in worse
codegen, places where they are better, with the SPEC instruction counts
suggesting it is not a decrease overall, on average.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110830
Add a comment when there is a shifted value,
add x9, x0, #291, lsl #12 ; =1191936
but not when the immediate value is unshifted,
subs x9, x0, #256 ; =256
when the comment adds nothing additional to the reader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107196
When clamping the index for a memory access to a stacked vector we must
take into account the entire type being accessed, not just assume that
we are accessing only a single element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105016
When trying to clamp a constant index into a scalable vector we can
test if the index is less than the minimum number of elements in the
vector. If so, we can simply return the index because we know it is
guaranteed to fit inside the vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100639
This function is needed for when it is necessary to split the subvector
operand of an llvm.experimental.vector.insert call. Splitting the
subvector operand means performing two insertions: one inserting the
lower part of the split subvector into the destination vector, and
another for inserting the upper part.
Through experimenting, it seems quite rare to need split the subvector
operand, but this is necessary to avoid assertion errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92760
