This patch improves the codegen of extractelement and insertelement for vector
containing 8 elements. Before, a dag combine transformation was generating a
sequence of 8 select/cmp.
This patch changes the upper limit for this transformation and the movrel
instruction will eventually be used instead. Extractlement/insertelement for
vectors containing less than 8 elements are unchanged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126389
Previously SIFoldOperands::foldInstOperand would only fold a
non-inlinable immediate into a single user, so as not to increase code
size by adding the same 32-bit literal operand to many instructions.
This patch removes that restriction, so that a non-inlinable immediate
will be folded into any number of users. The rationale is:
- It reduces the number of registers used for holding constant values,
which might increase occupancy. (On the other hand, many of these
registers are SGPRs which no longer affect occupancy on GFX10+.)
- It reduces ALU stalls between the instruction that loads a constant
into a register, and the instruction that uses it.
- The above benefits are expected to outweigh any increase in code size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114643
This reverts commit 640beb38e7710b939b3cfb3f4c54accc694b1d30.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ifc167b3c2dae7a65920676f22a97ba76485f3456
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116686
Change-Id: I1abf49b74a7e2ba0e0205f747a4154a468b9d7f2
This reverts commit 859ebca744e634dcc89a2294ffa41574f947bd62.
The change contained many unrelated changes and e.g. restored
unit test failes for the old lld port.
This reverts commit 640beb38e7710b939b3cfb3f4c54accc694b1d30.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
Using a BufferSize of one for memory ProcResources will result in better
ILP since it more accurately models the dependencies between memory ops
and their consumers on an in-order processor. After this change, the
scheduler will treat the data edges from loads as blocking so that
stalls are guaranteed when waiting for data to be retreaved from memory.
Since we don't actually track waitcnt here, this should do a better job
at modeling their behavior.
Practically, this means that the scheduler will trigger the 'STALL'
heuristic more often.
This type of change needs to be evaluated experimentally. Preliminary
results are positive.
Fixes: SWDEV-282962
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114777
Description: This change enables the compare operations to be selected to SALU/VALU form
dependent of the SDNode divergence flag.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106079
This tends to increase code size but more importantly it reduces vgpr
usage, and could avoid costly readfirstlanes if the result needs to be
in an sgpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88245
Summary:
Add patterns to select s_cselect in the isel.
Handle more cases of implicit SCC accesses in si-fix-sgpr-copies
to allow new patterns to work.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Re-commit D81925 with a bugfix D82370.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82370
Summary:
Add patterns to select s_cselect in the isel.
Handle more cases of implicit SCC accesses in si-fix-sgpr-copies
to allow new patterns to work.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81925
It was set in total vector size while the idea was to limit
a number of instructions. Now it started to work with doubles
and thresholds needs to be updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80322
Even though series of cmd/cndmask can produce quite a lot of
code that is still better than a loop. In case of doubles we
would even produce two loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80032
SelectMOVRELOffset prevents peeling of a constant from an index
if final base could be negative. isBaseWithConstantOffset() succeeds
if a value is an "add" or "or" operator. In case of "or" it shall
be an add-like "or" which never changes a sign of the sum given a
non-negative offset. I.e. we can safely allow peeling if operator is
an "or".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79898
We can produce such vectors in the Promote Alloca pass,
but we are unable to use movrel to operate it and lower
via scratch. Making it legal makes SI_INDIRECT patterns
work.
There is more work to do in subsequent changes:
1. We initialize m0 twice to access each dword. It shall
be possible to only do it once and increment base register
number instead.
2. We also need v16i64/v16f64 but these first need to be
added to tablegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79808
Summary:
Incorrect code was generated when lowering insertelement operations
for vectors with 8 or 16 bit elements. The value being inserted was
not adjusted for the position of the element within the 32 bit word
and so only the low element within each 32 bit word could receive
the intended value.
Fixed by simply replicating the value to each element of a
congruent vector before the mask and or operation used to
update the intended element.
A number of affected LIT tests have been updated appropriately.
before the mask & or into the intended
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57588
llvm-svn: 352885
This allows to avoid scratch use or indirect VGPR addressing for
small vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54606
llvm-svn: 347231