16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Philip Reames
7d6e8f2a96 [slp] Delete dead scalar instructions feeding vectorized instructions
If we vectorize a e.g. store, we leave around a bunch of getelementptrs for the individual scalar stores which we removed. We can go ahead and delete them as well.

This is purely for test output quality and readability. It should have no effect in any sane pipeline.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122493
2022-03-28 20:10:13 -07:00
Philip Reames
48cc9287f5 Reapply "[SLP] Schedule only sub-graph of vectorizable instructions"" (try 3)
The original commit exposed several missing dependencies (e.g. latent bugs in SLP scheduling).  Most of these were fixed over the weekend and have had several days to bake.  The last was fixed this morning after being noticed in manual review of test changes yesterday.  See the review thread for links to each change.

Original commit message follows:

SLP currently schedules all instructions within a scheduling window which stretches from the first instruction potentially vectorized to the last. This window can include a very large number of unrelated instructions which are not being considered for vectorization. This change switches the code to only schedule the sub-graph consisting of the instructions being vectorized and their transitive users.

This has the effect of greatly reducing the amount of work performed in large basic blocks, and thus greatly improves compile time on degenerate examples. To understand the effects, I added some statistics (not planned for upstream contribution). Here's an illustration from my motivating example:

   Before this patch:

   704357 SLP                          - Number of calcDeps actions
   699021 SLP                          - Number of schedule calls
   5598 SLP                          - Number of ReSchedule actions
   59 SLP                          - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
   10084 SLP                          - Number of schedule resets
   8523 SLP                          - Number of vector instructions generated

   After this patch:

   102895 SLP                          - Number of calcDeps actions
   161916 SLP                          - Number of schedule calls
   5637 SLP                          - Number of ReSchedule actions
   55 SLP                          - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
   10083 SLP                          - Number of schedule resets
   8403 SLP                          - Number of vector instructions generated

I do want to highlight that there is a small difference in number of generated vector instructions. This example is hitting the bailout due to maximum window size, and the change in scheduling is slightly perturbing when and how we hit it. This can be seen in the RescheduleOnFail counter change. Given that, I think we can safely ignore.

The downside of this change can be seen in the large test diff. We group all vectorizable instructions together at the bottom of the scheduling region. This means that vector instructions can move quite far from their original point in code. While maybe undesirable, I don't see this as being a major problem as this pass is not intended to be a general scheduling pass.

For context, it's worth noting that the pre-scheduling that SLP does while building the vector tree is exactly the sub-graph scheduling implemented by this patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118538
2022-03-25 10:39:23 -07:00
Philip Reames
deae979a2c Revert "Reapply "[SLP] Schedule only sub-graph of vectorizable instructions"""
This reverts commit 738042711bc08cde9135873200b1d088e6cf11c3. A second, apparently separate, issue has been reported on the original review.
2022-03-03 11:35:34 -08:00
Philip Reames
738042711b Reapply "[SLP] Schedule only sub-graph of vectorizable instructions""
Root issue which triggered the revert was fixed in 689bab.  No changes in the reapplied patch.

Original commit message follows:

SLP currently schedules all instructions within a scheduling window which stretches from the first instr
uction potentially vectorized to the last. This window can include a very large number of unrelated instruct
ions which are not being considered for vectorization. This change switches the code to only schedule the su
b-graph consisting of the instructions being vectorized and their transitive users.

This has the effect of greatly reducing the amount of work performed in large basic blocks, and thus greatly improves compile time on degenerate examples. To understand the effects, I added some statistics (not planned for upstream contribution). Here's an illustration from my motivating example:

    Before this patch:

    704357 SLP                          - Number of calcDeps actions
     699021 SLP                          - Number of schedule calls
       5598 SLP                          - Number of ReSchedule actions
         59 SLP                          - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
      10084 SLP                          - Number of schedule resets
       8523 SLP                          - Number of vector instructions generated

    After this patch:

    102895 SLP                          - Number of calcDeps actions
     161916 SLP                          - Number of schedule calls
       5637 SLP                          - Number of ReSchedule actions
         55 SLP                          - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
      10083 SLP                          - Number of schedule resets
       8403 SLP                          - Number of vector instructions generated

I do want to highlight that there is a small difference in number of generated vector instructions. This example is hitting the bailout due to maximum window size, and the change in scheduling is slightly perturbing when and how we hit it. This can be seen in the RescheduleOnFail counter change. Given that, I think we can safely ignore.

The downside of this change can be seen in the large test diff. We group all vectorizable instructions together at the bottom of the scheduling region. This means that vector instructions can move quite far from their original point in code. While maybe undesirable, I don't see this as being a major problem as this pass is not intended to be a general scheduling pass.

For context, it's worth noting that the pre-scheduling that SLP does while building the vector tree is exactly the sub-graph scheduling implemented by this patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118538
2022-03-02 10:47:20 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
9c6250ee41 Revert "[SLP] Schedule only sub-graph of vectorizable instructions"
This reverts commit 0539a26d91a1b7c74022fa9cf33bd7faca87544d.

Causes a miscompile, see comments on D118538.

Required updating bottom-to-top-reorder.ll.
2022-03-01 17:31:16 -08:00
Philip Reames
0539a26d91 [SLP] Schedule only sub-graph of vectorizable instructions
SLP currently schedules all instructions within a scheduling window which stretches from the first instruction potentially vectorized to the last. This window can include a very large number of unrelated instructions which are not being considered for vectorization. This change switches the code to only schedule the sub-graph consisting of the instructions being vectorized and their transitive users.

This has the effect of greatly reducing the amount of work performed in large basic blocks, and thus greatly improves compile time on degenerate examples. To understand the effects, I added some statistics (not planned for upstream contribution). Here's an illustration from my motivating example:

Before this patch:

704357 SLP                          - Number of calcDeps actions
 699021 SLP                          - Number of schedule calls
   5598 SLP                          - Number of ReSchedule actions
     59 SLP                          - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
  10084 SLP                          - Number of schedule resets
   8523 SLP                          - Number of vector instructions generated

After this patch:

102895 SLP                          - Number of calcDeps actions
 161916 SLP                          - Number of schedule calls
   5637 SLP                          - Number of ReSchedule actions
     55 SLP                          - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
  10083 SLP                          - Number of schedule resets
   8403 SLP                          - Number of vector instructions generated

I do want to highlight that there is a small difference in number of generated vector instructions. This example is hitting the bailout due to maximum window size, and the change in scheduling is slightly perturbing when and how we hit it. This can be seen in the RescheduleOnFail counter change. Given that, I think we can safely ignore.

The downside of this change can be seen in the large test diff. We group all vectorizable instructions together at the bottom of the scheduling region. This means that vector instructions can move quite far from their original point in code. While maybe undesirable, I don't see this as being a major problem as this pass is not intended to be a general scheduling pass.

For context, it's worth noting that the pre-scheduling that SLP does while building the vector tree is exactly the sub-graph scheduling implemented by this patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118538
2022-02-22 10:15:55 -08:00
Philip Reames
15f7857412 [tests] Refresh autogen tests for SLP 2022-01-24 17:05:58 -08:00
Matt Arsenault
1d1234b2a4 OpaquePtr: Update more tests to use typed sret 2020-11-20 20:08:43 -05:00
Arthur Eubanks
691c086d15 [NewPM][BasicAA] basicaa -> basic-aa in Transforms/SLPVectorizer
Following https://reviews.llvm.org/D82607.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82681
2020-06-26 14:58:41 -07:00
Eric Christopher
cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Eric Christopher
2534592b9f Temporarily Revert "[X86][SLP] Enable SLP vectorization for 128-bit horizontal X86 instructions (add, sub)"
As this has broken the lto bootstrap build for 3 days and is
showing a significant regression on the Dither_benchmark results (from
the LLVM benchmark suite) -- specifically, on the
BENCHMARK_FLOYD_DITHER_128, BENCHMARK_FLOYD_DITHER_256, and
BENCHMARK_FLOYD_DITHER_512; the others are unchanged.  These have
regressed by about 28% on Skylake, 34% on Haswell, and over 40% on
Sandybridge.

This reverts commit r353923.

llvm-svn: 354434
2019-02-20 04:42:07 +00:00
Anton Afanasyev
ca9aff9353 [X86][SLP] Enable SLP vectorization for 128-bit horizontal X86 instructions (add, sub)
Try to use 64-bit SLP vectorization. In addition to horizontal instrs
this change triggers optimizations for partial vector operations (for instance,
using low halfs of 128-bit registers xmm0 and xmm1 to multiply <2 x float> by
<2 x float>).

Fixes llvm.org/PR32433

llvm-svn: 353923
2019-02-13 08:26:43 +00:00
Alexey Bataev
5b9a77d4ea [SLP] Fix PR35777: Incorrect handling of aggregate values.
Summary:
Fixes the bug with incorrect handling of InsertValue|InsertElement
instrucions in SLP vectorizer. Currently, we may use incorrect
ExtractElement instructions as the operands of the original
InsertValue|InsertElement instructions.

Reviewers: mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, spatel

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41767

llvm-svn: 321994
2018-01-08 14:43:06 +00:00
Alexey Bataev
e565ebcdad [SLP] Update test checks, NFC.
llvm-svn: 321870
2018-01-05 15:20:40 +00:00
Arch D. Robison
0e61034018 [SLPVectorizer] Extend SLP Vectorizer to deal with aggregates.
The refactoring portion part was done as r267748.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D14185

llvm-svn: 267899
2016-04-28 16:11:45 +00:00