This adds a C++20-version of `reverse_iterator` which doesn't SFINAE away the operators for use inside the classic STL algorithms. Pre-C++20 `_AlgRevIter` is just an alias for `reverse_iterator`.
Reviewed By: var-const, #libc
Spies: huixie90, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128864
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
The return type was specified incorrectly for proxy iterators that
define `reference` to be a class that implicitly converts to
`value_type`. `__iter_move` would end up returning an object of type
`reference` which would then implicitly convert to `value_type`; thus,
the function will return a `value_type&&` rvalue reference to the local
temporary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130197
In particular remove the ability to expel incomplete features from the
library at configure-time, since this can now be done through the
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL macro.
Also, never provide symbols related to incomplete features inside the
dylib, instead provide them in c++experimental.a (this changes the
symbols list, but not for any configuration that should have shipped).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128928
- create the headers (but not include them from `<algorithm>`);
- define the niebloid and its member functions with the right signatures
(as no-ops);
- make sure all the right headers are included that are required by each
algorithm's signature;
- update `CMakeLists.txt` and the module map;
- create the test files with the appropriate synopses.
The synopsis in `<algorithm>` is deliberately not updated because that
could be taken as a readiness signal. The new headers aren't included
from `<algorithm>` for the same reason.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129549
- checking that the algorithm supports predicates returning
a non-boolean type that's implicitly convertible to `bool`;
- checking that predicates and/or projections are invoked using
`std::invoke`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129414
implement `std::ranges::set_intersection` by reusing the classic `std::set_intersenction`
added unit tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129233
It is meant to be used in ranges algorithm tests.
It is much simplified version of C++23's tuple + zip_view.
Using std::swap would cause compilation failure and using `std::move` would not create the correct rvalue proxy which would result in copies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129099
Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844
This patch also adds a new optimization to `std::move`. It unwraps three `reverse_iterator`s if the wrapped iterator is a `contiguous_iterator` and the iterated type is trivially_movable. This allows us to simplify `ranges::move_backward` to a forward to `std::move` without any pessimization.
Reviewed By: var-const, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126616
This reverts commit 3583826bb52a7f129b55df043e29860aeab9906d.
Instead of marking the test unsupported for AIX, the choice is to bump the
timeout for CI as done in 76c7e1f2a8820b057de1a241422294bf25fdea2d and
222bd83d505728fca2bbe16cef8b93c321dd8c13
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127242
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
