This works similarly to the {thread/frame/process/target.script:...} feature - you write a summary string, part of which is
${var.script:someFuncName}
someFuncName is expected to be declared as
def someFuncName(SBValue,otherArgument) - essentially the same as a summary function
Since . -> [] are the only allowed separators, and % is used for custom formatting, .script: would not be a legitimate symbol anyway, which makes this non-ambiguous
llvm-svn: 220821
The way to do this is to write a synthetic child provider for your type, and have it vend the (optional) get_value function.
If get_value is defined, and it returns a valid SBValue, that SBValue's value (as in lldb_private::Value) will be used as the synthetic ValueObject's Value
The rationale for doing things this way is twofold:
- there are many possible ways to define a "value" (SBData, a Python number, ...) but SBValue seems general enough as a thing that stores a "value", so we just trade values that way and that keeps our currency trivial
- we could introduce a new level of layering (ValueObjectSyntheticValue), a new kind of formatter (synthetic value producer), but that would complicate the model (can I have a dynamic with no synthetic children but synthetic value? synthetic value with synthetic children but no dynamic?), and I really couldn't see much benefit to be reaped from this added complexity in the matrix
On the other hand, just defining a synthetic child provider with a get_value but returning no actual children is easy enough that it's not a significant road-block to adoption of this feature
Comes with a test case
llvm-svn: 219330
The test used to trigger an assertion failure "Cannot get layout of
forward declarations!", but it no longer fails when built with
Clang 3.4.1 (system compiler) or 3.5 from SVN on FreeBSD.
llvm.org/pr17231
llvm-svn: 218196
The test produces lines that start with "<word>: " which confuses the
buildbot log parser. Disable the test until either the test is fixed
or the buildbot can deal with the undesired output.
llvm.org/pr20545
llvm-svn: 214900
Currently, the test runner makes the assumption that it will run
commands through /bin/sh. This is obviously not true on Windows,
so this patch abstracts this logic out somewhat. Instead of
having the caller build the command string himself, the caller
will now pass in argument list of the form [[a, b], [c, d], ...]
which will get converted into a string of the form a b; c d or
a b && c d, depending on the platform.
Reviewed by: Todd Fiala
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4590
llvm-svn: 213669
Our build is still getting this test to fail with the presence of const in
'(Foo &const) y = 0x' and '(Foo &&const) z = 0x'. This change simply changes
the match substrings to ignore the portion after the final '&' and before the
closing ')'. This should cover the presence (or absence) of the const qualifier.
llvm-svn: 206762
The additional "const" breaks the FreeBSD buildbot, and does not appear
to be due to a LLVM or Clang change. Revert the change while
investigating further.
This reverts revision 206619.
llvm-svn: 206751
Enable data formatters to see-through pointers/references to typedefs
For instance, if Foo is a typedef to Bar, and there is a formatter for any/all of Bar*, Bar&, Bar&&, then Foo*, Foo&, and Foo&& should pick these up if Foo-specific formatters don't exist
llvm-svn: 205939
These changes were written by Greg Clayton, Jim Ingham, Jason Molenda.
It builds cleanly against TOT llvm with xcodebuild. I updated the
cmake files by visual inspection but did not try a build. I haven't
built these sources on any non-Mac platforms - I don't think this
patch adds any code that requires darwin, but please let me know if
I missed something.
In debugserver, MachProcess.cpp and MachTask.cpp were renamed to
MachProcess.mm and MachTask.mm as they picked up some new Objective-C
code needed to launch processes when running on iOS.
llvm-svn: 205113
Revert the spirit of r199857 - a convincing case can be made that overriding a summary's format markers behind its back is not the right thing to do
This commit reverts the behavior of the code to the previous model, and changes the test case to validate the opposite of what it was validating before
llvm-svn: 201455
ValueObjectPrinter could enter an infinite loop while trying to display an aptly formed ValueObject: a reference, with a child of some pointer type, such that the pointees chain ended up pointing back to some part of itself - a pointer to itself being the simplest such case
Fixed here by only setting a pointer depth when needed, and ensuring that we won't overflow and wrap the pointer depth when it's zero.
llvm-svn: 200247
The "type format add" command gets a new flag --type (-t). If you pass -t <sometype>, upon fetching the value for an object of your type,
LLDB will display it as-if it was of enumeration type <sometype>
This is useful in cases of non-contiguous enums where there are empty gaps of unspecified values, and as such one cannot type their variables as the enum type,
but users would still like to see them as-if they were of the enum type (e.g. DWARF field types with their user-reserved ranges)
The SB API has also been improved to handle both types of formats, and a test case is added
llvm-svn: 198105
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
This commit reimplements the TypeImpl class (the class that backs SBType) in terms of a static,dynamic type pair
This is useful for those cases when the dynamic type of an ObjC variable can only be obtained in terms of an "hollow" type with no ivars
In that case, we could either go with the static type (+iVar information) or with the dynamic type (+inheritance chain)
With the new TypeImpl implementation, we try to combine these two sources of information in order to extract as much information as possible
This should improve the functionality of tools that are using the SBType API to do extensive dynamic type inspection
llvm-svn: 193564
Extend DummySyntheticProvider to actually use debug-info vended children as the source of information
Make Python synthetic children either be valid, or fallback to the dummy, like their C++ counterparts
This allows LLDB to actually stop bailing out upon encountering an invalid synthetic children provider front-end, and still displaying the non synthetized ivar info
llvm-svn: 192741
This radar extends the notion of one-liner summaries to automagically apply in a few interesting cases
More specifically, this checkin changes the printout of ValueObjects to print on one-line (as if type summary add -c had been applied) iff:
this ValueObject does not have a summary
its children have no synthetic children
its children are not a non-empty base class without a summary
its children do not have a summary that asks for children to show up
the aggregate length of all the names of all the children is <= 50 characters
you did not ask to see the types during a printout
your pointer depth is 0
This is meant to simplify the way LLDB shows data on screen for small structs and similarly compact data types (e.g. std::pair<int,int> anyone?)
Feedback is especially welcome on how the feature feels and corner cases where we should apply this printout and don't (or viceversa, we are applying it when we shouldn't be)
llvm-svn: 191996
DumpValueObject() 2.0
This checkin restores pre-Xcode5 functionality to the "po" (expr -O) command:
- expr now has a new --description-verbosity (-v) argument, which takes either compact or full as a value (-v is the same as -vfull)
When the full mode is on, "po" will show the extended output with type name, persistent variable name and value, as in
(lldb) expr -O -v -- foo
(id) $0 = 0x000000010010baf0 {
1 = 2;
2 = 3;
}
When -v is omitted, or -vcompact is passed, the Xcode5-style output will be shown, as in
(lldb) expr -O -- foo
{
1 = 2;
2 = 3;
}
- for a non-ObjectiveC object, LLDB will still try to retrieve a summary and/or value to display
(lldb) po 5
5
-v also works in this mode
(lldb) expr -O -vfull -- 5
(int) $4 = 5
On top of that, this is a major refactoring of the ValueObject printing code. The functionality is now factored into a ValueObjectPrinter class for easier maintenance in the future
DumpValueObject() was turned into an instance method ValueObject::Dump() which simply calls through to the printer code, Dump_Impl has been removed
Test case to follow
llvm-svn: 191694
I now see no unexpected failures on FreeBSD on a local run of the test
suite.
llvm.org/pr17214
llvm.org/pr17225
llvm.org/pr17231
llvm.org/pr17232
llvm.org/pr17233
llvm-svn: 190709
