Researching in prep of doing the implementation for lowering, I found
that the source of the valid identifiers list from flang is in the
frontend. This patch adds the same list to the frontend, but does it as
a sema diagnostic, so we still parse it as an identifier/identifier-like
thing, but then diagnose it as invalid later.
OpenACC 3.3-NEXT has changed the way tags for copy, copyin, copyout, and
create clauses are specified, and end up adding a few extras, and
permits them as a list. This patch encodes these as bitmask enum so
they can be stored succinctly, but still diagnose reasonably.
OpenACC Github PR#499 defines the pqr-list as having at least 1 item. We
already handle that for all but 'wait', so this patch just does the work
to add it for 'wait', plus adds tests.
'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses:
1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when combined with
reduction. These two aren't able to be combined on any other of the
compute constructs however.
2- The vars all must be 'numerical data types' types of some sort, or a
'composite of numerical data types'. A list of types is given in the
standard as a minimum, so we choose 'isScalar', which covers all of
these types and keeps types that are actually numeric. Other compilers
don't seem to implement the 'composite of numerical data types', though
we do.
3- Because of the above restrictions, member-of-composite is not
allowed, so any access via a memberexpr is disallowed. Array-element and
sub-arrays (aka array sections) are both permitted, so long as they meet
the requirements of #2.
This patch implements all of these for compute constructs.
When writing the test for this I seemingly forgot to put 'CHECK' on the
lines, so I didn't notice that I was printing the identifiers as
pointers rather than their names. This patch corrects the tests and the
print behavior.
device_type, also spelled as dtype, specifies the applicability of the
clauses following it, and takes a series of identifiers representing the
architectures it applies to. As we don't have a source for the valid
architectures yet, this patch just accepts all.
Semantically, this also limits the list of clauses that can be applied
after the device_type, so this implements that as well.
This reverts commit 06f04b2e27f2586d3db2204ed4e54f8b78fea74e.
This reapplies commit c4a9a374749deb5f2a932a7d4ef9321be1b2ae5d.
The build failures were caused by the patch depending on the order of
evaluation of arguments to a function. This reapplication separates out
the capture of one of the values.
This reverts commit c4a9a374749deb5f2a932a7d4ef9321be1b2ae5d.
This and the followup patch keep hitting an assert I wrote on the build
bots in a way that isn't clear. Reverting so I can fix it without a
rush.
device_type, also spelled as dtype, specifies the applicability of the
clauses following it, and takes a series of identifiers representing the
architectures it applies to. As we don't have a source for the valid
architectures yet, this patch just accepts all.
Semantically, this also limits the list of clauses that can be applied
after the device_type, so this implements that as well.
'wait' takes a few int-exprs (well, a series of async-arguments, but
those are effectively just an int-expr), plus a pair of tags. This
patch adds the support for this to the AST, and does the appropriate
semantic analysis for them.
This is a pretty simple clause, it takes an 'async-argument', which
effectively needs to be just parsed as an 'int' argument, since it can
be an arbitrarly integer at runtime (and negative values are legal for
implementation defined values).
This patch also cleans up the async-argument parsing, so 'wait' got some
minor quality-of-life improvements for parsing (both clause and
construct).
These two are very similar to the other 'var-list' variants, except they
require that the type of the variable be a pointer. This patch
implements that restriction.
Like 'copy', these also have alternate names, so this implements that as
well. Additionally, these have an optional tag of either 'readonly' or
'zero' depending on the clause.
Otherwise, this is a pretty rote implementation of the clause, as there
aren't any special rules for it.
The private clause is the first that takes a 'var-list', thus this has a
lot of additional work to enable the var-list type. A 'var' is a
traditional variable reference, subscript, member-expression, or
array-section, so checking of these is pretty minor.
Note: This ran into some issues with array-sections (aka sub-arrays)
that will be fixed in a follow-up patch.
