The "Dim" prefix is a legacy left-over that no longer makes sense, since
we have a very strict "Dimension" vs. "Level" definition for sparse
tensor types and their storage.
The "dimension" before "level" does not really make sense Note that
renaming the actual type DimLevelType to LevelType is still TBD, since
this is an externally visible change (e.g. visible to Python API).
This avoids seeing non-perm on the convert from COO to non-COO for
higher dimensional new operators (viz. reading in BSR).
This is step 1 out of 3 to make sparse_tensor.new work for BSR
When the Powers That Be decided that the name "sparse compiler" should
be changed to "sparsifier", we negected to change some of the comments
in the code; this pull request completes the name change.
This is a first revision in a small series of changes that removes
duplications between direct encoding methods and sparse tensor type
wrapper methods (in favor of the latter abstraction, since it provides
more safety). The goal is to simply end up with "just" SparseTensorType
This is a minor step towards deprecating bufferization.alloc_tensor().
It replaces the examples with tensor.empty() and adjusts the underlying
rewriting logic to prepare for this upcoming change.
This commit removes the deallocation capabilities of
one-shot-bufferization. One-shot-bufferization should never deallocate
any memrefs as this should be entirely handled by the
ownership-based-buffer-deallocation pass going forward. This means the
`allow-return-allocs` pass option will default to true now,
`create-deallocs` defaults to false and they, as well as the escape
attribute indicating whether a memref escapes the current region, will
be removed. A new `allow-return-allocs-from-loops` option is added as a
temporary workaround for some bufferization limitations.
This reverts commit 6a91dfedeb956dfa092a6a3f411e8b02f0d5d289.
This caused problems in downstream projects. We are reverting to give
them more time for integration.
This is the first commit in a series with the goal to rework the
BufferDeallocation pass. Currently, this pass heavily relies on copies
to perform correct deallocations, which leads to very slow code and
potentially high memory usage. Additionally, there are unsupported cases
such as returning memrefs which this series of commits aims to add
support for as well.
This first commit removes the deallocation capabilities of
one-shot-bufferization.One-shot-bufferization should never deallocate any
memrefs as this should be entirely handled by the buffer-deallocation pass
going forward. This means the allow-return-allocs pass option will
default to true now, create-deallocs defaults to false and they, as well
as the escape attribute indicating whether a memref escapes the current region,
will be removed.
The documentation should w.r.t. these pass option changes should also be
updated in this commit.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156662
This patch is part of a larger initiative aimed at fixing floating-point `max` and `min` operations in MLIR: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fix-floating-point-max-and-min-operations-in-mlir/72671.
This commit addresses Task 1.2 of the mentioned RFC. By renaming these operations, we align their names with LLVM intrinsics that have corresponding semantics.
The tensor levels are now explicitly categorized into different `LoopCondKind` to instruct LoopEmitter generate different code for different kinds of condition (e.g., `SparseCond`, `SparseSliceCond`, `SparseAffineIdxCond`, etc)
The process of generating a while loop is now dissembled into three steps and they are dispatched to different LoopCondKind handler.
1. Generate LoopCondition (e.g., `pos <= posHi` for `SparseCond`, `slice.isNonEmpty` for `SparseAffineIdxCond`)
2. Generate LoopBody (e.g., compute the coordinates)
3. Generate ExtraChecks (e.g., `if (onSlice(crd))` for `SparseSliceCond`)
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152464
We recently fixed a bug in "sparsifying" such reductions, since
it incorrectly changed this into reductions over stored elements
only , which only works for add/sub/or/xor. However, we still want
to be able to "sparsify" the reductions even in the general case,
and this is a first step by rewriting them into a custom reduction
that feeds in the implicit zeros. NOTE HOWEVER, that in the long run
we want to do this better and feed in any implicit zero only ONCE
for efficiency.
Reviewed By: Peiming
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152580
This is a major step along the way towards the new STEA design. While a great deal of this patch is simple renaming, there are several significant changes as well. I've done my best to ensure that this patch retains the previous behavior and error-conditions, even though those are at odds with the eventual intended semantics of the `dimToLvl` mapping. Since the majority of the compiler does not yet support non-permutations, I've also added explicit assertions in places that previously had implicitly assumed it was dealing with permutations.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151505
This commit is part of the migration of towards the new STEA syntax/design. In particular, this commit includes the following changes:
* Renaming compiler-internal functions/methods:
* `SparseTensorEncodingAttr::{getDimLevelType => getLvlTypes}`
* `Merger::{getDimLevelType => getLvlType}` (for consistency)
* `sparse_tensor::{getDimLevelType => buildLevelType}` (to help reduce confusion vs actual getter methods)
* Renaming external facets to match:
* the STEA parser and printer
* the C and Python bindings
* PyTACO
However, the actual renaming of the `DimLevelType` itself (along with all the "dlt" names) will be handled in a separate commit.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150330
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.
Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.
Caveats include:
- This clang-tidy script probably has more problems.
- This only touches C++ code, so nothing that is being generated.
Context:
- https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants
for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
- Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443
Implementation:
This first patch was created with the following steps. The intention is
to only do automated changes at first, so I waste less time if it's
reverted, and so the first mass change is more clear as an example to
other teams that will need to follow similar steps.
Steps are described per line, as comments are removed by git:
0. Retrieve the change from the following to build clang-tidy with an
additional check:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
1. Build clang-tidy
2. Run clang-tidy over your entire codebase while disabling all checks
and enabling the one relevant one. Run on all header files also.
3. Delete .inc files that were also modified, so the next build rebuilds
them to a pure state.
4. Some changes have been deleted for the following reasons:
- Some files had a variable also named cast
- Some files had not included a header file that defines the cast
functions
- Some files are definitions of the classes that have the casting
methods, so the code still refers to the method instead of the
function without adding a prefix or removing the method declaration
at the same time.
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy
run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
-header-filter=mlir/ mlir/* -fix
rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
git restore mlir/lib/IR mlir/lib/Dialect/DLTI/DLTI.cpp\
mlir/lib/Dialect/Complex/IR/ComplexDialect.cpp\
mlir/lib/**/IR/\
mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseVectorization.cpp\
mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/Transforms/LowerVectorMultiReduction.cpp\
mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Test/TestTypes.cpp\
mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Transform/TestTransformDialectExtension.cpp\
mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Test/TestAttributes.cpp\
mlir/unittests/TableGen/EnumsGenTest.cpp\
mlir/test/python/lib/PythonTestCAPI.cpp\
mlir/include/mlir/IR/
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150123
These functions don't need a`PatternRewriter`, they only need an `OpBuilder`. And, the builder should be the first argument, before the `Location`, to match the style used everywhere else in MLIR.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148059
This commit contains several code changes which are ultimately required for converting the varions `Merger` identifiers from typedefs to newtypes. The actual implementation of the newtypes themselves has been split off into separate commits, in hopes of simplifying the review process.
Depends On D146561
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146684
Replace references to enumerate results with either result_pairs
(reference wrapper type) or structured bindings. I did not use
structured bindings everywhere as it wasn't clear to me it would
improve readability.
This is in preparation to the switch to zip semantics which won't
support non-const lvalue reference to elements:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144503.
I chose to use values instead of const lvalue-refs because MLIR is
biased towards avoiding `const` local variables. This won't degrade
performance because currently `result_pair` is cheap to copy (size_t
+ iterator), and in the future, the enumerator iterator dereference
will return temporaries anyway.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146006
This change does a bunch of renaming to clear up confusions in these files. In particular, this change:
* Renames variables and methods to clarify the "dim"/"lvl" distinction, and changes them to use the `Dimension`/`Level` types as appropriate.
* Introduces new typedefs
* `ExprId`, `LatPointId`, `LatSetId`: to clarify the interning design of the Merger.
* `LoopId`, `LoopOrd`: to clarify the distinction between arbitrary names for loop-variables, vs numeric identifiers based on the actual order of loop generation.
* `TensorId`
* (Future CLs will change these from typedefs to structs/classes, so that the typechecker can help avoid mixups.)
* Updates documentation to match the new terminology
* Adds additional assertions
* Adds `const` to local variables along the way
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145756
The old "pointer/index" names often cause confusion since these names clash with names of unrelated things in MLIR; so this change rectifies this by changing everything to use "position/coordinate" terminology instead.
In addition to the basic terminology, there have also been various conventions for making certain distinctions like: (1) the overall storage for coordinates in the sparse-tensor, vs the particular collection of coordinates of a given element; and (2) particular coordinates given as a `Value` or `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, vs particular coordinates given as `ValueRange` or similar. I have striven to maintain these distinctions
as follows:
* "p/c" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when there is no risk of confusion. (Just like we use "d/l" to abbreviate "dim/lvl".)
* "pos/crd" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when a longer name is helpful to avoid ambiguity or to form compound names (e.g., "parentPos"). (Just like we use "dim/lvl" when we need a longer form of "d/l".)
I have also used these forms for a handful of compound names where the old name had been using a three-letter form previously, even though a longer form would be more appropriate. I've avoided renaming these to use a longer form purely for expediency sake, since changing them would require a cascade of other renamings. They should be updated to follow the new naming scheme, but that can be done in future patches.
* "coords" is used for the complete collection of crd values associated with a single element. In the runtime library this includes both `std::vector` and raw pointer representations. In the compiler, this is used specifically for buffer variables with C++ type `Value`, `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, etc.
The bare form "coords" is discouraged, since it fails to make the dim/lvl distinction; so the compound names "dimCoords/lvlCoords" should be used instead. (Though there may exist a rare few cases where is is appropriate to be intentionally ambiguous about what coordinate-space the coords live in; in which case the bare "coords" is appropriate.)
There is seldom the need for the pos variant of this notion. In most circumstances we use the term "cursor", since the same buffer is reused for a 'moving' pos-collection.
* "dcvs/lcvs" is used in the compiler as the `ValueRange` analogue of "dimCoords/lvlCoords". (The "vs" stands for "`Value`s".) I haven't found the need for it, but "pvs" would be the obvious name for a pos-`ValueRange`.
The old "ind"-vs-"ivs" naming scheme does not seem to have been sustained in more recent code, which instead prefers other mnemonics (e.g., adding "Buf" to the end of the names for `TypeValue<MemRefType>`). I have cleaned up a lot of these to follow the "coords"-vs-"cvs" naming scheme, though haven't done an exhaustive cleanup.
* "positions/coordinates" are used for larger collections of pos/crd values; in particular, these are used when referring to the complete sparse-tensor storage components.
I also prefer to use these unabbreviated names in the documentation, unless there is some specific reason why using the abbreviated forms helps resolve ambiguity.
In addition to making this terminology change, this change also does some cleanup along the way:
* correcting the dim/lvl terminology in certain places.
* adding `const` when it requires no other code changes.
* miscellaneous cleanup that was entailed in order to make the proper distinctions. Most of these are in CodegenUtils.{h,cpp}
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144773
